ᐅ Floor Plan Design for a Single-Family Home (140 sqm Urban Villa) on a Slope with a Double Garage

Created on: 13 Jul 2018 11:06
F
Franky73
Hello everyone,

Two months ago, we purchased a serviced building plot on a hillside and are currently deeply involved in the floor plan design, which is proving quite challenging due to the elevation difference.

I have been following the forum for a while and recently found a great template for our project that I think just needs some adjustments to fit our requirements. I would really appreciate your feedback and am, of course, open to criticism!

Development Plan / Restrictions
  • Plot size: 722sqm (7,770 sqft)
  • Slope: Yes (southwest)
  • Site coverage ratio: 0.3
  • Floor area ratio: 0.8
  • Building window, building line and boundary: -
  • Edge development: No (only carport)
  • Number of parking spaces: 1-2 (in front of the garage and next to the house)
  • Number of storeys: 1.5
  • Roof style: No restrictions
  • Architectural style: No restrictions
  • Orientation: No restrictions
  • Maximum heights / limits: 3m (10 ft) distance to neighbor

Owner’s Requirements
  • Style, roof type, building type: Urban villa, hipped roof
  • Basement, storeys: No basement, 1.5 storeys
  • Number of occupants: 4 (ages: 44, 45, 16, 6 years)
  • Space requirements on ground and upper floor: Upstairs minimum bedroom 11sqm (118 sqft), walk-in closet 8sqm (86 sqft), 2 children’s rooms 12sqm (129 sqft) each, bathroom 13sqm (140 sqft)
  • Office: Family use or home office?: Not needed
  • Guest overnight stays per year: Rare
  • Open or closed architecture: Open downstairs, rather closed upstairs
  • Conservative or modern design: Modern
  • Open kitchen, kitchen island: Open kitchen with island
  • Number of dining seats: Minimum 6, possibility for a large dining table (big family)
  • Fireplace: No
  • Music / stereo wall: No
  • Balcony, roof terrace: If possible, a partially covered terrace
  • Garage, carport: Preferably a double garage
  • Utility garden, greenhouse: Yes
  • Other: Storage space necessary, as no basement

House Design
  • Who designed the plan: Currently from the forum
  • What do you like most? Why? Great layout on the ground floor, still open upstairs
  • What do you not like? Why?: The upper floor layout still fits 3 children, which we don’t need
  • Estimated price by architect/planner: We thought, excluding land, max $250,000 - realistic?
  • Personal price limit for house, including fittings: €250,000
  • Preferred heating system: We are open!

If you have to give up something, which details or features
  • You can give up: Walk-in closet, double garage
  • You cannot give up: Large bathroom

Why does the design look the way it does?
We really like the design here by "kaho674." It truly reflects our ideas. The upper floor should still fit now but, of course, with our minimum required room sizes and the requirement to build only 1.5 storeys.

What is really important to us, especially since the plot is on a slope — the highest point at the street is just under 1m (3.3 ft) above the zero level and it drops 5.11m (16.8 ft) to the lowest point — is how everything can be integrated into the plot without the costs for filling and leveling running out of control. We have also considered an alternative to the urban villa in the style of a split-level house. What have your experiences been building on such a plot?

Many thanks

Floor plan of a house with kitchen, dining area, hallway, cloakroom, shower, utility room, garage and shed.


Floor plan of a multi-room residential house: bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom, hallway and staircase.


Plot plan with house, garage, boundary lines and south orientation.
kaho67416 Jul 2018 20:57
11ant schrieb:
..., and then go to several providers.
Just don’t sign anything, please.
kaho67416 Jul 2018 21:00
Franky73 schrieb:


Yes, I was already thinking about Katja’s rough draft as well, because as I said, we really like it!

Hmm, thanks for the compliments, but I’m afraid this won’t work as a single-story. If I understood correctly, we need one-third of the upper floor area to be below 2.20m (7.2 ft) in height. You usually achieve that with designs that are less square.
11ant16 Jul 2018 21:05
kaho674 schrieb:
but I’m afraid it won’t work as a single-story.

That is already a good test to see if the providers notice that.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
F
Franky73
16 Jul 2018 21:19
kaho674 schrieb:
Hmm, thanks for the compliments, but I’m afraid it won’t work as a single-story. We need one-third of the area on the upper floor to be under 2.20m (7.2 ft) in height, if I understand correctly. That’s usually achieved with designs that are less boxy.

Yes, I hesitate to ask, but maybe you have an idea about this?
F
Franky73
16 Jul 2018 21:21
kaho674 schrieb:
Hmm, thanks for the compliment, but I’m afraid this won’t work as a single-story. If I understand correctly, we need one-third of the upper floor area to be under 2.20m (7 ft 3 in) in height. That’s more achievable with designs that aren’t so square.

Or what do you think about the ideas mentioned to use a kind of basement level so that you go down a small staircase from the actual ground floor? Something like a split-level house.
kaho67416 Jul 2018 21:27
Franky73 schrieb:
Yeah, I’m hesitant to even ask, but maybe you have an idea?

Your architect can struggle with that. They also have much better software for it.
Franky73 schrieb:
Or what do you think about the suggested ideas of using a kind of basement level, so you go down a small staircase from the main ground floor? Something like a split-level house.

Personally, I don’t like split-level homes – having to deal with stairs all the time would annoy me in the long run.