T
toxicmolotof14 May 2017 19:36Secured? Hmm: On the right side of the sandbox, each post is fixed with 4 wood screws, 140x8 millimeters (5.5x0.3 inches), directly into the sandbox. So the entire sandbox is supported by the posts.
On the left, the two driven sleeves are each fastened with 2 carriage bolts, 110x10 millimeters (4.3x0.4 inches). We initially decided not to cast concrete.
------------------------------------------
And now for the weekend. In advance: We didn’t complete everything as planned. But what we did manage turned out well. We set the lawn edging stones in mortar, excavated a shallow trench, and laid down the weed control fabric. Gravel will be added there later.
Then I built a staircase, which I think was successful. There’s probably not much to say about the slide.





On the left, the two driven sleeves are each fastened with 2 carriage bolts, 110x10 millimeters (4.3x0.4 inches). We initially decided not to cast concrete.
------------------------------------------
And now for the weekend. In advance: We didn’t complete everything as planned. But what we did manage turned out well. We set the lawn edging stones in mortar, excavated a shallow trench, and laid down the weed control fabric. Gravel will be added there later.
Then I built a staircase, which I think was successful. There’s probably not much to say about the slide.
B
Bieber081514 May 2017 23:11ypg schrieb:
By the way, garden and playhouses are not subject to boundary construction lawsI don’t think so, Tim ;-). Generally, that is not the case. Usually, up to 9 m (30 feet) of boundary construction is allowed. The question is whether the boundary construction visible in the photos already uses up this 9 m (30 feet). In case of doubt, the laws of the respective federal state apply.Just for the record, everything is fine here since there is no plaintiff, no judge.
T
toxicmolotof14 May 2017 23:41Regardless of my playhouse, which I really have no issue with, I recommend this ruling if you are interested, published by attorney Kotz on his website:
Administrative Court Neustadt/Wstr.
Case No.: 4 K 25/08.NW
Judgment dated April 17, 2008
Just search for it on Google. A really interesting and sometimes amusing presentation in a case very similar to our house.
Administrative Court Neustadt/Wstr.
Case No.: 4 K 25/08.NW
Judgment dated April 17, 2008
Just search for it on Google. A really interesting and sometimes amusing presentation in a case very similar to our house.
Bieber0815 schrieb:
I don’t think so, Tim ;-). Generally, that is not the case. Usually, 9 meters (29.5 feet) of boundary development is allowed. The question is whether the boundary structures visible in the photos already use up this 9 meters. In case of doubt, the laws of the respective federal state apply.
Just for the record, everything is fine here since there is no complainant, no judge.Sorry 🙂
Since our building authority does not consider our greenhouse a structural building *hehehe, I assumed incorrectly for this house 😉
You don’t have to equate secondary structures or garden sheds with main buildings :P
Cheers, Yvonne
B
Bieber081515 May 2017 07:41toxicmolotow schrieb:
Administrative Court Neustadt/Wstr. Oh man, the building regulations of Rhineland-Palatinate are tough to digest so early in the morning. For us, it’s regulated quite simply.
[QUOTE=http://www.landesrecht.sachsen-anhalt.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&query=Bauordnung+ST+%C2%A7+6&psml=bssahprod.psml&max=true](9) In the setback areas of a building as well as without own setback areas, even if they are not adjacent to the property boundary or the building, the following are permitted:
1. Garages and buildings without habitable rooms and fireplaces with an average wall height of up to 3 m (10 feet) and a total length per property boundary of 9 m (30 feet),
[/QUOTE]
Similar topics