ᐅ Risk of Water Damage in Timber Frame / Prefabricated Construction?

Created on: 10 May 2014 21:20
J
JayBeOh
J
JayBeOh
10 May 2014 21:20
Hello everyone,

As we are currently considering the purchase or construction of a new house, we are evaluating different building methods. In this context, we wondered whether a prefabricated house built using a timber frame construction is more vulnerable to water damage or even flooding compared to a solid masonry house.

What are your opinions on this?
I
Irgendwoabaier
10 May 2014 21:58
If the house is not located in a flood zone, where exactly should the problem be? In flood zones, I would generally try to avoid building altogether. Those who want to build underwater should consider a submarine, while building over water is better suited to pile foundations (and in that case, lightweight construction above would probably be the technically preferred method).

Regarding water damage caused by defective pipes, I suspect that with timber frame constructions, water damage can be detected earlier, located more accurately, and thus the damage can be limited. In that case, the extent of the damage itself should not be greater than with masonry or glued constructions using typical “massive-porous” building materials.

Regards,
I.
J
JayBeOh
10 May 2014 22:12
Hello Irgendwoabaier,

Thank you for your response!
Irgendwoabaier schrieb:
If the house is not located in a flood zone, where should the problem be? In a flood zone, I would generally try not to build at all. Those who want to build underwater should use a submarine; those who want to build above water are better off with pile foundations (and then lightweight construction on top would probably be the technically preferred building method).

We are not planning to build in a typical flood zone, but want to be prepared for all eventualities. For example:
In a nearby town, there has been a problem for several years where residents’ basements flooded because a local mine was shut down and its groundwater pumps were turned off. The groundwater level rose and flooded the basements. At the time of construction, a waterproof concrete basement was not considered necessary.

The main issue we are considering is the case of a water pipe burst or leak.
B
BauProjekt14
10 May 2014 22:26
Some time ago, an acquaintance experienced water damage in their prefabricated house (leak in a pipe within the floor ceiling).

The ceiling had to be completely repaired, of course... The load-bearing timber... the gypsum screed... everything was soaked through.
emer10 May 2014 22:38
When it comes to the basement, whether it supports a masonry or a timber-framed house, it will certainly not be constructed from a wooden structure. So there is no reason to discuss that. The only question then is whether it should be waterproofed concrete (WU) or not.
J
JayBeOh
10 May 2014 22:44
emer schrieb:
When it comes to the basement. Whether a concrete or timber house is built on top, the basement will certainly not be constructed from a timber structure. So there is no reason to discuss that. The only question is whether it is waterproofed or not.

You are absolutely right. However, in this thread, I am concerned about water damage above the basement. This issue is ultimately the reason why we started wondering how durable each construction method is in such unforeseen situations.