Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 327 m² (3,526 ft²)
Slope: no
Site coverage ratio: 0.2
Floor area ratio: 0.3
Building window, building line, and building boundary
§34 - 3 m (10 feet) setback, etc.
Edge development: Not relevant to the question
Number of parking spaces: 1
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: Gable
Architectural style: Modern
Orientation
Maximum heights/limits
Other requirements
The house itself is determined by the developer and therefore cannot be influenced in terms of dimensions, shape, and orientation (see floor plans). The focus is solely on the internal floor plans, layout, and optimal use of space.
Homeowners’ Requirements
Style, roof type, building type: Set by developer, as above
Basement, floors
No basement, 2 floors with converted attic
Number of occupants, age
Current: 2 adults, one child (8 years), two more children planned
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor
Square meters predetermined by the building (52.44 m² (565 ft²) gross internal floor area)
Office: Home office?
Overnight guests per year: 8
Open or closed architecture: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen: Yes, island only if not too cramped
Number of dining places: 6
Fireplace: no
Music/stereo wall: home cinema
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: no
Utility garden, greenhouse: later, not part of the question
Additional wishes / special features / daily routine:
We still need some storage space somewhere, as there is no basement.
Extra shower bathroom, because with 5 people in the morning it would otherwise get too congested, and also for guests.
Partner dislikes “slanted” room doors, so rooms should always be accessible at right angles (entry to kitchen/living room is an exception (but no door installed there either)).
House Design
Planner:
- Do-it-yourself based on a plan from the builder
What do you particularly like? Why?
6 rooms included, extra shower bathroom included, managed to get some storage space.
What do you dislike? Why?
Narrow bedroom, very small utility room (must be at least 5 m² (54 ft²) according to the builder), one room with many corners in the attic.
Price estimate according to architect/planner:
300,000
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings:
330,000 (all in, excluding exterior works and additional costs)
Preferred heating technology:
Air source heat pump
If you had to give up, on which details/extensions
- could you give up:
Storage room (then maybe as a shed?)
- cannot give up:
Second shower bathroom, separate office
Why is the design the way it is? For example
Standard design by planner?
Which wishes were implemented by the architect?
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your opinion?
Self-modified design proposal from the builder. Originally had only 4 rooms.
What is the most important/basic question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
Is this floor plan even possible?
Have we forgotten something? Can it be made nicer somehow? According to the builder, the staircase can be smaller, but the space must probably be allocated to the utility room (which the builder says is too small).
We are particularly concerned about the lack of storage space (no basement, no attic).
Where do you store your stuff then (not bulky waste, but items you do not need all year round: inflatable boat and air mattress, Christmas tree, winter jackets, etc.)?
Location plan will follow.
Thanks and regards
Tolentino


Plot size: 327 m² (3,526 ft²)
Slope: no
Site coverage ratio: 0.2
Floor area ratio: 0.3
Building window, building line, and building boundary
§34 - 3 m (10 feet) setback, etc.
Edge development: Not relevant to the question
Number of parking spaces: 1
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: Gable
Architectural style: Modern
Orientation
Maximum heights/limits
Other requirements
The house itself is determined by the developer and therefore cannot be influenced in terms of dimensions, shape, and orientation (see floor plans). The focus is solely on the internal floor plans, layout, and optimal use of space.
Homeowners’ Requirements
Style, roof type, building type: Set by developer, as above
Basement, floors
No basement, 2 floors with converted attic
Number of occupants, age
Current: 2 adults, one child (8 years), two more children planned
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor
Square meters predetermined by the building (52.44 m² (565 ft²) gross internal floor area)
Office: Home office?
Overnight guests per year: 8
Open or closed architecture: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen: Yes, island only if not too cramped
Number of dining places: 6
Fireplace: no
Music/stereo wall: home cinema
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: no
Utility garden, greenhouse: later, not part of the question
Additional wishes / special features / daily routine:
We still need some storage space somewhere, as there is no basement.
Extra shower bathroom, because with 5 people in the morning it would otherwise get too congested, and also for guests.
Partner dislikes “slanted” room doors, so rooms should always be accessible at right angles (entry to kitchen/living room is an exception (but no door installed there either)).
House Design
Planner:
- Do-it-yourself based on a plan from the builder
What do you particularly like? Why?
6 rooms included, extra shower bathroom included, managed to get some storage space.
What do you dislike? Why?
Narrow bedroom, very small utility room (must be at least 5 m² (54 ft²) according to the builder), one room with many corners in the attic.
