Hello everyone,
Recently, I shared a plot and floor plan layout in a thread, which you can find here...
https://www.hausbau-forum.de/threads/grundrissplanung-Bungalow-170qm.31445/
Since that plan wasn’t well received, I would like to present a new rough concept showing how we plan to arrange the house, garage, carport, and storage room for bicycles, gardening tools, etc.
AR = Storage room, serves as a cellar replacement
G = Garage
CP = Carport
H = House
The shaded area represents the driveway. The main entrance will be located near the garage. The distance between the garage/storage and the house will be about 1.9 m (6 ft). We haven’t decided yet regarding the terrace, but I could imagine it being on the southeast side (rear) or extending from southeast to southwest (around the back and around the corner). For the bungalow dimensions, I used 16.5 m x 13 m (54 ft x 43 ft) as I think that will work. It would be even better if the bungalow is narrower (starting at 12 m / 39 ft), so the house can be positioned further forward. The disadvantage of the bungalow is that with a 13 m (43 ft) width, the house needs to be set back 2 m (6.5 ft) to the rear (southeast), which “loses” some usable plot space, as there isn’t much built at the front.
Questions:
Is the distance of approximately 1.9 m (6 ft) between garage and house sufficient?
What do you think if the entire northeast side of the house is occupied with “objects”?
What do you think of the new layout?
I found a floor plan sized 12.9 m x 16.5 m (42 ft x 54 ft) that might fit, with minor adjustments. Where the terrace is shown, I would place my home office, so it would no longer be a U-shape. See the attachment.
Recently, I shared a plot and floor plan layout in a thread, which you can find here...
https://www.hausbau-forum.de/threads/grundrissplanung-Bungalow-170qm.31445/
Since that plan wasn’t well received, I would like to present a new rough concept showing how we plan to arrange the house, garage, carport, and storage room for bicycles, gardening tools, etc.
AR = Storage room, serves as a cellar replacement
G = Garage
CP = Carport
H = House
The shaded area represents the driveway. The main entrance will be located near the garage. The distance between the garage/storage and the house will be about 1.9 m (6 ft). We haven’t decided yet regarding the terrace, but I could imagine it being on the southeast side (rear) or extending from southeast to southwest (around the back and around the corner). For the bungalow dimensions, I used 16.5 m x 13 m (54 ft x 43 ft) as I think that will work. It would be even better if the bungalow is narrower (starting at 12 m / 39 ft), so the house can be positioned further forward. The disadvantage of the bungalow is that with a 13 m (43 ft) width, the house needs to be set back 2 m (6.5 ft) to the rear (southeast), which “loses” some usable plot space, as there isn’t much built at the front.
Questions:
Is the distance of approximately 1.9 m (6 ft) between garage and house sufficient?
What do you think if the entire northeast side of the house is occupied with “objects”?
What do you think of the new layout?
I found a floor plan sized 12.9 m x 16.5 m (42 ft x 54 ft) that might fit, with minor adjustments. Where the terrace is shown, I would place my home office, so it would no longer be a U-shape. See the attachment.
Chrisi1906 schrieb:
The house is allowed to cost up to 400,000. Is that enough? Of course, I would prefer to be well below that.Yes, that is sufficient. Enough for a bungalow in the eastern region
ypg schrieb:
Yes, that's enough. Sufficient for a bungalow in the East. Well, to me it almost looks like two bungalows trying to merge. Then it gets tight again, even in Aschersleben. But 400K sounds better.
Chrisi1906 schrieb:
But I’m worried that the contractor might be reading this.I don’t really believe this would be profitable for a builder or even a property developer.https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
C
Chrisi19068 Jul 2019 17:40Great.
Now we can get back to the important matters.
If we reduce the bungalow to 150m² (1,615 sq ft) of living space and add the attic later, it doesn't look so bad after all. So much for the wedding.
@ypg So, you can imagine that the bungalow plan will work again? Or do you have concerns just because of the plot?
Now we can get back to the important matters.
If we reduce the bungalow to 150m² (1,615 sq ft) of living space and add the attic later, it doesn't look so bad after all. So much for the wedding.
@ypg So, you can imagine that the bungalow plan will work again? Or do you have concerns just because of the plot?
The bungalow floor plan variants discussed so far all still require modifications and careful fitting into the plot and building boundaries – between these measures and a developer-built property, I see little overlap. Placing a "city villa" there would seem like a far less ambitious goal.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Chrisi1906 schrieb:
So you can imagine that the bungalow plan will work out again? Or are you concerned just because of the plot?Why? The plot is definitely suitable, right?
Similar topics