Hello dear members,
I discovered your lovely forum thanks to Google. Unfortunately, as is often the case, a problem has brought me here.
We are building an extension onto an existing semi-detached house in Baden-Württemberg.
We are building on a slab foundation. The friendly neighbor built his half with a basement.
We live 70 kilometers (about 43 miles) away from the construction site.
Therefore, with both of us working and having two children, we cannot be at the site all the time.
Yesterday morning, the workers began setting the formwork for the slab foundation.
When I arrived at the site yesterday, my friendly neighbor was already there waiting for me.
He yelled at me quite loudly and was extremely angry.
He said that the slab foundation towards his side was insulated only with Styrodur (extruded polystyrene).
One of the workers tried to explain that in addition to the Styrodur, a 4 cm (1.6 inch) soundproofing wall would be installed along the house.
Still, he did not calm down.
He just kept yelling. He said he would take pictures and that he would refuse to pay.
We have no intention of demanding any money from him.
I was really shocked!!!
Actually, he should be worried, since he built 3 cm (1.2 inches) of his house’s total length over our property boundary.
What is the legal situation here?
I told my husband about it.
He wanted to see a lawyer right away.
For me, maintaining peace with the neighbor is more important.
Please excuse my spelling mistakes and my lack of knowledge. I have two children and need to keep them happy at the same time.
Thank you,
Sandra
I discovered your lovely forum thanks to Google. Unfortunately, as is often the case, a problem has brought me here.
We are building an extension onto an existing semi-detached house in Baden-Württemberg.
We are building on a slab foundation. The friendly neighbor built his half with a basement.
We live 70 kilometers (about 43 miles) away from the construction site.
Therefore, with both of us working and having two children, we cannot be at the site all the time.
Yesterday morning, the workers began setting the formwork for the slab foundation.
When I arrived at the site yesterday, my friendly neighbor was already there waiting for me.
He yelled at me quite loudly and was extremely angry.
He said that the slab foundation towards his side was insulated only with Styrodur (extruded polystyrene).
One of the workers tried to explain that in addition to the Styrodur, a 4 cm (1.6 inch) soundproofing wall would be installed along the house.
Still, he did not calm down.
He just kept yelling. He said he would take pictures and that he would refuse to pay.
We have no intention of demanding any money from him.
I was really shocked!!!
Actually, he should be worried, since he built 3 cm (1.2 inches) of his house’s total length over our property boundary.
What is the legal situation here?
I told my husband about it.
He wanted to see a lawyer right away.
For me, maintaining peace with the neighbor is more important.
Please excuse my spelling mistakes and my lack of knowledge. I have two children and need to keep them happy at the same time.
Thank you,
Sandra
C
chand198619 Apr 2020 18:51Sandrasix schrieb:
His argument is that if you replace the disruptive children with people of black skin color, it would be considered racism. But "disruptive children" cause disturbance through their behavior, not their appearance. This is not just a weak comparison; it’s not a comparison at all.
Again: There is a certain framework, even if not clearly defined, within which children’s behavior must be tolerated, even if it is perceived as annoying. They are louder than adults. That is allowed.
However, constantly tolerating your own children screaming at maximum decibel levels, shrugging it off as "natural" behavior and imposing it on others is a poor judgment of what is socially acceptable and what is not. This goes beyond the aforementioned framework and, due to its impact on others, cannot simply be excluded from discussion by claiming it is a parenting style and a private matter.
The claim that only people with children can have a say is a cheap dismissive argument. I do not need to perform a task myself to judge the quality of its result. Without being a carpenter, I can recognize a bad cabinet. Without growing fruit, I can assess the quality of apples. And without raising children of my own, I can distinguish well-behaved children from less well-behaved ones and evaluate their behavior as acceptable or not. If someone cries a lot, I hear it with my ears, not with children of my own.
Whether their own parents would agree with me is completely irrelevant, because, sorry to have to say this: No one is less objective in judging a child than their own parents. I can assert that with 100% certainty from my long experience as a caregiver. And this is naturally designed that way for good reasons, so it is not a criticism, just an observation.
And there are also advantages to not having children. Still, of course, it is a shame.
Otherwise: a driver’s license for children means that every
One of the best comments here in the forum!
Otherwise: a driver’s license for children means that every
chand1986 schrieb:
But "annoying children" cause their effect through an activity, not through their appearance. That is not just a weak argument, it is not even a comparison.
Again: there is a framework, even if not clearly defined, in which the activities of children must be tolerated, even if they are perceived as disturbing. They are louder than adults. And they are allowed to be.
But constantly yelling by one’s own children at the highest decibel level, shrugged off as “natural” behavior and simply imposed on others, shows poor judgment about what is socially acceptable and what is not. It lies outside the mentioned framework and cannot be excluded from discussion as a parenting style that is supposedly a private matter because of its impact on others.