Price estimate according to architect/planner:
300,000
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings:
330,000 (all in, excluding exterior works and additional costs)
Preferred heating technology:
Air source heat pump
If you had to give up, on which details/extensions
- could you give up:
Storage room (then maybe as a shed?)
- cannot give up:
Second shower bathroom, separate office
Why is the design the way it is? For example
Standard design by planner?
Which wishes were implemented by the architect?
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes it particularly good or bad in your opinion?
Self-modified design proposal from the builder. Originally had only 4 rooms.
What is the most important/basic question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
Is this floor plan even possible?
Have we forgotten something? Can it be made nicer somehow? According to the builder, the staircase can be smaller, but the space must probably be allocated to the utility room (which the builder says is too small).
We are particularly concerned about the lack of storage space (no basement, no attic).
Where do you store your stuff then (not bulky waste, but items you do not need all year round: inflatable boat and air mattress, Christmas tree, winter jackets, etc.)?
Location plan will follow.
Thanks and regards
Tolentino
Tolentino schrieb:
What do you lose with plaster? Living area.
Tolentino schrieb:
Sorry, but that’s not how I measure something you can’t physically handle. It’s my profession. And if you were a gardener, would you assign everyone a garden shed and a shovel for the big tasks? That’s not how it works.
Living space is definitely something best experienced in the room itself. In my opinion, you can't simply add up utility rooms by area without considering their function.
kaho674 schrieb:
We had a gas boiler combined with an instantaneous water heater in our old terraced house. I don’t think there’s a more space-saving option. If every centimeter counts, this isn’t a bad solution. It would even fit now in the sloped roof storage area I planned for you as an alternative. And how does that work with the energy saving regulations? If you have to install solar panels, then you also need storage. Our unit is about 80cm (31 inches) deep and 2 meters (6.6 feet) high… it also can’t be right up against the wall. There needs to be room for tools and a craftsman’s arm in between!
The wall thicknesses on the V
Is the gas heating system no longer compliant with the energy saving regulations? I thought that only applied to oil heating. Sorry, I guess I promised too much there. Our old terraced house, of course, had nothing to do with the current energy saving regulations.
But the heating system was really small. Maybe 40cm (16 inches) deep, 60cm (24 inches) high – but with all the pipes underneath as well. However, it was installed in an exactly similar storage space as the one the original poster would have.
ypg schrieb:
And what about the energy saving regulations?
Is the gas heating system no longer compliant with the energy saving regulations? I thought that only applied to oil heating. Sorry, I guess I promised too much there. Our old terraced house, of course, had nothing to do with the current energy saving regulations.
But the heating system was really small. Maybe 40cm (16 inches) deep, 60cm (24 inches) high – but with all the pipes underneath as well. However, it was installed in an exactly similar storage space as the one the original poster would have.
I had also thought about the Goalkeeper design and I am sharing my earlier draft again here.
I see you mention an internal dimension of 570 cm (225 inches) — couldn’t that be wider? I am thinking 590-600 cm (232-236 inches).
My Goalkeeper layout is based on an internal dimension of 640 cm (252 inches) with a side entrance.
I placed the technical room in the roof space, as well as the study, plus a guest/children’s/playroom that could later be used for a third child. The missing centimeters in width are quite frustrating.
A second full bathroom might be desirable, but I didn’t consider it because I prioritized ample hallway storage, including space for a stroller.
You can take a look for ideas.
Also, the question remains: how high can the knee wall be in the attic?

I see you mention an internal dimension of 570 cm (225 inches) — couldn’t that be wider? I am thinking 590-600 cm (232-236 inches).
My Goalkeeper layout is based on an internal dimension of 640 cm (252 inches) with a side entrance.
I placed the technical room in the roof space, as well as the study, plus a guest/children’s/playroom that could later be used for a third child. The missing centimeters in width are quite frustrating.
A second full bathroom might be desirable, but I didn’t consider it because I prioritized ample hallway storage, including space for a stroller.
You can take a look for ideas.
Also, the question remains: how high can the knee wall be in the attic?
ypg schrieb:
Living space.Haha
ypg schrieb:
And if you were a gardener, you would assign everyone a garden shed and a shovel for the big business? That’s not how it works.No, but then I would probably have spatial imagination.
ypg schrieb:
Living space is clearly what you experience best within the room. In my opinion, you can’t simply add utility rooms on top of that.Exactly, and that’s why I am bridging from what I know using numbers I’m familiar with.
It’s pointless to argue about it now. I know your opinion. For me, it’s not completely clear yet, and I want to make the best out of it.
Similar topics