ᐅ Floor plan of the penthouse level, approximately 155 sqm

Created on: 4 Mar 2017 12:53
B
bau.herr
bau.herr4 Mar 2017 12:53
Hello everyone,
I am sharing our floor plan here for discussion. I also have a second floor plan option for the upper floor with two children's rooms. Are there any suggestions for changes?
The entrance faces southeast.
If you need any additional information, please let me know.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
bau.herr

Development plan/restrictions
Plot size: 651sqm (7,006 sq ft)
No slope
Site coverage ratio: 0.3
Floor area ratio: n.a.
Building envelope, building line, and boundary: n.a.
Built-up edges: yes, with outbuildings
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 1
Roof type: pitched roof
Architectural style: n.a.
Orientation: n.a.
Maximum height/limits: 9.0m (29.5 ft)

Client requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type: hipped roof, urban villa
Basement, floors: no basement, 2 floors
Number of occupants, ages: 3, aged 33, 33, and 2
Room requirements on ground floor and upper floor
Office: no
Overnight guests per year: 6
Open or closed layout: open
Conservative or modern design: modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island: yes/yes
Number of dining seats: n.a.
Fireplace: no
Music/stereo wall: n.a.
Balcony, roof terrace: yes
Garage, carport: yes
Utility garden, greenhouse: no
Additional wishes/special features/daily routine, including reasons for preferences or exclusions: n.a.

House design
Planning by: architectural office
What do you like most? Why?
What do you not like? Why?
Cost estimate by architect/planner: n.a.
Personal budget for the house, including fittings: €320,000 (about $350,000)
Preferred heating system: gas heating
If you have to give up some details/upgrades:
- can give up: possibly the garage
- cannot give up:

Floor plan of an upper floor with balcony, master and children's rooms, bathroom and hallway
11ant4 Mar 2017 15:00
You’re making it a bit difficult for other participants by providing the ground floor (EG) and upper floor (OG) as PDFs and the alternative upper floor as an image, plus the site plan in an overwhelming size.

I find the alternative upper floor clearly better.
bau.herr schrieb:

House design
Who created the plans:
Planning office

Really, Planning office (???) – are they officially authorized to submit plans, or just ambitious amateurs who only know their way around a drawing program? – In the drawing (PDF), besides a lack of understanding of the system behind the construction dimensions, I also see a thermal design flaw in the shared garage wall. The identical alignment of the garage front and entrance bay window doesn’t look good either; I would move the garage back by half a meter (about 1.5 feet).

Regarding that question, all you’ll get from me is a relative “better than,” never an absolute “looks good as is,” since I could never accept the “Toscanian skirt” style. In my opinion, it’s the “Hawaiian toast” of architecture. Gelsenkirchen Baroque 2000.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
bau.herr4 Mar 2017 18:48
Hello

The floor plan (PDF) was created by a designer. I made the alternative floor plan for the upper floor myself, as well as the landscaping. So please forgive the mixed formats.

@11ant
What is the problem with the garage not having its own wall but being attached to the building?
Whether we need to move the garage, I will have to discuss with my wife. Thanks for the hint. Besides that, I like Toast Hawaii ;-)
11ant4 Mar 2017 19:24
bau.herr schrieb:

What is the issue with the garage not having its own wall and instead being built attached to the main building?

If the unheated structure is built onto the heated building without its own wall, it "facilitates" heat loss. A separation, starting from the foundation slab, is intended to improve this.
bau.herr schrieb:

I need to discuss with my wife whether we should move the garage.

She will understand this at first glance once she sees it in a perspective rendering. With the garage façade aligned with the entrance bay, the bay no longer projects forward; instead, the building in the area between appears recessed.

Architects who trained before CAD immediately notice details like this, meaning they simply avoid such designs.

You can crop images from PDF screenshots; this makes it easier to follow the discussion without switching back and forth between viewing programs.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
K
kbt09
4 Mar 2017 21:50
I can only recommend arranging the rooms as you plan to furnish them.

A kitchen with a room width of 308 cm (10 feet) and a cooking island, but then walls separating it from the dining area, simply won’t work.
Y
ypg
4 Mar 2017 22:19
The entrance faces southeast... this means the garage is located in the best part of the garden, and the utility room is on the prime side of the house. As a result, the house will be quite dark.

How many children are planned for the family? How many children’s bedrooms are planned in the layout?

Children’s bedrooms are less than 12sqm (130 sq ft), while bedrooms are over 12sqm (130 sq ft), each with a walk-in closet. Those are definitely trendy priorities. 😉

Otherwise, this house plan is likely quite common and already exists in many places as a standard design, although it has been somewhat enlarged here. The utility room is difficult to furnish; I would remove two doors!

Where will the coat storage be placed in the entrance hall? Under the stairs?

There will be no shower for guests, and a double bed does not fit in the bedroom...

Regards, Yvonne