ᐅ Preliminary floor plan design for a 220 m² single-family house

Created on: 20 Jun 2017 22:41
R
R.Hotzenplotz
Hello!

We have already gone through several plans with our architect and I think we are almost there, about to start the detailed planning phase. Before that, I’m looking forward to getting feedback from other users.

Development plan/restrictions: §34 – two full stories

Plot size: 1,085m² (1,1679 yd²)

Basement, floors – 2 full stories plus partial basement

Number of people, ages – 3 people (37, 34, 1, second child planned)

Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor – the requirement was that bedrooms and the study should be about 17m² (183 ft²) each; the entire house should be approximately 220m² (2,368 ft²)

Office: family use

Guests per year: 1

Open or closed architecture: closed

Traditional or modern design: modern

Open kitchen, kitchen island – no open kitchen, but yes to a kitchen island

Number of dining seats – 6

Fireplace – yes

Music/stereo wall – TV wall

Balcony, roof terrace – balcony

Garage, carport – large garage

Additional wishes/special features/daily routines, preferably with reasons why certain things should or should not be included – everyone should be able to sleep as undisturbed as possible in their bedrooms, even if other family members are awake. The husband is sometimes up as early as 4 a.m. Otherwise, watching TV in the evening should be possible without disturbing those sleeping upstairs.

House design
Who created the design:
- Architect (freelancer for a general contractor)

What do you like most? Why?
The upper floor with well-sized rooms and the location of the rooms exactly where they should be (only the washroom area we would still like to move to the outer right corner so that you don’t have to pass it every time you use the toilet). On the ground floor, the access through an airlock, the kitchen, and the dining area with the study next to it are especially liked.
Also appreciated is that after adjustments, the study now faces the garden instead of the street.

What don’t you like? Why?
We originally wanted the distance from wall to wall where the sofa and TV stand is to be about 6.40m (21 ft) (large screen & surround system), but so far only 5.69m (19 ft) has been realized.

Laundry room as described.

Kitchen larger in square meters than needed; the approx. 3m² (32 ft²) could theoretically be used well in the living area.

Price estimate according to architect/planner:
720,000 euros (including construction incidentals)

Personal price limit for the house, including equipment:
800,000 euros

Preferred heating technology:
Gas

If you have to give up on something, which details/features can you do without?

- Can do without:
Technical systems like controlled residential ventilation

- Cannot do without:
Space (except for the kitchen)

Why is the design the way it is now? For example:
Is this a standard design from the planner?
The architect has largely implemented our wishes; the only issue is the living room situation.

What makes it particularly good or bad in your opinion?
Patient, quick to implement, has already gotten to know us well.
No negative points.

Do you notice any other points that might not fit or that we should consider, which we might have overlooked?

In the basement, the room currently labeled as home cinema might possibly be used as one medium- to long-term. For the foreseeable future, it will be a storage room.
11ant26 Aug 2017 20:33
winnetou78 schrieb:
Are we talking about panels that can be installed in a standard partition wall?

We’re talking about glass panels above doors (either still within the door frame, above the door leaf; or above the door frame).
winnetou78 schrieb:
Where can you get something like that?

Anywhere you want – but for fitting accuracy, it’s best to get them from the carpenter or door manufacturer who supplied the rest of the door.

They are basically “windows,” not lights or anything like that.

So, they let light through rather than producing it.

The latter is also conceivable: building a kind of “display case” attached above the “door frame,” where concealed lighting is installed – using daylight during the day and added electric light in the evening.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
W
winnetou78
26 Aug 2017 20:37
So, basically extended doors with glass panels at the top, meaning the lintel in the partition wall needs to be higher?
11ant26 Aug 2017 20:40
winnetou78 schrieb:
So, practically extended doors with glass at the top, right?

You could say that.
winnetou78 schrieb:
So, the lintel in the partition wall would be higher?

Or not at all, if the door is floor-to-ceiling.

In the “display case version” (flush with the wall/frame), it looks more elegant if the other doors don’t have that feature. Then the frames are all the same height, but in this case the lintel and the wall area above are missing here, though the overall appearance is “uniform.” The version with the frame is more elegant when the other doors are also this height. Then the only difference above the door leaf is glass versus wood surface.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
W
winnetou78
26 Aug 2017 20:46
Sounds like a good idea, but it will probably be costly.
R
R.Hotzenplotz
26 Aug 2017 20:58
11ant schrieb:

Secondly, this would mostly eliminate the need for supporting beams entirely, and firstly, you wouldn’t lose any floor space: what would be lost under the laundry drying balcony would be regained to the right through the outward shift of the exterior wall* under the upper floor’s area again. Overall, the total floor area would remain neutral. At least the corner window wouldn’t suffer any loss anymore due to the bay window projection being only half as wide, possibly sacrificing the entire bay, but you were already considering that.

I also thought about the saved effort regarding the supporting beams. That would solve a whole lot with one move.

However, I can’t quite understand how no floor space would be lost, with what’s lost under the laundry drying balcony coming back through the exterior wall shift on the right. I don’t understand that at all. Sorry.
11ant26 Aug 2017 21:35
R.Hotzenplotz schrieb:
However, I just can’t understand how you don’t lose any floor area that would be beneath the laundry drying balcony and then supposedly recovered on the right side by shifting the exterior wall. I don’t understand that at all.

Large floor plan of a house: kitchen, living area, office, hallway, cloakroom, and shower with furniture.


blue: line of the upper floor wall layout, laundry drying balcony
pink: floor area loss in the living room if the wall layout below and above is the same and the terrace is under the balcony
green: floor area gain from the same adjustment

Result: roughly neutral overall.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/