ᐅ Single-family house, 1.5 stories, 155 sqm

Created on: 4 Jan 2025 15:20
M
Mone_04
Hello everyone,
we would like to share our design with you to get feedback and suggestions for improvements, as well as to identify any potential issues.
With the optimized design, we plan to approach construction companies for quotes. All the architects we contacted have long waiting times, and since we need to apply for funding in spring, that would not be feasible timing-wise.

What do we want to build?
A single-family house with a maximum of 160 m² (approximately 1720 sq ft) according to the living space regulations (with the terrace counted proportionally) in order to qualify for funding.

Development plan / restrictions
Plot size: 645 m² (approximately 0.16 acres)
Slope: yes, slight. The plot is about 28 m (92 feet) long and rises about 1.5 – 2 m (5 – 6.5 feet) from the street (south) upwards.
Site coverage ratio: 0.4
Floor area ratio: 0.8
Building envelope, building line and boundary: The building boundary is 2.5 m (8 feet) from the front and rear (as viewed from the street). Roof overhangs may project up to 1 m (3 feet) beyond the building boundaries, provided the setback requirements of the state building code BW are met. Garages may be built outside the buildable areas.
Border development: Neighbor’s garage to the west on the boundary, see site plan. Both neighbors east and west have already built. On the opposite street side (south) is still a free building plot. North is a field with no planned development.
Number of parking spaces: 2, preferably a double garage.
Number of floors: 2 possible.
Roof shape: free choice.
Style: free choice.
Orientation: southwest (SW).
Maximum height limits: maximum height of 8.5 m (28 feet) measured from the ground floor level to the highest point of the roof structure (for roofs up to 7°, only 7.5 m / 25 feet height allowed).
Other requirements: ground floor height max. 0.5 m (1.6 feet) above street level; mandatory photovoltaic system (BW), mandatory cistern (~6 m³ (1580 gallons)).

Client requirements
Style, roof shape, building type: classic gable roof house, 30° roof pitch, 1.4 m (4.6 feet) knee wall.
Basement, floors: no basement, 1.5 floors.
Number of occupants, age: 3 persons, ages 32, 28, 0.
Space requirements on ground floor (GF) and upper floor (UF):
GF: living-dining-kitchen approx. 45 m² (484 sq ft), office/guest room approx. 10 m² (108 sq ft), utility/technical room approx. 8-10 m² (86-108 sq ft), shower bathroom approx. 4 m² (43 sq ft).
UF (all net floor area): bedroom approx. 14 m² (151 sq ft), bathroom with laundry room approx. 16 m² (172 sq ft), 2 children’s rooms approx. 16 m² (172 sq ft) each.
Office: family use or home office?
Since we currently plan for only one child, the office on the GF should serve as storage and guest room; the second "children’s room" will be used as an office. Approximately 15 guests per year; home office about 3 days per week.
Open or closed architecture: open.
Conservative or modern style: more or less modern.
Open kitchen, kitchen island: yes.
Number of dining seats: normally 4, extendable up to 12.
Fireplace: no.
Music/stereo wall: no.
Balcony, roof terrace: no.
Garage, carport: yes, preferably double garage at least 6 x 7 m (20 x 23 feet).
Utility garden, greenhouse: no.
Additional wishes / special features / daily routine, including reasons for certain choices or exclusions:
  • The kitchen should not be visible from the sofa (when sitting).
  • The living-dining area with kitchen should be the “heart” of the house.
  • The shower bathroom and stairs (and if possible the guest room) should not be accessible through the dirt zone at the entrance door.
  • Sufficient cloakroom space.
  • Washing machine & dryer in the bathroom on the upper floor, as laundry accumulates there, but separated from the children’s rooms by the hallway.
  • Gable or dormer facing southeast (street side) due to the view.
  • No dormers or more costly architectural features due to cost reasons.
  • Terrace mainly on the southwest side to catch evening sun. It will later be covered with a pergola. A 3 m (10 feet) lift-and-slide door would be ideal.
  • Ground floor ceiling height at least 2.5 m (8.2 feet), upper floor 2.4 m (7.9 feet) is acceptable.


House design
Who designed it: Do-it-Yourself.
What do you like most and why?
  • Spacious living-dining-kitchen area with kitchen not visible from the living room.
  • Light-flooded living spaces.
  • Possibility to later separate the living room with, for example, glass elements.
  • Space available for furniture placement in living room.
  • Modern feel due to open staircase.
  • Staircase accessible from living area (natural access to bathroom or bedroom).
  • Visual axis from entrance to garden through window behind the stairs, without having a view of the entrance door from the rooms.
  • Implementation of basic wishes (number of rooms, orientation, functionality, etc.).
  • Minimal actual hallway area on ground floor.

