ᐅ Risk of Water Damage in Timber Frame / Prefabricated Construction?

Created on: 10 May 2014 21:20
J
JayBeOh
Hello everyone,

As we are currently considering the purchase or construction of a new house, we are evaluating different building methods. In this context, we wondered whether a prefabricated house built using a timber frame construction is more vulnerable to water damage or even flooding compared to a solid masonry house.

What are your opinions on this?
B
BauProjekt14
10 May 2014 22:46
Regarding flooding, I can add the following:

Poroton blocks filled with insulation and covered with external polystyrene are not ideal for drying. Often, the polystyrene has to be removed, and it takes some time for the perlite or mineral wool inside the brick cavities to dry again. The same applies to cavity wall constructions with facing brickwork.

In some cases, a prefabricated house may dry faster, depending on the wall build-up—there are even prefabricated houses that use polystyrene insulation on walls labeled as "XTreme Ultra Thermo Super Mega Passive Wall" to meet KfW 40 standards.

It should also be noted that a water-saturated load-bearing element loses structural strength! (What about wood in this regard?)

Generally, moisture is also present in or under the floor slab after flooding.

A wall construction using, for example, calcium silicate bricks or aerated concrete (AAC) is easier to dry in such situations (that is, without external thermal insulation composite systems or multi-layer constructions).
W
waldorf
11 May 2014 09:16
Generally, these houses are much more resistant to water. The load-bearing basic structure would only be damaged if it remains submerged for an extended period. They are built to withstand heavy rain without issue, even when water flows through the entire building. In the unlikely event that a pipe inside a wall bursts, it would probably need to be replaced. However, this is much less complicated than in a solid masonry house.

That said, I think it is not very practical to choose a house based on this criterion alone. If you did, you might as well consider earthquakes and airplane crashes.
J
JayBeOh
11 May 2014 09:27
Thanks again for the responses!

The outcome of this question is not the main criterion for choosing the construction method. We are currently leaning towards a prefabricated house, so it reassures us that a prefab house dries relatively quickly. While we don’t want to prepare for every possible eventuality, I consider water damage far more likely than an airplane crash.
B
BauProjekt14
11 May 2014 09:31
waldorf schrieb:
Usually, these houses are much more resistant to water. The main supporting structure would only be damaged if it remains submerged in water for an extended period. These houses are intentionally installed even in heavy rain conditions, where water runs through the entire building. In the unlikely event that a pipe inside the wall bursts, it would probably need to be replaced. However, this is much less problematic than in a solid construction house.
I don’t think it makes much sense to choose a house based on that criterion. You might as well worry about earthquakes or airplane crashes.

When I look at the wall assemblies from various manufacturers, I notice layers in many walls that would definitely swell and deform if they get wet. Am I mistaken? I find it hard to believe that nothing would swell.
M
Milambar
12 May 2014 03:07
Hello JayBeOh,

We also own a timber frame house, and I can assure you that as long as you don’t completely flood your house inside and out, there shouldn’t be any problems.

Of course, if you plan to build in areas that are constantly flooded during rain, you won’t enjoy the house—neither timber construction nor masonry will help. In that case, I would recommend a houseboat.

Any statements like “wood houses are not weather- or moisture-resistant” are tactics used by masonry construction companies who (understandably) fear losing customers!

Regarding the topic of “dry”...
Our house is so well sealed and insulated that the wet screed took a full 3 days to dry without any construction heaters!
(All we used were two bathroom heaters costing €15 each.)

The same applies to filler, primer, and painting work... the walls inside dry incredibly fast—it’s truly amazing.
B
Bauexperte
12 May 2014 09:15
Hello,
JayBeOh schrieb:

Since we are in the early stages of acquiring/building a new house, we are currently comparing different construction methods. We wondered whether a prefabricated house built with timber frame construction is more vulnerable to water damage or even flooding than a solid masonry house.
Why would it be more vulnerable, assuming you hire a reputable contractor? Water damage causes significant problems with any construction method; even concrete does not remain completely unaffected.

Therefore, your decision should not be fixed solely on this issue.

Regards, Bauexperte