The argument that you can only participate in the discussion if you have your own children is a cheap shut-down tactic. I do not have to do the work myself to judge the quality of the mere result. Without being a carpenter, I recognize a bad cabinet. Without growing fruit, I can judge the quality of apples. And without raising my own children, I can distinguish well-behaved children from less well-behaved ones and assess children’s behavior as acceptable or not. If someone screams often, I hear it with my ears, not through having children of my own.
Whether their own parents would agree with me plays the smallest role because, sorry to have to say this: nobody is less objective in judging a child than its own parents. I can state that with 100% certainty after long experience as a caregiver. And nature has certainly set it up that way for good reasons, so no accusation, just an observation.
One of the best comments here in the forum!
S
Sandrasix19 Apr 2020 19:19chand1986 schrieb:
But "disruptive children" cause disturbance through their actions, not through their appearance. That is not just an unfair comparison, it is not even comparable.
Again: There is a framework—although not clearly defined—within which children’s activities must be tolerated, even if they are perceived as disturbing. They are louder than adults. And that is acceptable.
However, constantly yelling children at top volume, shrugged off as simply “natural” behavior, and forcing this upon others in the environment, reflects poor judgment about what is appropriate in social interactions and what is not. It falls outside the aforementioned framework and, due to its impact on others, cannot simply be excluded from discussion as a parenting style that is purely a private matter.
The argument that only parents are entitled to an opinion is a cheap dismissal. I do not need to perform a task myself to judge the quality of the end result. Without being a carpenter, I can recognize a poorly made cabinet. Without growing fruit myself, I can judge the quality of apples. And without raising children of my own, I can distinguish well-behaved children from less well-behaved ones and evaluate whether children’s behavior is acceptable or not. If someone screams often, I hear that with my ears, not with my own children.
Whether the child’s own parents agree with me is of negligible importance because, pardon me saying this: no one is less objective in judging a child than his or her own parents. I can say that with full certainty after many years of caregiving experience. That is also naturally designed for good reasons, so no criticism intended, just an observation. Chapeau!!!!
Great how you wrote that❤️
C
chand198619 Apr 2020 19:35Sandrasix schrieb:
Hats off!!!!
Great how you wrote that❤That is really kind of you as the thread starter, especially since I - unfortunately often when I join in - tend to go completely off-topic again. But with some topics, I just can’t help myself. Just let me know briefly if it becomes a nuisance.S
Sandrasix19 Apr 2020 19:55chand1986 schrieb:
That’s really kind coming from you as the thread creator, especially since I tend to go off-topic quite often when I join in. But with some subjects, I just can’t help myself. Just let me know briefly if it becomes a problem.No, no. It’s definitely not a problem!
Even though we have all strayed from the original topic, I find the discussion very stimulating and interesting.
I basically accept every opinion.
However, I really liked yours!
You also expressed yourself very well.
Besides, I was helped too!
All good.
This whole discussion—I can’t expect everyone to like my children, but older people want respect, so why can’t children expect that too?!
Kids can be annoying, and I even agree that older people might want to move away because of that, even though it’s unfortunate.
Still, I stand by it—I don’t like those older people who immediately say, “Oh God, the family has kids, I can’t stand these brats, I’m selling my house.” (It depends on the situation; some people just can’t stand children, just like some people don’t like foreigners, etc.)
Come on, give those children a chance, maybe they are actually very sweet?!
My grandma was 90 and always delighted when she saw children, she would always have something sweet for them.
When I was a child, my neighbor was like that too, which was wonderful… “the grandma next door.”
Two years ago, I was on a streetcar, and a woman was breastfeeding her baby in front of her friend. The looks from people…
I just had to say, “You don’t have to look at it!”
I’m male and heterosexual, but decency is important—breastfeeding in public is perfectly normal to me.
What’s not normal are couples making out in public… I can handle that as an adult, but children cannot.
But when a dog comes too close to someone, sniffs them, and keeps barking, people say, “Oh, he’s very friendly, just curious.”
Suddenly, that is considered normal.
Live and let live—with respect and tolerance!
PEACE!!
Kids can be annoying, and I even agree that older people might want to move away because of that, even though it’s unfortunate.
Still, I stand by it—I don’t like those older people who immediately say, “Oh God, the family has kids, I can’t stand these brats, I’m selling my house.” (It depends on the situation; some people just can’t stand children, just like some people don’t like foreigners, etc.)
Come on, give those children a chance, maybe they are actually very sweet?!
My grandma was 90 and always delighted when she saw children, she would always have something sweet for them.
When I was a child, my neighbor was like that too, which was wonderful… “the grandma next door.”
Two years ago, I was on a streetcar, and a woman was breastfeeding her baby in front of her friend. The looks from people…
I just had to say, “You don’t have to look at it!”
I’m male and heterosexual, but decency is important—breastfeeding in public is perfectly normal to me.
What’s not normal are couples making out in public… I can handle that as an adult, but children cannot.
But when a dog comes too close to someone, sniffs them, and keeps barking, people say, “Oh, he’s very friendly, just curious.”
Suddenly, that is considered normal.
Live and let live—with respect and tolerance!
PEACE!!