ᐅ New construction of a semi-detached house approximately 8 by 11 meters, assessment of floor plan and windows
Created on: 18 May 2018 12:56
E
espressionistE
espressionist18 May 2018 12:56Hello everyone,
we are currently planning a semi-detached house measuring 8 x 11 m (26 x 36 ft) on a 289 sqm (3,110 sq ft) plot in a new development area (the neighboring house has not been built yet, as the area is still being developed).
We would appreciate your comments on the current floor plans and any tips regarding window planning!
Thank you very much!
Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 289 sqm (3,110 sq ft), approx. 10.3 x 29 m (34 x 95 ft), slightly angled in the southern section
Slope: no
Site coverage ratio: 0.35
Floor area ratio: 0.6
Building envelope, building line and boundaries: The building envelope starts 3 m (10 ft) south of the northern street and is 14 m (46 ft) long. There is an additional building easement (semi-detached house), and the building envelope ends 2.5 m (8 ft) before the eastern dead-end street.
Parking spaces: 2
Orientation: north-south
Other requirements: roof shape (gable roof), roof pitch (34 degrees), and eaves height (6 m / 20 ft) have already been agreed with the neighbors.
Client Requirements
Style, roof shape, building type: classic-modern, gable roof, semi-detached house
Basement, floors: basement, ground floor + upper floor as full stories
Number of occupants, ages: 4 (40, 40, 5, 1)
Ground floor room requirements: kitchen, dining area, living room, study (for occasional home office), WC + shower, cloakroom
Upper floor room requirements: bathroom, master bedroom, 2 children’s bedrooms (preferably similar size)
Office: home office
Guest stays per year: probably rare (2-3 times for 2-3 days)
Open or closed layout: open preferred on the ground floor (kitchen, dining, living areas), otherwise the rooms might feel too small
Open kitchen, kitchen island: open kitchen with a peninsula
Number of dining seats: regularly 6 with our current table (can be extended for up to 4 more seats)
Fireplace: no
Music/sound system wall: in the living room by the TV wall
Balcony, rooftop terrace: no
Garage, carport: carport (6.5 x 4 m / 21 x 13 ft) on the north side. Currently, a 2 x 2.5 m (7 x 8 ft) shed for bicycles, etc. is planned on the west side of the carport. The carport also serves as a covered entrance.
Vegetable garden, greenhouse: we would like to plant a little (e.g. raised bed), but it should not cause stress
Additional wishes / special features / daily routine, also reasons why certain things should or should not be included:
Our requirement for the upper floor was that the parents’ and children’s areas are at least somewhat separated (no shared wall).
This was achieved by the architect through a walk-in closet between the master bedroom and children’s room.
We can hardly do without a basement, as we cannot fit a garage on the plot (due to setback requirements in the development plan, this would force us to make the house narrower or give up too much garden space), and we also have limited space for storage or building services.
Because this results in a nicely sized hobby room in the basement, we decided not to finish the attic (so it will only be a roof space), as we believe we can fit everything else inside.
A finished attic would certainly be nice (guest room, media room, library, etc.) but with estimated additional costs of about 30,000, we prefer to forgo it.
House Design
Planning by: architect of our prefabricated house company
What do you like most? Why? Bedrooms and children’s rooms are adequately sized (previous plans had children’s rooms at 13 sqm / 140 sq ft), office on the ground floor (close to kitchen for coffee breaks), bright dining area
What do you dislike? Why? Windows—the architects’ design in the children’s rooms is okay, but in the master bedroom (window on the north side with the bed partially underneath), in the office (we would like a bookshelf on the north side and desk on the south side to avoid direct light on the monitor; parking space is planned on the east side, so a car would be parked right in front of the window), and bathroom / WC (parapet height too low?) are not completely convincing.
Price estimate from architect/planner: approximately 370,000 (turnkey, with floors already selected by us—we had a preliminary selection)
Personal budget limit for house, including finishing: about 400,000
Preferred heating system: air-to-water heat pump, underfloor heating
If you had to give up something, which details/finishes
- What you can give up: instead of a sliding door to the terrace, a regular door; instead of aluminum-plastic windows, only plastic windows (difference of 4,000); planned premium for a different staircase (7,000); partial wood facade omitted (planned cost 1,500)
- What you cannot give up: house size (should not be smaller)
Why is the design as it is now?
We initially spent several hours with a very friendly consultant from the company to develop a design based on our requirements (office on ground floor, slight separation of parent and children areas, shower on ground floor, basement, carport).
