ᐅ Floor plan of a new multi-family house with 3 residential units, total living area approximately 350 m²

Created on: 29 Aug 2024 13:40
N
nevzatc21
Hello everyone,

I have purchased a plot of land and would like to hear your opinions on the design.
The plan is for a multi-family house with 3 residential units, one apartment per floor. Possibly, we would use a room in the ground floor stairwell area as a laundry, storage, and utility room. The house should have a modern and functional layout, ideally with plenty of natural light and an open living, dining, and kitchen area. It is also very important to me that each apartment has a balcony or terrace where residents can comfortably sit and spend time.

Here is the brief:

Zoning plan / restrictions
Plot size – 523m² (5,628 sq ft), 19m (62 ft) wide, 27.5m (90 ft) deep, rectangular
Slope – no
Site coverage ratio – 0.4
Floor area ratio – 0.8
Building setbacks, building line, and boundaries – 5m (16 ft) from the street, 3m (10 ft) from neighbors, no boundary restrictions to the garden
Edge development – "On every building plot, a free-growing hedge or trimmed deciduous hedge must be planted and maintained along at least one plot boundary." Nothing more was found in the zoning plan.
Number of parking spaces – 1.5 per residential unit
Number of floors – 2 full stories
Roof type – all roof types permitted
Architectural style – no specifications
Orientation – south-facing
Maximum heights / restrictions – main building max 11m (36 ft), stairwell max 7m (23 ft)
Other requirements – none that have significant influence on the design

Client requirements
Style, roof type, building type – modern multi-family house with 2 full stories plus a recessed top floor with a flat or mono-pitched roof
Basement, floors – no basement, 2 full stories plus recessed top floor
Number of residents, age – unknown, approx. 3-5 people per unit
Room requirements on ground and upper floors – ground and first floors approx. 130m² (1,400 sq ft), attic floor approx. 90m² (970 sq ft)
Office: family use or home office? – family use
Occasional overnight guests per year – few
Open or closed architecture – no preference
Conservative or modern construction – modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island – open kitchen without kitchen island (too expensive 😀)
Number of dining places – 1 per unit
Fireplace – no
Music / stereo wall – no
Balcony, roof terrace – yes, balcony is very important for the apartments on the first and attic floors
Garage, carport – no, outdoor parking spaces
Utility garden, greenhouse – no
Other wishes / special features / daily routine, including reasons for these choices – It is important to me that the apartments are designed so tenants want and can live there long-term. Therefore, I am considering a laundry room on the ground floor that can also serve as a utility and storage room. Otherwise, the apartments should have sufficient space on the balconies.

House design
Designed by – my brother is a civil engineer who designed the plans
What do you particularly like? Why? – large living, dining, and kitchen area on the ground floor, number and size of bedrooms
What do you dislike? Why? – the terraces on the ground floor are located at the west corner with the exit there, and the balconies on the first and attic floors are in the east corner
Estimated price according to architect / planner: €520,000 including VAT. I am contracting the trades myself.
Personal budget limit for the house, including fixtures: €520,000
Preferred heating technology: district heating is more or less required by the city

If you had to give up something, on which details / extras could you do without?
- Could give up: open kitchen, guest toilet
- Could not give up: balcony, terrace, storage room

Why is the design like it is now? For example:
Standard design from planner? – It is already adapted to the plot conditions and our ideas. But I am not sure if it is "right" for a multi-family house. Especially the issue of balconies and the laundry/storage room—I am not sure if these all fit well.
Were client wishes implemented by the architect? Basically, all wishes were implemented. I am just not sure if our wishes are the "right" ones or if something could be better done.
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What makes the design particularly good or bad in your opinion?

Ground floor plan of a house with rooms, doors, and dimensions.


First floor plan of a house with corridor, stairwell, and several rooms.


Attic floor plan of a house with several rooms, stairwell, and dimensions.


What do you think of the designs? How do you find the layout? What do you think about the laundry/storage room on the ground floor?
What do you think about the balcony situation?

Thanks for your feedback!
nevzatc21
Y
ypg
30 Aug 2024 15:44
The source is DIN 18012 regarding utility rooms – I have also found it.

Document page: section on sizes of utility rooms; dimensions 1.8 m wide, 2.0 m high.
Y
ypg
30 Aug 2024 16:17
Here even simpler: Technical room inside the house including bicycle storage... then eventually the floor area ratio will work out.
The carports are each 3.20 x 6.00 meters (10.5 x 19.7 feet), with one parking space in front of the carport next to the technical room. The yellow area is a waste container.

