ᐅ Single-family house, 1.5 stories, 155 sqm

Created on: 4 Jan 2025 15:20
M
Mone_04
Hello everyone,
we would like to share our design with you to get feedback and suggestions for improvements, as well as to identify any potential issues.
With the optimized design, we plan to approach construction companies for quotes. All the architects we contacted have long waiting times, and since we need to apply for funding in spring, that would not be feasible timing-wise.

What do we want to build?
A single-family house with a maximum of 160 m² (approximately 1720 sq ft) according to the living space regulations (with the terrace counted proportionally) in order to qualify for funding.

Development plan / restrictions
Plot size: 645 m² (approximately 0.16 acres)
Slope: yes, slight. The plot is about 28 m (92 feet) long and rises about 1.5 – 2 m (5 – 6.5 feet) from the street (south) upwards.
Site coverage ratio: 0.4
Floor area ratio: 0.8
Building envelope, building line and boundary: The building boundary is 2.5 m (8 feet) from the front and rear (as viewed from the street). Roof overhangs may project up to 1 m (3 feet) beyond the building boundaries, provided the setback requirements of the state building code BW are met. Garages may be built outside the buildable areas.
Border development: Neighbor’s garage to the west on the boundary, see site plan. Both neighbors east and west have already built. On the opposite street side (south) is still a free building plot. North is a field with no planned development.
Number of parking spaces: 2, preferably a double garage.
Number of floors: 2 possible.
Roof shape: free choice.
Style: free choice.
Orientation: southwest (SW).
Maximum height limits: maximum height of 8.5 m (28 feet) measured from the ground floor level to the highest point of the roof structure (for roofs up to 7°, only 7.5 m / 25 feet height allowed).
Other requirements: ground floor height max. 0.5 m (1.6 feet) above street level; mandatory photovoltaic system (BW), mandatory cistern (~6 m³ (1580 gallons)).

Client requirements
Style, roof shape, building type: classic gable roof house, 30° roof pitch, 1.4 m (4.6 feet) knee wall.
Basement, floors: no basement, 1.5 floors.
Number of occupants, age: 3 persons, ages 32, 28, 0.
Space requirements on ground floor (GF) and upper floor (UF):
GF: living-dining-kitchen approx. 45 m² (484 sq ft), office/guest room approx. 10 m² (108 sq ft), utility/technical room approx. 8-10 m² (86-108 sq ft), shower bathroom approx. 4 m² (43 sq ft).
UF (all net floor area): bedroom approx. 14 m² (151 sq ft), bathroom with laundry room approx. 16 m² (172 sq ft), 2 children’s rooms approx. 16 m² (172 sq ft) each.
Office: family use or home office?
Since we currently plan for only one child, the office on the GF should serve as storage and guest room; the second "children’s room" will be used as an office. Approximately 15 guests per year; home office about 3 days per week.
Open or closed architecture: open.
Conservative or modern style: more or less modern.
Open kitchen, kitchen island: yes.
Number of dining seats: normally 4, extendable up to 12.
Fireplace: no.
Music/stereo wall: no.
Balcony, roof terrace: no.
Garage, carport: yes, preferably double garage at least 6 x 7 m (20 x 23 feet).
Utility garden, greenhouse: no.
Additional wishes / special features / daily routine, including reasons for certain choices or exclusions:
  • The kitchen should not be visible from the sofa (when sitting).
  • The living-dining area with kitchen should be the “heart” of the house.
  • The shower bathroom and stairs (and if possible the guest room) should not be accessible through the dirt zone at the entrance door.
  • Sufficient cloakroom space.
  • Washing machine & dryer in the bathroom on the upper floor, as laundry accumulates there, but separated from the children’s rooms by the hallway.
  • Gable or dormer facing southeast (street side) due to the view.
  • No dormers or more costly architectural features due to cost reasons.
  • Terrace mainly on the southwest side to catch evening sun. It will later be covered with a pergola. A 3 m (10 feet) lift-and-slide door would be ideal.
  • Ground floor ceiling height at least 2.5 m (8.2 feet), upper floor 2.4 m (7.9 feet) is acceptable.


