ᐅ Any experience with the Cisco SG250X-24P-K9-EU switch?

Created on: 23 Jun 2020 18:41

Hello everyone,

I am considering using/acquiring a managed switch for the future home network.

In my opinion, it should meet all necessary requirements: Layer 3, routing, IGMPv3, VLAN without a router...

Does anyone have experience with this device or any other comments?

Best regards

untergasse4324 Jun 2020 16:06

#13

Double NAT is not an issue specific to Ubiquiti. It always occurs when you have two routers connected in series. So, if you only connect a Ubiquiti switch to a Fritzbox, you won't encounter this problem. By the way, this issue would be resolved by having a pure modem in front of a router (in UBNT's case, the USG).

Tarnari24 Jun 2020 16:08

#14

All clear to me. As far as I know, the Ubiquiti switch is not a layer 3 (L3) switch.

Edit: I just saw that the Pro apparently is...
Edit2: and extremely expensive

Tassimat24 Jun 2020 16:11

#15

So DSL connection -> modem -> USG -> switch -> Fritzbox for telephone?

untergasse4324 Jun 2020 16:13

#16

Tarnari schrieb:

I understand everything. To my knowledge, the Ubiquiti switch is not an L3 switch.

No, but that wouldn’t matter if you only had a modem in front of the USG. Then you would only have the 1 Gbps bottleneck if you have a lot of traffic between the VLANs.

Tassimat schrieb:

So DSL connection -> modem -> USG -> switch -> Fritzbox for phone?

Correct.

dhd8224 Jun 2020 16:15

#17

Which Ubiquiti switch are you referring to? There are different models available.

I have two ES-24-250 Watt switches, and they also support Layer 3 routing.

Tarnari24 Jun 2020 16:15

#18

As I said, what really puts me off is the hassle with Magenta TV. Sure, there are solutions, but no one seems to be truly satisfied with them.

ᐅ Any experience with the Cisco SG250X-24P-K9-EU switch?

Reaktionen