What do you dislike and why?
  • No separation from upper floor possible.
  • Head clearance to the first landing of the stairs is critical.
  • Overhang in front of left children’s room is wasted space.
  • No window in the shower bathroom on the ground floor.
  • Dirt corridor & relevant rooms are separated.
  • If a second child comes, there is little storage space.
  • With about 155 m² (1668 sq ft), relatively large (and therefore expensive).
  • Exterior appearance, but we have not focused on this as a priority so far.
  • Southwest terrace has a possible sliding door that is too small (currently 1.5 m / 5 feet), so this door is planned 3 m (10 feet) slightly to the south instead.
  • No pantry; we would consider a small cupboard and fridge-freezer in the technical room if space permits.
  • Very long driveway.
  • Unfortunately relatively close to neighbor’s plot on the southwest side.


Cost estimate by architect/planner: -
Personal budget limit for the house, including fittings: €520,000 (around US $570,000), excluding landscaping, must be reduced by personal labor.
Preferred heating system: not decided yet, no fossil fuels allowed, likely air-to-water heat pump.

If you had to give up something, on which details or expansions could you do without:
  • Large guest/work/storage room.
  • Shower on ground floor.

What could you not do without:
  • Laundry room on upper floor.
  • Side entrance to the house.
  • Generous living-dining-kitchen area.


Why is the design the way it is?
We approached three construction companies, received some good but too large plans, and some standard plans that did not fit at all. Therefore, we studied floor plans intensively and tried to create a design with as few compromises as possible. Because of our wish for a side entrance and the living-dining-kitchen area arranged as an L-shape on the southwest side of the house and the two children’s rooms facing south without dormers or small gables, we couldn’t find 1.5-story designs from prefab house providers that fit.
After considering many other designs, we ultimately drew this one ourselves, which we basically like best and is just acceptable in size. The bay window for the stairs will probably cause extra costs, but we hope to compensate by omitting a flat roof and extending the roof line.
The ground floor ceiling height is an assumption; the stairs are planned for a floor height of 2.83 m (9.3 feet), with 26 cm (10 inches) tread depth and 18 cm (7 inches) riser height.

In addition to comments and suggestions on the floor plan, we also have the following questions:
  • Is the size of the living area including the stairs structurally feasible without issues?
  • How complicated and expensive would ventilation for the shower bathroom on the ground floor be?
  • Is the head clearance for the staircase sufficient?
  • Are knee wall windows, as planned in the children’s room, worthwhile? We see advantages in improved lighting for a small seating area and ventilation possibilities via a tilt window.

Thank you very much in advance for your help! I will gladly provide any information available if needed.
Please be kind, this is my first post and
Grundriss eines Hauses mit Wohn-Ess-Koch, Diele, Duschbad, Technik, Gäste-Arbeit/Abstell, Garage.

Grundriss eines Apartments mit Schlafzimmer, Bad, Diele, HWR und zwei Zimmern.

Ansicht eines modernen Hauses mit dunklem Ziegeldach, heller Fassade, zentrale Tür und Fenster.

Luftbild eines Baugrundstücks mit schwarzer Gebäudeskiz auf weißem Plan neben Wohnhäusern.

Modernes zweistöckiges Einfamilienhaus mit schwarzem Dach, Terrasse unter Pergola und Garten.

Grundriss eines Hauses: Wohnzimmer, Küche, Essbereich, Diele, Bad, Arbeitszimmer, Garage.

Grundriss eines Hauses: Schlafzimmer, zwei Kinderzimmer, Bad, Diele und HWR

Grundstücks-Lageplan: Großes Haus zentral, links Nebengebäude, rechts Anbau, Zufahrt unten.
A
Arauki11
6 Jan 2025 19:25
wiltshire schrieb:

That’s normal, which is why having good building partners is so important – and why discussions about "how do I want to live" matter more than just the seemingly obvious "what should the house look like and how much does each detail cost."
That is exactly what should be determined. Of course, there are very sensible "constraints" to consider when building a house. But beyond that, you should really be brave and trust your own feelings and individuality. In fact, nowadays it is even harder to truly figure this out for yourself, given all the diverse influences you’re exposed to or subject yourself to. Question the assumed rule that a south-facing position is best, for your own needs.
K a t j a schrieb:

You must not forget that you spend 90% of the time outside in summer.
It’s different for me, even though I am someone who loves fresh air. When it’s warm outside, I like to be indoors during the hottest hours and run the air conditioning on a low setting. Too much heat is uncomfortable for me, just like rooms that are too warm. I would never lie in the sun, while others prefer to sunbathe. My wife likes the sun, but even she rarely sits directly in it.
K a t j a schrieb:

So with a north terrace, it’s mainly about bringing light into the house anyway.
That’s exactly what I would do here. For example, we love having large windows, which really make the living space feel much bigger. We don’t have a full south-facing side, which might otherwise cause problems with overheating and especially direct, glaring sunlight. In that respect, I see the north side as an advantage or at least a lesser disadvantage.