A friend who is an architect made some suggestions, and after an in-depth discussion with us, the company’s architect created the attached floor plan.
We like the floor plan quite well so far (we know that planning a semi-detached house comes with some limitations), but the window planning seems somewhat “old-fashioned” to us.
What is the most important / fundamental question about the floor plan, summarized in 130 characters?
Are there any major flaws in the floor plan that we have not noticed yet?
What would you possibly optimize?
What do you think about the window planning and our suggestions regarding it?
Thank you very much for your help and for the time you spend in this forum.
We appreciate any feedback!
we are currently planning a semi-detached house measuring 8 x 11 m (26 x 36 ft) on a 289 sqm (3,110 sq ft) plot in a new development area (the neighboring house has not been built yet, as the area is still being developed).
We would appreciate your comments on the current floor plans and any tips regarding window planning!
Thank you very much!
Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 289 sqm (3,110 sq ft), approx. 10.3 x 29 m (34 x 95 ft), slightly angled in the southern section
Slope: no
Site coverage ratio: 0.35
Floor area ratio: 0.6
Building envelope, building line and boundaries: The building envelope starts 3 m (10 ft) south of the northern street and is 14 m (46 ft) long. There is an additional building easement (semi-detached house), and the building envelope ends 2.5 m (8 ft) before the eastern dead-end street.
Parking spaces: 2
Orientation: north-south
Other requirements: roof shape (gable roof), roof pitch (34 degrees), and eaves height (6 m / 20 ft) have already been agreed with the neighbors.
Client Requirements
Style, roof shape, building type: classic-modern, gable roof, semi-detached house
Basement, floors: basement, ground floor + upper floor as full stories
Number of occupants, ages: 4 (40, 40, 5, 1)
Ground floor room requirements: kitchen, dining area, living room, study (for occasional home office), WC + shower, cloakroom
Upper floor room requirements: bathroom, master bedroom, 2 children’s bedrooms (preferably similar size)
Office: home office
Guest stays per year: probably rare (2-3 times for 2-3 days)
Open or closed layout: open preferred on the ground floor (kitchen, dining, living areas), otherwise the rooms might feel too small
Open kitchen, kitchen island: open kitchen with a peninsula
Number of dining seats: regularly 6 with our current table (can be extended for up to 4 more seats)
Fireplace: no
Music/sound system wall: in the living room by the TV wall
Balcony, rooftop terrace: no
Garage, carport: carport (6.5 x 4 m / 21 x 13 ft) on the north side. Currently, a 2 x 2.5 m (7 x 8 ft) shed for bicycles, etc. is planned on the west side of the carport. The carport also serves as a covered entrance.
Vegetable garden, greenhouse: we would like to plant a little (e.g. raised bed), but it should not cause stress
Additional wishes / special features / daily routine, also reasons why certain things should or should not be included:
Our requirement for the upper floor was that the parents’ and children’s areas are at least somewhat separated (no shared wall).
This was achieved by the architect through a walk-in closet between the master bedroom and children’s room.
We can hardly do without a basement, as we cannot fit a garage on the plot (due to setback requirements in the development plan, this would force us to make the house narrower or give up too much garden space), and we also have limited space for storage or building services.
Because this results in a nicely sized hobby room in the basement, we decided not to finish the attic (so it will only be a roof space), as we believe we can fit everything else inside.
A finished attic would certainly be nice (guest room, media room, library, etc.) but with estimated additional costs of about 30,000, we prefer to forgo it.
House Design
Planning by: architect of our prefabricated house company
What do you like most? Why? Bedrooms and children’s rooms are adequately sized (previous plans had children’s rooms at 13 sqm / 140 sq ft), office on the ground floor (close to kitchen for coffee breaks), bright dining area
What do you dislike? Why? Windows—the architects’ design in the children’s rooms is okay, but in the master bedroom (window on the north side with the bed partially underneath), in the office (we would like a bookshelf on the north side and desk on the south side to avoid direct light on the monitor; parking space is planned on the east side, so a car would be parked right in front of the window), and bathroom / WC (parapet height too low?) are not completely convincing.
Price estimate from architect/planner: approximately 370,000 (turnkey, with floors already selected by us—we had a preliminary selection)
Personal budget limit for house, including finishing: about 400,000
Preferred heating system: air-to-water heat pump, underfloor heating
If you had to give up something, which details/finishes
- What you can give up: instead of a sliding door to the terrace, a regular door; instead of aluminum-plastic windows, only plastic windows (difference of 4,000); planned premium for a different staircase (7,000); partial wood facade omitted (planned cost 1,500)
- What you cannot give up: house size (should not be smaller)
Why is the design as it is now?
