Hello,
is it safe to place the Fritzbox Repeater 6000 in a child's bedroom without concerns?
Or is this questionable in terms of radiation?
On this floor, the child's bedroom is the only room with a LAN cable, so it can only be set up there.
Is the child’s age important when assessing this?
According to Fritz, the radiation is so low that no harmful health effects are expected, but what do you think?
is it safe to place the Fritzbox Repeater 6000 in a child's bedroom without concerns?
Or is this questionable in terms of radiation?
On this floor, the child's bedroom is the only room with a LAN cable, so it can only be set up there.
Is the child’s age important when assessing this?
According to Fritz, the radiation is so low that no harmful health effects are expected, but what do you think?
xMisterDx schrieb:
There he goes again... and he’s not even aware that he’s contradicting himself. Are you addressing me here?
xMisterDx schrieb:
And anyone who thinks a smartphone emits as much radiation as a Wi-Fi access point can try setting up a hotspot with their phone as an experiment. Ridiculous, it usually can’t even get through an interior door. If you mean me here as well: I never said anything about what the phone does when using Wi-Fi. I stated that a phone increases its transmission power in the mobile network when it has “poor reception.” The transmission power in GSM and LTE actually exceeds that of Wi-Fi by a significant margin, depending on the frequency.
H
HeimatBauer20 Jul 2023 10:35That’s why I always find it hilarious when someone claims their house is shielded against radiation (as if that were even possible). They cover the entire house with “chakra-proof” wallpaper and have curtains woven from elf hair and silver threads so “no GPS signals can get in” – well, the phone will just increase its power output, and that’s that. It doesn’t take much power for that little astral stuff.
The Wi-Fi repeater isn’t allowed in the children’s room, but the DECT baby monitor is fine – and the phone is left on the bedside table at night, of course still online, so nothing is missed. Sure, you can do it that way.
The Wi-Fi repeater isn’t allowed in the children’s room, but the DECT baby monitor is fine – and the phone is left on the bedside table at night, of course still online, so nothing is missed. Sure, you can do it that way.
H
HeimatBauer20 Jul 2023 10:47Just to be clear: I am fully aware that rooms can be built to be radiation-proof. I have even worked in one professionally for a while. But that’s not something you achieve with a bit of special wallpaper and some fairy hair curtains from a healer’s shop.
The large number of access points (eight for Wi-Fi plus the Zigbee nodes) is not only for bandwidth purposes but also to ensure that individual devices don’t have to run at full capacity all the time. And yes, GSM over Wi-Fi is mandatory here because the cellular network is simply too weak and already deteriorates significantly on the ground floor; one step down the basement stairs and the signal is completely lost.
The large number of access points (eight for Wi-Fi plus the Zigbee nodes) is not only for bandwidth purposes but also to ensure that individual devices don’t have to run at full capacity all the time. And yes, GSM over Wi-Fi is mandatory here because the cellular network is simply too weak and already deteriorates significantly on the ground floor; one step down the basement stairs and the signal is completely lost.
halmi schrieb:
What do people do in apartment buildings? In cities, the list of available Wi-Fi networks is 2km long. All of them must be saturated with signals. Well, if I look and listen to our neighborhood, your latter statement is far from wrong...
2.4 GHz: endless long list, the network is so dense that I plan to replace devices (and have already done so in some cases) that don’t support 5 GHz Wi-Fi...
5 GHz: 'only' fully occupied, but significantly better (or even only) usability compared to the 2.4 GHz band...
Similar topics