ᐅ What is the minimum required distance between a fireplace and a television?
Created on: 8 Dec 2017 15:11
C
chrisw81Hello, I am currently trying to incorporate the fireplace into my floor plan. It should be placed against a wall opposite the sofa, where the TV is also located. Since both should be clearly visible, the fireplace shouldn’t be too far from the TV. I am considering a single-sided fireplace, meaning it would be built-in with heat radiating only through the front glass. Now the question is, how much space do I need to leave next to the fireplace wall to prevent the TV from overheating?
Seriously: I recommend a fireplace-to-TV distance of zero, meaning the fireplace is fully displayed on the TV.
Sounds crazy, oh God, of course 11ant is smoking the wrong stuff *hands over head*
But: on one hand, people tend to underestimate the impact that modern insulation standards and heating systems have on how rarely you actually want to use a fireplace for heating, and how much of an overkill it already is. In that sense, expect the worst case: lighting it only five times a year for heating purposes. When used so rarely, it’s an extremely expensive luxury.
On the other hand, the cozy atmosphere of a fireplace is usually the real reason people want one. Our senses can be easily fooled, and that’s where modern technology comes into play: accompanied by the Dolby surround crackle of burning wood, a modern gigapixel TV can simulate a fireplace more realistically than reality itself—without the need for a chimney or ventilation.
I know, coming from a self-confessed analog fan, this might sound like I’ve been sitting too close to the fireplace myself. But I’m a businessman, too.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Sounds crazy, oh God, of course 11ant is smoking the wrong stuff *hands over head*
But: on one hand, people tend to underestimate the impact that modern insulation standards and heating systems have on how rarely you actually want to use a fireplace for heating, and how much of an overkill it already is. In that sense, expect the worst case: lighting it only five times a year for heating purposes. When used so rarely, it’s an extremely expensive luxury.
On the other hand, the cozy atmosphere of a fireplace is usually the real reason people want one. Our senses can be easily fooled, and that’s where modern technology comes into play: accompanied by the Dolby surround crackle of burning wood, a modern gigapixel TV can simulate a fireplace more realistically than reality itself—without the need for a chimney or ventilation.
I know, coming from a self-confessed analog fan, this might sound like I’ve been sitting too close to the fireplace myself. But I’m a businessman, too.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
I assume you don’t have, or have never had, a fireplace, right? [emoji6]
To the original poster, it’s simple: ask your fireplace installer. Without detailed knowledge of the fireplace system, no one can give a reliable opinion (and neither can I, based on what I know). Therefore, my recommendation is to find a skilled fireplace professional who can design a SUITABLE system for you. Then it will be used more than just 2 to 4 times a year, and you won’t end up with what 11ant described. A fireplace is generally more of a luxury feature, primarily for ambiance and atmosphere rather than heating, although there are exceptions. My impression is that using a fireplace for heating is only about a 5% use case.
If the heating output is too high and/or you can’t get rid of the heat (sitting sweaty on the couch like a sauna), you won’t enjoy it, and it will just remain an expensive, unused design element. Or you throttle it down as much as possible and end up with blackened glass, which leads to the same result: it’s not used.
And yes, it can also be an option to get the fireplace Blu-ray. For me, however, it’s not the same because I’ve experienced both and notice huge differences, which might not be the case for everyone.
Physically speaking, the difference is clear: you definitely cannot replicate the full range of what a real fireplace offers with even the best television. Maybe the picture, maybe the sound, but that’s it. If that’s enough for someone, fine, but not for me. I’d rather be standing on Table Mountain, at the edge of the Grand Canyon, or on the Wadden Sea coast than watching a DVD of “views,” but people are different...
To the original poster, it’s simple: ask your fireplace installer. Without detailed knowledge of the fireplace system, no one can give a reliable opinion (and neither can I, based on what I know). Therefore, my recommendation is to find a skilled fireplace professional who can design a SUITABLE system for you. Then it will be used more than just 2 to 4 times a year, and you won’t end up with what 11ant described. A fireplace is generally more of a luxury feature, primarily for ambiance and atmosphere rather than heating, although there are exceptions. My impression is that using a fireplace for heating is only about a 5% use case.
If the heating output is too high and/or you can’t get rid of the heat (sitting sweaty on the couch like a sauna), you won’t enjoy it, and it will just remain an expensive, unused design element. Or you throttle it down as much as possible and end up with blackened glass, which leads to the same result: it’s not used.
And yes, it can also be an option to get the fireplace Blu-ray. For me, however, it’s not the same because I’ve experienced both and notice huge differences, which might not be the case for everyone.
Physically speaking, the difference is clear: you definitely cannot replicate the full range of what a real fireplace offers with even the best television. Maybe the picture, maybe the sound, but that’s it. If that’s enough for someone, fine, but not for me. I’d rather be standing on Table Mountain, at the edge of the Grand Canyon, or on the Wadden Sea coast than watching a DVD of “views,” but people are different...
ruppsn schrieb:
A fireplace is definitely more of a luxury feature and primarily adds atmosphere and a feeling of comfort, rather than serving as a main heat source—although there are exceptions. My impression is that using a fireplace for heating represents only about a 5% use case... I get the impression that a fireplace is increasingly becoming a room divider from a home planner software’s furniture catalogue. Implementing something like that is easy to click through, but expensive and not very economical. I agree with the description "luxury" at least to the extent that I would find an open fireplace oversized for homes smaller than 160 to 180 sqm (1700 to 1900 sq ft). ruppsn schrieb:
For me, it’s not appealing because I have the comparison and perceive huge differences, which certainly isn’t the case for everyone. Physically, the difference is clear anyway: you definitely cannot replicate the full range of what a fireplace offers with even the best television. Exactly. However, in my experience, the majority of people are those whose senses are not easily fooled by optical illusions, and for whom a virtual fireplace cannot psychologically replace a real one. Therefore, I think it makes sense to consider whether you might belong to this group and could save a lot by choosing the economy option.https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
One meter to 1.20 meters (3.3 to 3.9 feet) is enough when considering heat.
However, I believe the TV stand visually outshines the fireplace. In other words, each unit should have its own well-thought-out place.
Think about whether, when socializing or reading a book, you want to watch the TV while the fireplace is on.
As a result, I would suggest allocating different walls or areas in the house for these two elements, for example, the next wall, as a room divider, or a large space between them.
So, I wouldn’t generally say that 1 to 1.20 meters (3.3 to 3.9 feet) is sufficient. Show us the room layout.
However, I believe the TV stand visually outshines the fireplace. In other words, each unit should have its own well-thought-out place.
Think about whether, when socializing or reading a book, you want to watch the TV while the fireplace is on.
As a result, I would suggest allocating different walls or areas in the house for these two elements, for example, the next wall, as a room divider, or a large space between them.
So, I wouldn’t generally say that 1 to 1.20 meters (3.3 to 3.9 feet) is sufficient. Show us the room layout.
Similar topics