blaupuma schrieb:
Is it just me, or does the cladding appear more yellow in the last pictures compared to the first ones?In the photos, it really is like that – gray/white shades in yellow sunlight with changing brightness due to shifting viewing angles: the key point is white balance, which you can't really adjust much with a smartphone. As long as the real material is all the same stone, it’s not much of an issue.
I quite like the brick, even though I prefer “more natural” tones. What I don’t find so appealing is the missing soldier course or an arch over the lintels. Lintels in patterned brickwork with what is presumably reinforcing steel are not permanently stable or might eventually sag, causing small cracks – unless reinforcing steel was also installed in the rows of bricks above.
Also, it looks a bit old-fashioned, but that’s a matter of personal taste.
PS: I have a white sand-lime brick facade myself and the same lintels. However, mine were secondhand, so switching isn’t that easy.
It is probably (hopefully!) due to the lighting/screen settings, etc...
The first picture looks like a light gray to me (nice!), the last ones appear beige-sand (well...)...
The first picture looks like a light gray to me (nice!), the last ones appear beige-sand (well...)...
P
pffreestyler8 Nov 2018 15:28Wow, things are moving very fast for you.
The variation in appearance is definitely due to the phone, lighting, or external conditions. We experienced the same several times while searching for a brick veneer.
Yesterday, the stretcher bond pattern was built.

On Saturday, I need to decide whether to include a triangular window under the gable. I find it visually very appealing but also more complex for the masons. We definitely have enough space in the gable— the attic has a height of 2.4 meters (7 ft 10 in).
The variation in appearance is definitely due to the phone, lighting, or external conditions. We experienced the same several times while searching for a brick veneer.
Yesterday, the stretcher bond pattern was built.
On Saturday, I need to decide whether to include a triangular window under the gable. I find it visually very appealing but also more complex for the masons. We definitely have enough space in the gable— the attic has a height of 2.4 meters (7 ft 10 in).
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 10
- 20
- 30
- 40
- 50
- 60
- 70
- 80
- 90
- 100
- 110
- 120
- 130
- 140
- 150
- 160
- 170
- 180
- 190
- 200
- 210
- 220
- 230
- 240
- 250
- 260
- 270
- 280
- 290
- 300
- 310
- 320
- 330
- 340
- 350
- 360
- 370
- 380
- 390
- 400
- 410
- 420
- 430
- 440
- 450
- 460
- 470
- 480
- 490
- 500
- 510
- 520
- 530
- 540
- 550
- 560
- 570
- 580
- 590
- 600
- 610
- 620
- 630
- 640
- 650
- 660
- 670
- 680
- 690
- 700
- 710
- 720
- 721
- 722
- 723
- 724
- 725
- 726
- 727
- 728
- 729
- 730
- 740
- 750
- 760
- 770
- 780
- 790
- 800
- 810
- 820
- 830
- 840
- 850
- 860
- 870
- 880
- 890
- 900
- 910
- 920
- 930
- 940
- 950
- 960
- 970
- 980
- 990
- 1000
- 1010
- 1020
- 1030
- 1040
- 1050
- 1060
- 1070
- 1080
- 1090
- 1100
- 1110
- 1120
- 1130
- 1140
- 1150
- 1160
- 1170
- 1180
- 1190
- 1200
- 1210
- 1220
- 1230
- 1240
- 1250
- 1260
- 1270
- 1280
- 1290
- 1300
- 1310
- 1320
- 1330
- 1340
- 1350
- 1360
- 1370
- 1380
- 1390
- 1400
- 1410
- 1420
- 1430
- 1440
- 1450
- 1460
- 1470
- 1480
- 1490
- 1500
- 1510
- 1520
- 1530
- 1540
- 1550
- 1560
- 1570
- 1580
- 1590
- 1600
- 1610
- 1620
- 1630
- 1640
- 1650
- 1660
- 1670
- 1680
- 1690
- 1700
- 1710
- 1720
- 1730
- 1740
- 1750
- 1760
- 1770
- 1780
- 1790
- 1800
- 1810
- 1820
- 1830
- 1840
- 1850
- 1860
- 1870
- 1880
- 1890
- 1900
- 1910
- 1920
- 1930
- 1940
- 1950
- 1960
- 1970
- 1980
- 1981
- 1982
- 1983
- Next
Similar topics