ᐅ Floor Plan Design for a Single-Family House, Solid Wood Construction, 140 sqm in Lower Saxony

Created on: 2 Jan 2023 15:30
-
-LotteS-
Hello dear house building forum!

Here are some details—based on our best knowledge and judgment—about our house construction project...

Development Plan/Restrictions

Plot size 576 sqm (approx. 6195 sq ft) - parcel 17/28 (see cadastral map)
Slope no – the plot has only a few centimeters (inches) of elevation difference
Floor area ratio (FAR) 0.3 = 172.8 sqm (1861 sq ft)
Plot ratio not defined
Building envelope, building line and boundary 24x24 meter (79x79 feet) plot = N-E-S-W 16x18x16x18 meter (52x59x52x59 feet) building envelope
Edge development no, exceptions possibly according to Lower Saxony Building Regulations
Required number of parking spaces not specified
Number of floors single storey
Roof shape gable/hip/half-hip with 35-50 degree pitch
Architectural style classic detached house
Ridge direction specified = ridge line running west-east
Max height limits ridge height 4.0 m (13 ft), eaves height 8.5 m (28 ft)
Additional rules no oil heating, 50% of the south-facing roof must have solar panels, no building allowed between house and street (e.g., no parking or similar in front yard)

The plot has been purchased and the utility infrastructure in the new development area is already completed (our plot is even located on a pre-asphalted road).

Homeowner Requirements

Style, roof shape, building type solid wooden house made of massive log beams inside, blown insulation, and exterior cladding
Basement, floors no basement – only ground floor + upper floor
Number of occupants, ages three, aged 36, 29, and five and a half
Space requirements on ground and upper floors standard single-family home with 3 bedrooms plus bathroom upstairs, open-plan living area downstairs, guest WC, and large utility/housekeeping room
Office: family use or home office? One room currently usable as office/guest room (backup for future child needs), currently neither of us have jobs with home office option
Open or closed layout living/dining/kitchen preferably open
Conservative or modern construction style conservative
Open kitchen, kitchen island open kitchen yes, kitchen island currently not planned
Number of dining seats daily use for 3, but dining nook should be sufficient for more people
Fireplace planned is a masonry stove
Music/stereo wall no
Balcony, roof terrace no
Garage, carport carport with workshop
Utility garden, greenhouse no
Other wishes/special features/daily routine, including reasons why some things are included or excluded

House Design

Who designed the plan: plan based on our principles, then optimized with the manufacturer’s in-house architect
What do you particularly like? Why? We really like the extended dining nook with the surrounding bench; overall, our ideas about room sizes have been well implemented – whether everything will really work as we imagine, we would like to ask here.
What do you dislike? Why? The chimney’s position might be bothersome in the children's room? Or is that negligible in daily life? We are still not satisfied with the kitchen and bathroom upstairs and are currently looking for a good furnishing/decorating solution.
Price estimate according to architect/planner: Since we are not working with a general contractor but will handle contracts ourselves after the shell is built and do a lot of work ourselves, we don’t have all numbers yet. The following trades are currently being costed.
Personal price limit for the house including fittings: 400,000 up to move-in ready, excluding everything outside the building itself, plot is paid
Preferred heating technology: heat pump with underfloor heating plus photovoltaics with possible storage

If you have to give up something, which details/extensions

- can you do without: We have tried to adapt our demands to the budget as much as possible – does anyone see further savings potential?
- can you not do without: As an absolute last resort, we would remove the dining nook and redesign the ground floor – also, the masonry stove is fixed for us (we just love this cozy atmosphere).

Why is the design the way it is now?

Standard plan from planner? The manufacturer does not offer standard houses; everything is individually designed
Which of your wishes were implemented by the architect? The current plan reflects our wishes quite well. Now we just need fine-tuning, and we hope for your assessments, ideas, and experiences.
A mix of many examples from various magazines... Of course, our inspirations come from many different sources (good and bad…) 😀
What makes it particularly good or bad in your opinion? It feels good to us so far – all our furniture fits, and the things that bother us in our current rented house have been eliminated in the design.

What is the most important/basic question about the layout, summarized in 130 characters?

- Does the layout work as it is, or are there specific arrangements that don’t work?
- Is the position and number of windows sufficient?
- Do the children's rooms upstairs need two roof windows or is one enough each?
- Have we missed or overlooked anything important?
- Can a U-shaped kitchen be sensibly planned in the existing space, or do we need to adjust walls downstairs first?
- Are the door positions appropriate regarding width, wall distance, and opening direction?
- Is the utility room (unfurnished room behind the laundry on the north/east side of the ground floor) dimensionally adequate?
- What knee wall height is recommended upstairs? Currently at 40 cm (16 in), we plan to raise it because otherwise, especially the upstairs bathroom will be problematic (though we don’t want a large bathroom, just “as big as necessary” – we would probably place the bathtub in the northeast corner of the room – would that fit?
- We’d like to add a laundry chute from the upstairs bathroom to the utility room – does anyone have a good idea for the best location?