Maybe you could sketch a plot plan showing those peaceful or sunny spots so you can imagine living both inside and outside as a whole. You could place a nice garden shed there with a lounge terrace, a fridge, a coffee machine, etc., for use in summer.

If you set aside the "usual suspects" like just one terrace next to the house, a trampoline, mesh fencing, and so on, things you see elsewhere, and imagine your plot more freely, you may find some exciting solutions.
Mone_04 schrieb:

Until now, we’ve been very focused on the south garden.
If your focus is too narrow, it gets difficult and you’ll be disappointed quickly. There’s no need for that fixation. You are going to develop this plot, so some things just won’t be there... but then you get other things instead.

For your last floor plan, as a fan of open spaces, I could imagine making the partition wall between the hallway and living room half-height; and regarding the furniture layout you mentioned, I would break away from the usual and maybe consider two small sofas or individual, light armchairs loosely arranged, rather than the standard 3-2-1 setup with the TV in front. The windows could be adjusted accordingly.

What I don’t fully understand yet are the various ancillary rooms that maybe could be combined. On the ground floor, there is a technical room and storage/work area separated, and upstairs a fairly large utility room (which could possibly include the technical and storage functions) plus another storage room that I would rather assign to the bedroom or use as a dressing room. If you are indeed planning the upstairs bathroom without a bathtub, it could free up 1–2 square meters (square feet) as well.
11ant6 Jan 2025 19:50
K a t j a schrieb:

By the way, I also find the design in #20 quite interesting. I can hardly understand your objections, but never mind.

If only because I didn’t raise any objections to that design. I merely recommended not building a niche for the heat recovery ventilation/technical room tower but rather to place it plainly somewhere in the spacious utility room, without such special features. I didn’t criticize the original poster’s design and don’t think it’s bad either; I just consider yours more ready for inquiry.
K a t j a schrieb:

I definitely wouldn’t do that, because in my opinion, it’s not even certain yet where the house will be located.

What’s stopping you from already asking a contractor what similar options they might have in their portfolio for a design like yours?
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
K
kbt09
6 Jan 2025 20:12
Especially since this laundry tower becomes a disaster at the latest when the machines have right-hand hinged doors. Then you end up pressed into your corner.
W
wiltshire
6 Jan 2025 20:24
Mone_04 schrieb:

Here is a preliminary draft that is similar in size.
How easy it is to criticize, and I hope what I write is more helpful than overwhelming.
I went through the “circulation routes” and noticed that the utility room can only be accessed through the single bathroom. You always have to go through two doors with all the laundry, and if someone is in the bathroom, you are either locked in or locked out – maybe not an issue with small children, but once they become teenagers, it can become a potential daily annoyance.

You could rotate the staircase by 90 degrees if you keep the pantry underneath. That opens up different possibilities for rearranging the rooms upstairs. However, @11ant’s approach to plan the upper floor first and then the ground floor is definitely a better strategy than just rotating the staircase casually.

The tip to bring natural light into the roof space from above is very valuable.

Yes, the technical room seems too small for today’s typical equipment (heat pump, hot water tank, power storage). One option might be to move the technical room upstairs and the utility room downstairs.

To balance the many requirements downstairs (open living, work, technical room, or utility room), I would consider movable walls and how different configurations can optimally meet each need at different times. This will also make much better use of the hallway area. If the idea seems too unusual, at least experiment with different layouts. It frees your mind and creates space for new ideas. Sometimes something very obvious emerges, which just hasn’t been thought of yet.
W
wiltshire
6 Jan 2025 20:27
kbt09 schrieb:

Especially since this laundry tower becomes a disaster as soon as the machines have doors with right-hand hinges. Then you end up pressed into the corner.
For most machines nowadays, you can change the door hinge with just a few screws. We have a washer and dryer from AEG, now 7 years old. That was already possible then.
K
kbt09
6 Jan 2025 21:24
wiltshire schrieb:

Nowadays, with most machines, you can change the stop using just a few screws.
And even if that’s possible, the door hits the wall when opened... given the size of the room, there’s really no need to create such a recessed niche. Besides that, I also agree with you regarding the positioning and access to the utility room. Enclosed rooms are usually not ideal.