ᐅ House Photos Discussion Corner – Share Your Home Pictures!

Created on: 25 Nov 2015 10:27
K
Koempy
Hello,

It would be really great if everyone here could just post one or a few pictures showing the current state of their house.

I'll start right away.

For renovations, it’s best to provide a comparison of before and after the remodeling.

Before March 2014:



After May 2015:

Climbee18 Sep 2018 12:13
I wouldn’t agree to be a guinea pig either. But the geothermal concept has been working for several years now, and I believe we are the fifth wooden basement. After he built one for his own daughter as well, we decided to try it too.
A
Alex85
18 Sep 2018 12:52
This is really interesting. The information regarding surface collectors is very clear: under no circumstances should they be built over, as precipitation significantly contributes to their efficiency.
How much does the collector cost?
L
Lumpi_LE
18 Sep 2018 13:16
Well, I wouldn’t have done that... Where is the heat supposed to come from? The basement unheated? And then the costs to push the heat back in during summer?
An air-to-water heat pump is definitely much more efficient and cheaper in this case.
B
Bookstar
18 Sep 2018 13:27
Yes, technically it is hard to understand since neither sunlight nor precipitation reach there. Where does the regeneration come from?

A wooden cellar is also interesting, because if there is ever water intrusion, how can it be repaired? Is it watertight in the long term, over 20 years? And so on.

But I don’t want to unsettle you with this; experience shows that it apparently works.
Climbee18 Sep 2018 13:52
The manufacturer of the membranes offers a 50-year warranty (which is more than enough for me at 51 years old; after me, the flood), but only because legally that is the maximum allowed. In reality, they probably last much longer.
Experience with these membranes goes back 35 years now, but only above ground. If they are underground without exposure to light or other weather conditions, their durability should be even better (judging by the plastic sheet we dug up that probably has been buried since my parents’ house was built, I have no concerns at all; it looks like new).

The pipes lie in sand, which seems to be crucial. I don’t know the technical details; I simply trusted the practical experience.
In summer, the excess heat from the solar system is carried through these pipes, warming the surrounding soil (at the mentioned daughter’s place, the ground is now around 24°C (75°F)).
I can ask again for more detailed information at the next meeting. As a layperson, it all made sense to me, although I must admit I had never heard the idea that it “needs sun and rainfall” before.
C
chand1986
18 Sep 2018 14:07
Bookstar schrieb:
Where does the regeneration come from?

First of all, I would suggest that with soil that is not too fine-grained, capillary forces can draw water in from the sides. This would then be THE main mechanism to bring in solar energy from the sides (stored as heat in the water).
Differences in temperature compared to the case without a building permit / planning permission (BP) on top could be compensated by a larger collector area.
This is roughly my theory. Otherwise, I don’t see how it works.

The fact that it is installed in sand, in my opinion, supports this.