Hello first of all.
I often ask myself the following question:
The cost of a house is often given in €/m² (per square meter), typically between 1000 and 2000 €/m². How does this relate to the height of the knee wall? It is often about 1 m (3.3 ft) high.
I figure that if I add another 1.30 m (4.3 ft) on top of that, the cost per square meter shouldn’t increase that much, since the entire “construction” like floor, ceiling, windows, sockets, heating, etc. remains the same; only the masonry increases by 1.30 m (4.3 ft) all around.
On the other hand, having a 2.30 m (7.5 ft) ceiling height on the first floor would significantly increase usable floor area.
Do you have any figures or arguments on this?
Best regards
I often ask myself the following question:
The cost of a house is often given in €/m² (per square meter), typically between 1000 and 2000 €/m². How does this relate to the height of the knee wall? It is often about 1 m (3.3 ft) high.
I figure that if I add another 1.30 m (4.3 ft) on top of that, the cost per square meter shouldn’t increase that much, since the entire “construction” like floor, ceiling, windows, sockets, heating, etc. remains the same; only the masonry increases by 1.30 m (4.3 ft) all around.
On the other hand, having a 2.30 m (7.5 ft) ceiling height on the first floor would significantly increase usable floor area.
Do you have any figures or arguments on this?
Best regards
D
DerBjoern18 Jul 2013 13:18Lilik schrieb:
Our construction company charged 600€ for each degree less of roof pitch. That sounds intense...
DerBjoern schrieb:
Sounds intense...Yes, I know. That’s why we stayed at 32°C (90°F). A knee wall height of 115cm (45 inches) is sufficient for us.
Best regards
Lilik
Similar topics