ᐅ Floor plan design for a detached house with approximately 145 square meters
Created on: 6 Jun 2019 10:53
G
goalkeeper
Hello everyone,
We are going to build an end-of-terrace house together with a general contractor and have, of course, already planned the floor plans and thought them through accordingly.
The plot measures 10 x 21m (33 x 69 ft), and as currently planned, the maximum available space has been used up, leaving us with enough room for the garden.
On the ground floor, the staircase will be closed off at the bottom and then used as additional storage for drinks or cleaning supplies. The utility connections will also be located in the cloakroom—my wife wanted a separate room so that shoes and jackets don’t always clutter the hallway.
From November, we will be four people, so we have decided to live together on one floor (the upper floor) with our two very small children, as it is simply more practical. A requirement for our master bedroom was the possibility to place a wardrobe 3m (10 ft) wide. However, we are still not completely satisfied with the layout of the upper floor, although we cannot think of any alternatives. The bathroom should stay the same size.
The attic will include a guest room, which will mainly serve as a playroom for the children and me. A large dormer will be added there. Later, one of the older children could move up there, and the two children's bedrooms on the upper floor would be combined into one large room. We both need a home office, so it is designed somewhat larger.
We intentionally moved the technical equipment to the attic because we are building without a basement, which would have meant placing it on the ground floor. That would have significantly reduced the available space there. We will also use this area for the washing machine and dryer, as well as an additional storage room.
Additionally, we will have a converted loft with a height of 1.36m (4 ft 6 in) as extra storage space.
I look forward to your suggestions.





We are going to build an end-of-terrace house together with a general contractor and have, of course, already planned the floor plans and thought them through accordingly.
The plot measures 10 x 21m (33 x 69 ft), and as currently planned, the maximum available space has been used up, leaving us with enough room for the garden.
On the ground floor, the staircase will be closed off at the bottom and then used as additional storage for drinks or cleaning supplies. The utility connections will also be located in the cloakroom—my wife wanted a separate room so that shoes and jackets don’t always clutter the hallway.
From November, we will be four people, so we have decided to live together on one floor (the upper floor) with our two very small children, as it is simply more practical. A requirement for our master bedroom was the possibility to place a wardrobe 3m (10 ft) wide. However, we are still not completely satisfied with the layout of the upper floor, although we cannot think of any alternatives. The bathroom should stay the same size.
The attic will include a guest room, which will mainly serve as a playroom for the children and me. A large dormer will be added there. Later, one of the older children could move up there, and the two children's bedrooms on the upper floor would be combined into one large room. We both need a home office, so it is designed somewhat larger.
We intentionally moved the technical equipment to the attic because we are building without a basement, which would have meant placing it on the ground floor. That would have significantly reduced the available space there. We will also use this area for the washing machine and dryer, as well as an additional storage room.
Additionally, we will have a converted loft with a height of 1.36m (4 ft 6 in) as extra storage space.
I look forward to your suggestions.
Scout schrieb:
And everyone else should just buy one too, starting at around 40,000 (for a small car) if they want or have to go into the city because there’s no alternative, or what?
But we’re getting off topic... Sorry, I would like to end this irrelevant side discussion that doesn’t belong to the topic. I’m no prophet, and I don’t think the original poster cares about this either.
Scout schrieb:
I also agree – by the way, you were the one who started the teasing with your own post (not just a side comment) in #147.You don’t have to jump on every bandwagon – this was about the car, nothing more or less. Even if two parking spaces must be provided, it would be better if only one needs to be used. And the future will surely bring some solutions to this issue, no doubt. And that can be stated without judgment!
G
goalkeeper2 Jul 2019 14:41ypg schrieb:
There appears to be a service track between the properties at the back. A gate could be installed there.Between the properties at the top, there is an access road that allows everyone to reach their garden.
goalkeeper schrieb:
Both of your reactions are completely unnecessary and childish The ladies are absolutely right and just beat me to it.
kaho674 schrieb:
But once electric cars are finally affordable, that’s the next thing I’m buying. Well, hopefully they won’t become that. Otto Pohl / feels comfortable / at the North Pole / without nuclear power.
ypg schrieb:
Well, in 10 years you’ll have to apply for a permit to have a second car anyway. Or vice versa, like in Japan: exemption from providing a parking space for Smart, Aygo, and other compact cars.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
11ant schrieb:
Well, hopefully they won’t do that. Otto Pohl / feels comfortable / at the North Pole / without nuclear power.
Why nuclear power? The plan is wind and solar – especially solar, isn’t it?Similar topics