Hello everyone,
I am considering using/acquiring a managed switch for the future home network.
In my opinion, it should meet all necessary requirements: Layer 3, routing, IGMPv3, VLAN without a router...
Does anyone have experience with this device or any other comments?
Best regards
I am considering using/acquiring a managed switch for the future home network.
In my opinion, it should meet all necessary requirements: Layer 3, routing, IGMPv3, VLAN without a router...
Does anyone have experience with this device or any other comments?
Best regards
J
JoachimG.24 Jun 2020 08:36Oversizing only begins at the DNA stage, including the DNA Center, in residential construction!
Tarnari schrieb:
FritzBox=Double NATWhat do you mean by that?
Ben-man schrieb:
What do you mean by that?Try searching for “ubiquiti Fritzbox double NAT” on Google. You will quickly find all the relevant information.
Tarnari schrieb:
Just search on Google for “ubiquiti Fritzbox double NAT.”
You’ll quickly find all the relevant information. I’m a bit confused right now. You mentioned that you don’t want to use Ubiquiti because it involves tinkering. So, what’s wrong with using a Fritzbox as the router and a switch for distribution?
Ben-man schrieb:
I’m a bit stuck right now. You had mentioned that you didn’t want to use Ubiquiti because it involves tinkering. What’s wrong with using a Fritzbox as the router and a switch for distribution? Oh, that was actually just a side note in my explanation of why I’m not really comfortable with Ubiquiti, even though it was initially decided that it should be the choice.
blackm88 schrieb:
Yes, the SG250 is good for home use, but not oversized, depending on what you want to do. I like Cisco’s PoE power (I work daily with the SG350, SG550, Catalyst, or large TORs). Could you tell me a bit more about it? You don’t seem to think the idea is that bad.
Similar topics