Floor plan of a building: driveway, utility room, bicycles, corridor, office and bedroom
N
nevzatc21
30 Aug 2024 17:44
ypg schrieb:

Because it’s about the basics.
You come with a design that shows no parking spaces, only a double garage.
You come with a technical room that cannot be one.

Hello,

I understand your point and have provided the additional information. As I mentioned, my issue was focused on the interior of the apartments, especially balcony and terrace, so that’s why those details were not included.

The technical room of this size is adequate. It provides enough space for a district heating station, a meter cabinet, and water connection lines. Of course, larger would be better, but since I have financial goals here, I need to maximize living space and minimize utility areas. Unfortunately, that is necessary.

Now, onto the facts:

The plot is 523 sq m (5628 sq ft) with a floor-area ratio of 0.4. This means you may build approximately 210 sq m (2260 sq ft) of footprint.
Additionally, under §19 paragraph 4 of the Federal Land Use Ordinance, unless the zoning plan states otherwise, the floor-area ratio may be exceeded by up to 50% for ancillary structures.

Your house footprint is about 180 sq m (1938 sq ft) including the terrace.

That leaves you around 30 sq m (323 sq ft) of actual remaining buildable area, plus 105 sq m (1130 sq ft) (which is 50% of 209 sq m (2250 sq ft)), so a total of 135 sq m (1453 sq ft) for driveways, parking spaces, and other ancillary structures (such as sheds for equipment, bicycles, and strollers).

Your plot width is 19 meters (62 feet). If you want to designate a parking space with 6 meters (20 feet) depth (a 6x3 meter (20x10 feet) parking space corresponds to a comfortable, properly sized parking space fitting the house and apartment; we’ll ignore width for now), you’ll need 7–8 meters (23–26 feet) in front of the house. This is because you must be able to get from the parking space at the boundary to the house entrance without leaving the property. The bumper should also not protrude onto the sidewalk. Also, the parking space should not be right up against the foundation, and accessibility must be ensured for at least 1.5 parking spaces.

So, 19 x 7 meters (62 x 23 feet) minimum already equals 133 sq m (1432 sq ft). Add two side parking spaces, and the total rises to 169 sq m (1818 sq ft). Then you have sheds and paths to the sheds: shed footprint 2 x 6 sq m (2 x 65 sq ft), plus one meter (3 feet) clearance/pathway to the parking spaces, which roughly adds up to 151 sq m (1626 sq ft). That is already over the allowed limit.

Your marked parking spaces on the ground floor (accessible) show a parking space that cannot be accessible. It looks onto another person’s vehicle. The sheds block the windows of the ground floor apartment.

And yes: tandem parking spaces are only permissible under certain conditions. Assuming that half a parking space can also be a tandem space, your surface use still far exceeds reasonable limits. §19 paragraph 4 of the Land Use Ordinance is already quite generous, but exceeding even this amount is likely not approvable.
In total, including the missing technical room where you can approach the equipment: rough summary -> new

As stated above, I must optimize areas. In particular, the parking spaces should not exceed 5 meters (16 feet) depth. Width is not the issue. Also, not the entire area in front of the house will be built over. In reality, 2–3 meters (6.5–10 feet) along the street frontage will remain undeveloped.
Therefore, 16 x 6 meters (52 x 20 feet) for parking including access paths should be assumed = 96 sq m (1033 sq ft). That should leave enough space for sheds and two additional parking spaces.

The question arises: is it reasonable to expect a four-family apartment to store four family bicycles plus another eight bicycles in a 6 sq m (65 sq ft) shed?

It should definitely be a bit larger. 9 sq m (97 sq ft) should be sufficient.
N
nevzatc21
30 Aug 2024 17:46
Enrico02 schrieb:

It depends on the local parking regulations of the municipality, so it’s best to check directly whether this is allowed. Generally, enclosed parking spaces usually don’t meet the mandatory requirements.

Good point, I will clarify this specifically.
For our current house, it was explicitly allowed in the development plan (the area in front of the carport can be designated as a parking space). In the current plan, I cannot find such a formulation. We will check with the authorities, it would be great if they accept it.
N
nevzatc21
30 Aug 2024 17:48
nordanney schrieb:

Both belong together. You can design a great floor plan, but it might not make sense on the plot due to factors like orientation.
What do you understand by the site plan? The location of the building on the plot, including adjacent structures, or the location of the plot within the development area?
N
nordanney
30 Aug 2024 18:06
nevzatc21 schrieb:

What do you understand by the site plan? The location of the building on the plot including the surrounding structures, or the location of the plot within the development area?
The first one is already great, and if it also includes the surrounding buildings, perfect. Depending on the plot, of course with elevation details (which is not the case for you).

Have you spoken with the local authority about buying out parking spaces? That would simplify the whole issue.