ᐅ Interpreting the zoning plan / Is it even feasible to implement?

Created on: 11 Apr 2022 21:56
E
Eden1812
According to the development plan, a house with 1.5 floors, a gable roof with a pitch of 24-27 degrees, and no knee wall is permitted. We are wondering how this is supposed to work. Does anyone have experience with this and a solution to offer? We actually want to build a prefabricated house, not an architect-designed house (due to cost certainty).
E
Eden1812
13 Apr 2022 13:33
11ant schrieb:

I believed I had already clarified this misunderstanding: especially when a zoning plan appears clearly odd, secondary sources become crucial (the justification of the zoning plan or its amendments; sometimes even zoning plans of previously developed areas within the same municipality). This allows you to assess whether it would make sense (or if it would be a cynical piece of advice leading the questioner into a trap) to pursue an exemption from the restrictive regulation.

We do not have any further information at this time.
gutentag13 Apr 2022 13:40
Eden1812 schrieb:

We have not received any further information so far.

That doesn’t mean the information doesn’t exist. Perhaps you don’t have the means to search professionally.

Is the seller only providing the brief text section?
gutentag13 Apr 2022 13:46
The standard text from the development plan looks quite outdated. By now, there should be several buildings constructed. How was this handled?
E
Eden1812
13 Apr 2022 13:48
gutentag schrieb:

That doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Maybe you don’t have the means to search professionally.

The seller provided only the brief text section?

The real estate agent only provided these documents.
And since we don’t want to buy a plot—possibly overpriced—whose buildability would involve huge costs due to the zoning plan and site conditions, I wrote here in the forum. BUT it all worked out perfectly, as you can see.
11ant13 Apr 2022 13:52
Eden1812 schrieb:

So far, we have no further information.
But there is: "Partial Amendment VI from November 5, 1988" indicates that there are at least seven justifications (the original plan and six amendments) and that the valid amendment is already 33 years old. Without the withheld information (not to be confused with it doesn’t exist), it would now be possible (or would have been, but I’m not willing to deal with it anymore) to 1. read the justifications and investigate the unusual regulations; 2. compare the justification of the original plan and the amendments to identify where restrictions have been tightened or relaxed; 3. check how later zoning plans from the same municipality have developed; and 4. find out if a seventh amendment is already in progress (and what direction it is taking). Well.
Eden1812 schrieb:

The agent only provided these documents.
Oh, a real estate agent… where did I miss that?
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
E
Eden1812
13 Apr 2022 13:53
And since plots of land are selling like hotcakes, often at inflated prices, there is hardly any time to properly prepare for the project or to obtain the necessary information to avoid falling into a cost trap (because the buildability might be difficult and the zoning plan could be very restrictive). As mentioned at the beginning, the budget for both the land and the house is not unlimited. And it is impossible to reach anyone at the local building authority. Time is running out, and the plot will likely be gone by then.