House design
Who designed it: Do-it-Yourself.
What do you like most and why?
  • Spacious living-dining-kitchen area with kitchen not visible from the living room.
  • Light-flooded living spaces.
  • Possibility to later separate the living room with, for example, glass elements.
  • Space available for furniture placement in living room.
  • Modern feel due to open staircase.
  • Staircase accessible from living area (natural access to bathroom or bedroom).
  • Visual axis from entrance to garden through window behind the stairs, without having a view of the entrance door from the rooms.
  • Implementation of basic wishes (number of rooms, orientation, functionality, etc.).
  • Minimal actual hallway area on ground floor.

What do you dislike and why?
  • No separation from upper floor possible.
  • Head clearance to the first landing of the stairs is critical.
  • Overhang in front of left children’s room is wasted space.
  • No window in the shower bathroom on the ground floor.
  • Dirt corridor & relevant rooms are separated.
  • If a second child comes, there is little storage space.
  • With about 155 m² (1668 sq ft), relatively large (and therefore expensive).
  • Exterior appearance, but we have not focused on this as a priority so far.
  • Southwest terrace has a possible sliding door that is too small (currently 1.5 m / 5 feet), so this door is planned 3 m (10 feet) slightly to the south instead.
  • No pantry; we would consider a small cupboard and fridge-freezer in the technical room if space permits.
  • Very long driveway.
  • Unfortunately relatively close to neighbor’s plot on the southwest side.


Cost estimate by architect/planner: -
Personal budget limit for the house, including fittings: €520,000 (around US $570,000), excluding landscaping, must be reduced by personal labor.
Preferred heating system: not decided yet, no fossil fuels allowed, likely air-to-water heat pump.

If you had to give up something, on which details or expansions could you do without:
  • Large guest/work/storage room.
  • Shower on ground floor.

What could you not do without:
  • Laundry room on upper floor.
  • Side entrance to the house.
  • Generous living-dining-kitchen area.


Why is the design the way it is?
We approached three construction companies, received some good but too large plans, and some standard plans that did not fit at all. Therefore, we studied floor plans intensively and tried to create a design with as few compromises as possible. Because of our wish for a side entrance and the living-dining-kitchen area arranged as an L-shape on the southwest side of the house and the two children’s rooms facing south without dormers or small gables, we couldn’t find 1.5-story designs from prefab house providers that fit.
After considering many other designs, we ultimately drew this one ourselves, which we basically like best and is just acceptable in size. The bay window for the stairs will probably cause extra costs, but we hope to compensate by omitting a flat roof and extending the roof line.
The ground floor ceiling height is an assumption; the stairs are planned for a floor height of 2.83 m (9.3 feet), with 26 cm (10 inches) tread depth and 18 cm (7 inches) riser height.

In addition to comments and suggestions on the floor plan, we also have the following questions:
  • Is the size of the living area including the stairs structurally feasible without issues?
  • How complicated and expensive would ventilation for the shower bathroom on the ground floor be?
  • Is the head clearance for the staircase sufficient?
  • Are knee wall windows, as planned in the children’s room, worthwhile? We see advantages in improved lighting for a small seating area and ventilation possibilities via a tilt window.

Thank you very much in advance for your help! I will gladly provide any information available if needed.
Please be kind, this is my first post and
Grundriss eines Hauses mit Wohn-Ess-Koch, Diele, Duschbad, Technik, Gäste-Arbeit/Abstell, Garage.

Grundriss eines Apartments mit Schlafzimmer, Bad, Diele, HWR und zwei Zimmern.

Ansicht eines modernen Hauses mit dunklem Ziegeldach, heller Fassade, zentrale Tür und Fenster.

Luftbild eines Baugrundstücks mit schwarzer Gebäudeskiz auf weißem Plan neben Wohnhäusern.

Modernes zweistöckiges Einfamilienhaus mit schwarzem Dach, Terrasse unter Pergola und Garten.

Grundriss eines Hauses: Wohnzimmer, Küche, Essbereich, Diele, Bad, Arbeitszimmer, Garage.

