ᐅ Floor plan discussion and suggestions for improvement

Created on: 25 Jan 2022 21:09
S
SoL
Hello everyone,

We are starting to plan an alternative to the costly renovation of our house. So far, we have had our first discussions and collaboration with a general contractor of our choice.
I would appreciate honest feedback so that we can identify any overlooked issues now, rather than during construction.

Summary:

Development plan exists, few restrictions, maximum eaves height of 8m (26 ft) might cause some issues for us.

Plot size: 710m² (7,645 ft²)
Slope: No
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: Hip roof
Style: Townhouse / Urban villa
Orientation: Plot faces northwest, see attachment
Maximum height/limits: 8m (26 ft) eaves height, 5m (16 ft) setback from northern and western property boundaries for the building, due to requested landscaping

Owners’ requirements
Style, roof type, building type: Flexible; overall package must be appealing
No basement, two full stories
Number of occupants: 6 persons (ages 38, 37, 8, 6, 2, 2)
Space needs: 5 bedrooms on the upper floor, living room, dining room, kitchen, 2 offices on the ground floor, at least 2 showers
Offices: Both offices necessary, 1 fully dedicated home office (regardless of pandemic), 1 study for a teacher
Overnight guests per year: 6; can sleep elsewhere or in one of the offices
Open or closed layout: Flexible
Conservative or modern construction: Flexible
Kitchen: Preferably open with an island (for food prep, not for cooking at)
Number of dining seats: 6
Fireplace: Provision for a wood stove, thus chimney required
2 carports, no garage

Special features: A cleaning area/utility room “mudroom” is desired because our children tend to be messy. Children’s bedrooms to be approximately the same size (+/-).

House design
Designed by: Planner from a construction company

What we like:
- Simple floor plan
- 2 offices
- 5 bedrooms on one level
- Bedrooms roughly the same size
- Kitchen easily furnishable
- Not larger than 200m² (2,153 ft²) (cleaning, construction costs)
- Fits the plot well
- Short access for groceries (directly into kitchen)

What we don’t like:
- The path to the living room goes through the kitchen
- Relatively large circulation areas
- No pantry

Price estimate according to architect/planner: approximately €440,000 (about $490,000) excluding painting and floor coverings (except tiles, which are included for kitchen, entrance, hallway on ground floor, and bathrooms)
Personal price limit for the house including fittings: €540,000 (about $600,000), including fittings and additional construction costs, land extra. Can be increased if needed up to €640,000 (about $710,000)
Preferred heating technology: Heat pump or gas

What can you do without? Which details or extras can you skip?
- Can omit 1 office if the corresponding bedroom is 3m² (32 ft²) bigger (a desk corner instead)

Why does the design look like this now?
We found a standard design that we were able to adapt to our needs with relatively few changes.

What is the most important/basic question about the floor plan, summarized in 130 characters?
What daily challenges do you see with 4 children that we might have missed? What haven’t we considered?

The house is planned for the top left corner plot (circled) on the site map.
The floor plans have unfortunately been manually altered, so my revisions regarding room names are included. The guest room is actually office 2... The revised room sizes are approximate.

Thank you very much and best regards,
SoL

Clear development plan of a residential area with parcels, streets A–C and green spaces.


Two-story floor plan: ground floor with kitchen/living area; upper floor with children’s rooms.
H
haydee
30 Jan 2022 08:12
I’m afraid the house might be a bit over budget.
There is a lack of storage space and quite a lot of circulation area.

With an eaves height of 8 m (26 ft), the zoning plan allows for an attic. Please enter all the details.
K1300S30 Jan 2022 08:15
SoL schrieb:

The attic won't work because of the 8m (26 ft) height; the attic space won't be properly usable, especially since only 2 full floors are allowed, no 2.5 floors.
Didn't you say something about 8m (26 ft) eaves height? Or did you mean building height? (By the way, there are no half floors.)
S
SoL
30 Jan 2022 08:25
Yes, you are right, it was my mistake... The ridge height is of course 8 meters (26 feet), not the eaves height.
That is why I have concerns / exclude the attic as living space. With an eaves height of 8 meters (26 feet), there would be no problem, correct.
S
Steinaufstein4
30 Jan 2022 11:05
Hello SoL,
we have a very similar floor plan to the one you designed (the building permit / planning permission is currently being finalized). However, we only have one home office and the bedroom is on the ground floor.
I just wanted to encourage you. For 200 m² (2,150 sq ft), your budget should be sufficient.
However, an 8 m (26 ft) eaves height wouldn’t be enough for two full stories. But apparently, you are adjusting the total height. What roof pitch are you planning?
Regarding the floor plan, I would be bothered by the passage through the kitchen. And I think I would forgo the open space (void) there and instead plan a laundry room in that area.
K1300S30 Jan 2022 11:39
Steinaufstein4 schrieb:

However, 8 m (26 feet) eaves height would not have been sufficient for two full stories.
Don’t confuse him even more. With 8 m (26 feet), two full stories are generally no problem without special circumstances. Building height or ridge height of 8 m (26 feet) is a different matter, which seems to be the case here, but even for that it will be sufficient if a very shallow pitched or even flat roof is chosen.
S
Steinaufstein4
30 Jan 2022 11:51
K1300S schrieb:

Don’t confuse him further. A building height of 8 m (26 feet) usually allows for two full stories without any issues. An 8 m (26 feet) building or ridge height is something different, which seems to be the case here, but even for that, a very shallow pitched or flat roof would be sufficient.


Oh, sorry, we have a 6 m (20 feet) eave height. That was tricky. I made a mistake.