One final note on our general concept:
We intend to buy the house from the manufacturer including insulation, cladding, and roof structure. Assembly will follow the “master carpenter assembly” principle (the company provides two experienced workers, plus 4-5 helpers from us – full warranty and savings of around 15,000-20,000 euros, about three to four weeks of hard work). The manufacturer’s “basic package” also includes windows and the front door, as they must be specially installed due to the house settling.
We plan to contract the foundation slab, roofing, and plumbing work separately. Electrical work (in consultation with the local master electrician), interior finishing (room doors, screed, underfloor heating, floor covering), and small tasks can be done by my partner (trained electrician, highly interested in almost everything, skilled and experienced with wood). I work professionally in an office of a building materials supplier, so I have access to good conditions, storage capacity, and established contacts in the industry. We also have great friends and a large family who are all enthusiastic about our project and willing to support us. We know this will require a lot of work, strain our time, nerves, and budget—but we want to give it a try.

We are now looking forward to suggestions, critical comments, and anything that can help us avoid as many mistakes as possible during the process.

Thank you very much in advance!

Detailed site plan of a residential area with planned streets, plots, and green spaces.


Site plan with numbered plots; red circle marks parcel 17/28 at a street.


Floor plan of a residential house with living room, kitchen, dining, hallway, cloakroom, utility room, and carport annex


Floor plan of a residential level with flat-roof carport; bedroom, two children's rooms, hallway, bathroom, stairs.
11ant25 Jan 2023 16:13
-LotteS- schrieb:

If we calculated correctly, the roof structure is about 66cm (26 inches) thick. Since our preferred manufacturer (Nordic Haus) can only work with external roof insulation on the log walls and cannot insulate between the rafters, reducing the thickness is unfortunately not an option.

If a supplier can only work with their system by assuming the earth is flat, then the system is poorly designed, and I’d say “no further questions, Your Honor.” Other log house specialists are more capable, and this supplier would be out for me. Alternatively, I would have another carpentry company build the roof. Wood is wood, no matter whether Meier or Müller works with it. Some providers have their limitations, so you might have to combine solutions. Wait for the person addressed to respond (or ask yourself, for example, at Stommel). By the way, who did @Holzhäuschen build with?
-LotteS- schrieb:

Currently, we don’t have dormers in the plan because we are still unsure how...

Overall, I get the impression that you are not willing to do a proper relaunch. But you have to accept that starting material sometimes can’t be fixed adequately by patching. I’m not sure how much of this inflexibility is on your side versus the supplier and their system. Many log home builders struggle to upgrade from a hunting cabin standard to current energy efficiency building standards; in this regard, solid timber home builders who are willing to forego the charm of board saunas are generally much further ahead.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
W
WilderSueden
25 Jan 2023 16:14
-LotteS- schrieb:

I’m trying to imagine this... So the staircase would be located at the corner of the wall where the utility room door begins, keeping the stair shape and position but reversing the direction of ascent? Did I understand you correctly?

Yes, exactly. Instead of clockwise, counterclockwise. Because of a one-meter difference in the other rooms, I probably wouldn’t add a large dormer. But maybe one of the floor plan experts here will find a different staircase solution that actually provides a significantly usable space with a 50% dormer. My main point here was to encourage not just local optimization (a dormer for the bathroom, a dormer for the bedroom) but also to reconsider the entire house from time to time to see if new possibilities arise.
-LotteS-25 Jan 2023 16:24
11ant schrieb:

If a supplier’s system only works on the assumption that the ground is flat as a board, then the system is poorly designed, and I have "no further questions, Your Honor."

The supplier can also offer a completely different wall construction – but then it’s no longer related to a log house...
11ant schrieb:

Many log house enthusiasts struggle to successfully transition from a hunting lodge style to current energy-efficient building standards.

We could achieve KfW 40 with those, one of the big advantages 🙂
11ant schrieb:

I’m uncertain, however, how much of this lack of flexibility is due to you, or the supplier and their system.

That’s a good question... We are basically on our final attempt to find common ground. The sticking point is more the local development plan or the eave height. In the end, probably both. Or all three. That’s why I was hoping here again for someone to have an idea that is ultimately practical and achievable by the manufacturer. Going in circles for another month would neither be in our interest nor in the supplier’s.

There are several good manufacturers who could build what we imagine – however, we don’t have 500,000 just for the house in our budget. So, some options are unfortunately already off the table. I have a catalog from Stommel here as well, but they were on the “too expensive” list. Am I mistaken there?
-LotteS-25 Jan 2023 16:29
WilderSueden schrieb:

I mainly wanted to point out that it’s important not to only optimize locally (a dormer for the bathroom, a dormer for the bedroom), but also to occasionally reconsider the entire house to see if new possibilities arise.

Completely redesigning the stairwell by placing the staircase within a dormer is definitely a great approach, which we hadn’t considered yet. Thank you very much for your suggestion! 🙂
-LotteS-25 Jan 2023 16:47
11ant schrieb:

Or I would have another carpentry company build the roof. Wood is wood, whether Meier or Müller works with it. Some providers have weaknesses, so you might have to combine services.

I looked up the roof structure so you can visualize it. They use continuous cellulose insulation, which helps achieve good performance values...

Cross-section of a house with roof tiles, insulation, vapor retarder, timber frame wall, and window frame.
W
WilderSueden
25 Jan 2023 16:51
-LotteS- schrieb:

We could go with KfW 40 with them, one of the major "pros" 🙂

The question is whether that should really be the priority. The subsidies have been significantly reduced by now, making it much less attractive. In any case, the energy efficiency standard should clearly come after the living comfort. And due to the eave height, you simply don’t have much room to spare.

PS: I also find it interesting that the website heavily advertises "without membranes," yet the roof structure includes two of them 😉