Hello everyone,
I am currently considering the access system for our new build. I am thinking of a keyless system with PIN entry, fingerprint sensor, or something similar.
Which manufacturers should I look into more closely? What systems are you using?
The system is for access to the front door and the garage door. I would prefer not to carry a key, chip, or anything like that.
Security and burglary protection are, of course, very important. The sectional garage door must be able to be opened and closed remotely by radio from the car.
Thanks and best regards
I am currently considering the access system for our new build. I am thinking of a keyless system with PIN entry, fingerprint sensor, or something similar.
Which manufacturers should I look into more closely? What systems are you using?
The system is for access to the front door and the garage door. I would prefer not to carry a key, chip, or anything like that.
Security and burglary protection are, of course, very important. The sectional garage door must be able to be opened and closed remotely by radio from the car.
Thanks and best regards
For me, only transponder systems would be an option regarding security and tamper resistance. The downside is that the transponder can be lost again...
I’m still working on accepting the injection solution. After all, the small glass transponders can be implanted not only under the cat’s skin. The owner is still refusing^^
I’m still working on accepting the injection solution. After all, the small glass transponders can be implanted not only under the cat’s skin. The owner is still refusing^^
S
Sebastian792 Sep 2016 22:05The transponder can also be manipulated with the right tools – not everyone needs something ultra-secure at the front. Intruders break in where it is easiest and least noticeable.
However, the person first needs to know that the door opens with a transponder and where to find it... Even if they knew, reading these short-range transponders without being noticed is likely very difficult. Especially if, for example, it is implanted under the skin on the wrist.
When opening, you only touch the door handle, as the reader is invisibly integrated within the handle, and voilà, the door opens. However, this requires an independent power supply; otherwise, a power outage would make it inconvenient ^^
Exactly, the prospect of quick success attracts thieves. And if the door doesn’t even have a visible lock, the choice is probably already clear. Visibility and accessibility of the garden should naturally also be taken into account.
For me, it is not primarily about high security—that is just an added benefit. But never having to carry, search for, or forget keys again is definitely very appealing.
When opening, you only touch the door handle, as the reader is invisibly integrated within the handle, and voilà, the door opens. However, this requires an independent power supply; otherwise, a power outage would make it inconvenient ^^
Exactly, the prospect of quick success attracts thieves. And if the door doesn’t even have a visible lock, the choice is probably already clear. Visibility and accessibility of the garden should naturally also be taken into account.
For me, it is not primarily about high security—that is just an added benefit. But never having to carry, search for, or forget keys again is definitely very appealing.
Sebastian79 schrieb:
You can also manipulate the transponder with the right tools – people always think they need something ultra-secure at the front. Burglars break in where it’s easiest and least noticeable.Basically, I agree. You can’t expect absolute security, as it doesn’t exist anyway. Instead, the system compares the transponder or fingerprint with the usual key. I don’t see any major disadvantage in these “new” systems.
But if these systems become truly vulnerable—whether due to a general security flaw, the transponder being deliberately scanned, the fingerprint being copied, etc.—I have a problem with proof. Without signs of forced entry, there is no burglary, and without a burglary, the insurance pays nothing. At least, that’s how it works today.
Additionally, attacks on electronic systems are silent, which makes it much harder for neighbors to detect them.
S
Sebastian793 Sep 2016 08:32Giving a boost – anything else would be disastrous
T
tdiedition3 Sep 2016 08:50Mmh, too bad, this does not meet my expectations.
The setting for the day mode is quite inconvenient.
As someone without prior knowledge, I expected all the bolts to extend, even though for VdS approval it is sufficient that only the top and bottom bolts engage.
My requirements are:
1. Absence mode:
I close the door last in the morning on weekdays, and the door locks completely, with the electronic locking system active via bolt contact. Possibly trigger the locking process with a second turn of the key.
2. Presence mode:
I close the door without the bolts extending (my understanding of day unlocking). This allows quick and easy opening without stressing the entire lock mechanism.
I assume the electric strike is a linear motor that only pulls in one direction (to open) but cannot actively lock? If so, my desired functionality will not be available with GU-SECURY?
The setting for the day mode is quite inconvenient.
As someone without prior knowledge, I expected all the bolts to extend, even though for VdS approval it is sufficient that only the top and bottom bolts engage.
My requirements are:
1. Absence mode:
I close the door last in the morning on weekdays, and the door locks completely, with the electronic locking system active via bolt contact. Possibly trigger the locking process with a second turn of the key.
2. Presence mode:
I close the door without the bolts extending (my understanding of day unlocking). This allows quick and easy opening without stressing the entire lock mechanism.
I assume the electric strike is a linear motor that only pulls in one direction (to open) but cannot actively lock? If so, my desired functionality will not be available with GU-SECURY?
Similar topics