We initially spent several hours with a very friendly consultant from the company to develop a design based on our requirements (office on ground floor, slight separation of parent and children areas, shower on ground floor, basement, carport).
A friend who is an architect made some suggestions, and after an in-depth discussion with us, the company’s architect created the attached floor plan.
We like the floor plan quite well so far (we know that planning a semi-detached house comes with some limitations), but the window planning seems somewhat “old-fashioned” to us.
What is the most important / fundamental question about the floor plan, summarized in 130 characters?
Are there any major flaws in the floor plan that we have not noticed yet?
What would you possibly optimize?
What do you think about the window planning and our suggestions regarding it?
Thank you very much for your help and for the time you spend in this forum.
We appreciate any feedback!
E
espressionist18 May 2018 14:13One more addition:
At the moment, we are considering adding a direct access (sliding door?) from the hallway to the kitchen, so you don’t have to go through the living room with groceries. Also, this would create a more direct route from the kitchen to the basement pantry.
While this would reduce some storage space in the kitchen on the hallway side, it might allow us to use the entire wall facing the office, eliminating the dead corner on the left side there.
What do you think?
At the moment, we are considering adding a direct access (sliding door?) from the hallway to the kitchen, so you don’t have to go through the living room with groceries. Also, this would create a more direct route from the kitchen to the basement pantry.
While this would reduce some storage space in the kitchen on the hallway side, it might allow us to use the entire wall facing the office, eliminating the dead corner on the left side there.
What do you think?
Hello expressionist,
thank you very much for the well-prepared thread, it really encourages responses and you will surely receive some feedback. I have just one question:
Is the other semi-detached house already built or planned? Perhaps there are still some design considerations to keep in mind for that side.
thank you very much for the well-prepared thread, it really encourages responses and you will surely receive some feedback. I have just one question:
Is the other semi-detached house already built or planned? Perhaps there are still some design considerations to keep in mind for that side.
E
espressionist18 May 2018 17:41Hello Jansens,
Thank you for your inquiry.
No, the other semi-detached house (to the west of us) has not been built yet. The plots are located in a new development area that is still being serviced (building permits/planning permission will be available from mid-June – but we are not in a big hurry).
We are in communication with our future neighbors and have already agreed on common values regarding eaves height and roof pitch (see above) – uniform roof pitch and eaves height are required by the development plan. However, ridge height and house length may vary. The houses may also be built staggered, which is currently planned:
Our neighbors are planning a 6.5 x 10.3 m (21 ft 4 in x 33 ft 9 in) house (with a basement and converted attic; their plot is narrower). Their house will start 4 m (13 ft 1 in) from the northern boundary. This results in a stagger of about 1.3 m (4 ft 3 in) to the south on our garden side (our half therefore extends slightly further south).
We would not want to shift our house further south, as this would mean losing some garden space and our neighbors would have an issue with this, as they would then be facing a rather large wall from their terrace.
Best regards
Thank you for your inquiry.
No, the other semi-detached house (to the west of us) has not been built yet. The plots are located in a new development area that is still being serviced (building permits/planning permission will be available from mid-June – but we are not in a big hurry).
We are in communication with our future neighbors and have already agreed on common values regarding eaves height and roof pitch (see above) – uniform roof pitch and eaves height are required by the development plan. However, ridge height and house length may vary. The houses may also be built staggered, which is currently planned:
Our neighbors are planning a 6.5 x 10.3 m (21 ft 4 in x 33 ft 9 in) house (with a basement and converted attic; their plot is narrower). Their house will start 4 m (13 ft 1 in) from the northern boundary. This results in a stagger of about 1.3 m (4 ft 3 in) to the south on our garden side (our half therefore extends slightly further south).
We would not want to shift our house further south, as this would mean losing some garden space and our neighbors would have an issue with this, as they would then be facing a rather large wall from their terrace.
Best regards
E
espressionist18 May 2018 18:22Pumbaa schrieb:
Floor area ratio 0.35 on 289 sqm (3112 sq ft) with a house size of 8x11 m (26x36 ft) – it will be tight with 2 parking spaces and a terrace…True, it is tight. But the architect said that as currently planned, it would fit (just barely).
Similar topics