ᐅ Fan Speed of Your Helios Controlled Residential Ventilation System
Created on: 16 Sep 2017 14:26
J
jx7Hello everyone,
A question about your Helios controlled ventilation system:
At what speed does your Helios controlled ventilation run, and what is your target airflow rate?
Our target value is 190 m³/h (112 CFM), and the system adjusts to 1950 rpm (supply air, draft) and 1680 rpm (exhaust air).
In two supply rooms, this creates a sound pressure level of 38 dB(A), which we find too loud.
Best regards
jx7
A question about your Helios controlled ventilation system:
At what speed does your Helios controlled ventilation run, and what is your target airflow rate?
Our target value is 190 m³/h (112 CFM), and the system adjusts to 1950 rpm (supply air, draft) and 1680 rpm (exhaust air).
In two supply rooms, this creates a sound pressure level of 38 dB(A), which we find too loud.
Best regards
jx7
During the initial on-site meeting with representatives from the manufacturer Helios, everyone agreed that the system in the basement is unusually loud, louder than Helios systems typically are. This was confirmed by a measurement using a professional sound pressure level meter.
In the original setting (voltage for 190 m³/h (112 CFM) according to the curve from the diagram), the system emits 56 dB_A, and with the new reduced setting, it is still 53 dB_A. The manufacturer’s specification for 200 m³/h (118 CFM) is 41 dB_A, which is 12 dB_A lower than the value measured in the reduced setting. Since an increase of 6 dB_A is perceived by humans as a doubling of loudness, it can be said that the system in the reduced setting is 4 times as loud as indicated in the catalog.
However, it is now being said that this is normal, and the 41 dB_A value is just a laboratory figure, with higher values expected in practice.
I understand that lab values and real-world values can differ, but in my opinion, being 4 times as loud should not be acceptable; to me, it sounds like VW emissions figures.
In the original setting (voltage for 190 m³/h (112 CFM) according to the curve from the diagram), the system emits 56 dB_A, and with the new reduced setting, it is still 53 dB_A. The manufacturer’s specification for 200 m³/h (118 CFM) is 41 dB_A, which is 12 dB_A lower than the value measured in the reduced setting. Since an increase of 6 dB_A is perceived by humans as a doubling of loudness, it can be said that the system in the reduced setting is 4 times as loud as indicated in the catalog.
However, it is now being said that this is normal, and the 41 dB_A value is just a laboratory figure, with higher values expected in practice.
I understand that lab values and real-world values can differ, but in my opinion, being 4 times as loud should not be acceptable; to me, it sounds like VW emissions figures.
Similar topics