ᐅ Improper Installation of Roof Tiles – Your Assessment

Created on: 11 Feb 2020 07:16
W
Wissi
Hello everyone! I would like to hear your opinion on the following issue. As additional information: we live in a newly built house, and we moved in about 5 months ago.

The issue concerns the fastening of our roof tiles (specifically the verge tiles) and storm damage caused by Storm Sabine. Several tiles were damaged or lifted during the storm, especially on the verge side. This side of the roof corresponds to the main impact area or edge.

For the tile that fell to the ground, it can be seen that it was not fastened at its designated pre-drilled hole or indentation. The indentation is intact, so no screw or nail could have been there (see attached image). According to the manufacturer and as far as I have read in the technical guidelines of the DDH, every verge tile must be fastened.

For us, this means that we can no longer assume that our roof is properly laid and secured. This would require a thorough inspection and correction by the manufacturer. Additionally, in our opinion, the manufacturer is now responsible for covering the roofer’s repair costs, whom we hired directly the next morning (yesterday). Naturally, this should be resolved as quickly as possible to prevent further damage. Also, we believe our insurance will not cover this damage if there is suspicion of improperly fastened tiles.

What are your thoughts on this? Are our views reasonable and understandable? We have already reported the problem to the builder and are currently waiting for a response.

Left brown surface with round indentation; right black metal surface with copper bolt.
A
apokolok
11 Feb 2020 13:01
Did the brick manufacturer cover the roof?
I somehow can't imagine that.
Wissi11 Feb 2020 13:08
apokolok schrieb:

Did the brick manufacturer cover the roof?
I somehow can't imagine that.

No, that is not the case either.
A
apokolok
11 Feb 2020 13:10
But why should he compensate you for the damage then? I don’t understand that at all.
Wissi11 Feb 2020 13:12
It should not at all.
Do not confuse the manufacturer (of the bricks) with the house builder. This concerns only the latter.
A
apokolok
11 Feb 2020 13:18
Ah, that’s what you meant.
You only mentioned the 'manufacturer,' which confused me.
Of course, the general contractor / building contractor should take care of that, I completely agree with you.
Wissi11 Feb 2020 13:35
True, that reads really awkwardly; I definitely mixed that up while writing.

To clarify once again: Everything was, of course, directed at the builder.