Zoning plan/restrictions: suitable
Plot size: 432 m² (4650 ft²)
Slope: slight
Floor area ratio: 0.4
Number of parking spaces: 4
Maximum number of floors: 2
Roof type: gable roof
Architectural style: modern
Maximum heights/limits: ridge height 5.50 m (18 ft), eave height 10.0 m (33 ft)
Client requirements
Basement, floors without basement, 2 floors
Number of occupants, ages: 4 (37, 35, 8, 6)
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor: ???
Office: home office & family
Annual number of overnight guests: 10
Open or closed architecture: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen, open kitchen island
Number of dining seats: 4-6
Fireplace: yes
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: double carport with covered entrance area
House design
Designer: self-designed
Preferred heating system: district heating
Why is the design the way it is? In our opinion, this is the best solution
Standard design from the planner? no
Plot size: 432 m² (4650 ft²)
Slope: slight
Floor area ratio: 0.4
Number of parking spaces: 4
Maximum number of floors: 2
Roof type: gable roof
Architectural style: modern
Maximum heights/limits: ridge height 5.50 m (18 ft), eave height 10.0 m (33 ft)
Client requirements
Basement, floors without basement, 2 floors
Number of occupants, ages: 4 (37, 35, 8, 6)
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor: ???
Office: home office & family
Annual number of overnight guests: 10
Open or closed architecture: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen, open kitchen island
Number of dining seats: 4-6
Fireplace: yes
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: double carport with covered entrance area
House design
Designer: self-designed
Preferred heating system: district heating
Why is the design the way it is? In our opinion, this is the best solution
Standard design from the planner? no
11ant schrieb:
A saying that should be framed in gold leaf. What does the architect do professionally?Getting paid for perfect designs that the client already provides.
Alex85 schrieb:
Getting paid for perfect designs that the client already provides. Thanks, that was exactly the typical programmer’s answer, of course. My sincerest apologies, my question should have been grammatically correct: "Which profession has this* architect trained for and is actually practicing?" 🙂
*) for programmers: referring back to the architect who approves the design
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Alex85 schrieb:
Getting paid for perfect designs that the client already provides.Perfect???? [emoji33]
More like labeling poor designs and praising the client so they don't back out. The rubber-stamp person doesn't have to live in it.
Regards, Yvonne
Nordlys schrieb:
So what. Customer happy, architect richer, all good, who cares if Yvonne likes the design. That’s life. KarstenSorry, Karsten, but that doesn’t matter at all. I don’t like many things – that doesn’t mean it’s bad.
The design has to work.
Similar topics