Grundriss eines Hauses: Schlafzimmer, zwei Kinderzimmer, Bad, Diele und HWR

Grundstücks-Lageplan: Großes Haus zentral, links Nebengebäude, rechts Anbau, Zufahrt unten.
roteweste15 Jan 2025 07:11
I am not sure whether the quote in the linked post referred only to urban villas (with hip roofs) or if the height is generally an issue.
Y
ypg
15 Jan 2025 07:14
roteweste schrieb:

I am not sure about the quote in the linked post whether it referred only to city villas (with hip roofs) or if height is generally an issue.

You have the 6-meter (20 feet) wall height in both cases.
roteweste15 Jan 2025 07:25
ypg schrieb:

You have the 6-meter (20 feet) wall in both cases

That’s true, of course. In my opinion, with a gable roof, larger eaves can be realized in a visually appealing way if the original poster wants a cozier look.

I have come to believe that the house design should adapt to the requirements of the house. I used to think differently and dreamed of an urban villa with a hip roof.
K
kbt09
15 Jan 2025 07:30
For a two-full-story building, the roof pitch can be significantly reduced along with the overall height, provided this is allowed by the building plan.
K a t j a15 Jan 2025 07:37
roteweste schrieb:

I now believe that the shape of the house must adapt to the requirements of the house.
Well, maybe a bit of both. I think it’s perfectly fine to dream of a gable roof with a low knee wall. But you shouldn’t be surprised if you don’t automatically have a panoramic view on the eaves side. Then you have to put extra money into dormers or additional gables. Or you turn the building around, and the problem shifts to another area. Then you end up spending more money there. The takeaway is that the wish list for 155m² (1,670 sq ft) gets very long. At some point, you have to accept limits either by increasing the budget and floor area or by reducing your wishes.
M
Mone_04
15 Jan 2025 07:59
11ant schrieb:

Show me.
I’ll do that later.

Some general thoughts on the topic of two full floors first:
In my opinion, we need quite a large area on the ground floor to accommodate everything. If we go for two full stories, we’ll have to reduce the size downstairs to keep the total square footage within the funding limit (max. 160 m² (1,722 sq ft) including proportional terrace) and within our budget. But then we’ll have problems with the ground floor.
K a t j a schrieb:

I always find a triple-gable house very pretty as well.
That really is very attractive and would definitely be an option over a full two-story pitched roof. I’ll take a closer look at it later.
11ant schrieb:

A bug as a feature? – It’s at least rare for someone here to specifically want less standing height in the bedrooms.
I only see advantages in terms of arranging the wardrobes. Otherwise, I actually like sloped ceilings in the bedroom. Currently, we only have 1 m (3 ft 3 in) – which I find too little. I think 1.4 m (4 ft 7 in) is great. But of course, everyone has their own preferences and views. Thanks for the links, I just don’t find those pitched roof houses very attractive. The proportions don’t work for me.
roteweste schrieb:

With a pitched roof, larger eaves can be nicely achieved visually, in my opinion, if the original poster wants a cozier look because of it.
I’ll create that in my software; I’ve never consciously seen that in real life.
roteweste schrieb:

I’ve come to believe that the house shape has to adapt to the requirements of the house. I used to think differently and dreamt of a townhouse with a hipped roof.
I basically agree with you, but I still want to be happy and like the look of my house at first sight.
kbt09 schrieb:

With a two full-story house, you can also reduce the roof pitch quite a bit and thus the height, as long as the building plan allows it.
Which in my opinion doesn’t improve the look.
Height according to the development plan is
Mone_04 schrieb:

max. height of 8.5 m (27 ft 11 in) measured from the ground floor slab to the highest point of the roof structure (for roofs up to 7° only 7.5 m (24 ft 7 in) height)
K a t j a schrieb:

Then you’ll just need extra money for dormers or additional gables.
That would be a better option for me than two full floors, which also cost money.
K a t j a schrieb:

Or you rotate the box and then it pinches somewhere else.
And that was originally our plan. But unfortunately, there it pinches too... We have to figure out which compromise we find worse.