Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: approximately 250 sqm (2700 sq ft)
Slope: no
Floor area ratio (FAR): 0.3 (already exceeded but approved)
Site occupancy index: 0.7
Building envelope, building line, and boundary defined by existing structures
Edge development: yes
Number of parking spaces: 1-2
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: flat roof possible
Architectural style: defined by existing buildings
Orientation: north/south
Maximum height / limits: unknown
Additional requirements
Homeowners’ Requirements
Style, roof type, building type
Basement, floors: modern, flat roof, single-family house, no basement, 2 floors
Number of occupants, ages: 6, 35, 35, 1, 4, 5, 11
Space needed on ground floor and upper floor: yes
Office: family use or home office?
Overnight guests per year: not necessarily
Open or closed architecture
Conservative or modern design
Open kitchen with cooking island: yes
Number of dining seats: 6-8
Fireplace: yes
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: yes, roof terrace 100 sqm (1076 sq ft)
Garage, carport: no
Utility garden, greenhouse: possibly on the roof terrace
Additional wishes / special features / daily routines, preferably with reasons why certain things should or should not be included
House Design
Who designed the plan:
- Planner from a construction company: no
- Architect: yes
- Do-it-yourself: yes
What do you especially like? Why?
What do you not like? Why?
Price estimate from architect/planner: unknown
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 500,000 €
Preferred heating technology: fiber-optic electric heating in clay panels plus masonry heater
If you have to give up something, which details/extras can you do without:
- Can do without: high-tech features, garden
- Cannot do without:
Why is the design the way it is now? For example:
Standard design from planner?
Which wishes were implemented by the architect?
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What do you consider especially good or bad about it?
Just some constructive ideas and improvements.
Please understand that compromises have to be made here and that some things will not follow strict rules.
The plans should be understood primarily as a study.
Plot size: approximately 250 sqm (2700 sq ft)
Slope: no
Floor area ratio (FAR): 0.3 (already exceeded but approved)
Site occupancy index: 0.7
Building envelope, building line, and boundary defined by existing structures
Edge development: yes
Number of parking spaces: 1-2
Number of floors: 2
Roof type: flat roof possible
Architectural style: defined by existing buildings
Orientation: north/south
Maximum height / limits: unknown
Additional requirements
Homeowners’ Requirements
Style, roof type, building type
Basement, floors: modern, flat roof, single-family house, no basement, 2 floors
Number of occupants, ages: 6, 35, 35, 1, 4, 5, 11
Space needed on ground floor and upper floor: yes
Office: family use or home office?
Overnight guests per year: not necessarily
Open or closed architecture
Conservative or modern design
Open kitchen with cooking island: yes
Number of dining seats: 6-8
Fireplace: yes
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: yes, roof terrace 100 sqm (1076 sq ft)
Garage, carport: no
Utility garden, greenhouse: possibly on the roof terrace
Additional wishes / special features / daily routines, preferably with reasons why certain things should or should not be included
House Design
Who designed the plan:
- Planner from a construction company: no
- Architect: yes
- Do-it-yourself: yes
What do you especially like? Why?
What do you not like? Why?
Price estimate from architect/planner: unknown
Personal price limit for the house, including equipment: 500,000 €
Preferred heating technology: fiber-optic electric heating in clay panels plus masonry heater
If you have to give up something, which details/extras can you do without:
- Can do without: high-tech features, garden
- Cannot do without:
Why is the design the way it is now? For example:
Standard design from planner?
Which wishes were implemented by the architect?
A mix of many examples from various magazines...
What do you consider especially good or bad about it?
Just some constructive ideas and improvements.
Please understand that compromises have to be made here and that some things will not follow strict rules.
The plans should be understood primarily as a study.
H
hanghaus20233 Dec 2024 09:09HE-DA-Doppelhaushälfte schrieb:
What nonsense, even if you had deleted it, you could restore it.
The plan never existed. What a pity. Then I could have saved my feedback. Taking 5 days in this case is the wrong approach.
I think here you are more to blame yourself. If @ypg says so, you can be sure that they did it.
If someone asks nicely, they might even redraw it once more. But definitely not like this. I wouldn’t do it again either, because only those who pay call the shots.
Why don’t you ask your architect? You are still paying them for this.
Your project is not simple, and you are resistant to advice.
Where is your architect from? In Germany, it is rather uncommon to have the entrance directly into the kitchen.
I often find it a common issue here when someone posts a project or question and then doesn’t respond for days.
If you don’t have time for ongoing and possibly lengthy discussions about your own topic, it’s better to wait to post until you do, since people make an effort to help the person asking. If you truly have no time, then your topic probably isn’t that important to you, although everyone surely can find time if they prioritize accordingly.
When answers come three days later and only address parts of the questions, nothing productive can come of it.
The person asking clearly has a responsibility to engage actively.
If you don’t have time for ongoing and possibly lengthy discussions about your own topic, it’s better to wait to post until you do, since people make an effort to help the person asking. If you truly have no time, then your topic probably isn’t that important to you, although everyone surely can find time if they prioritize accordingly.
When answers come three days later and only address parts of the questions, nothing productive can come of it.
The person asking clearly has a responsibility to engage actively.
HE-DA-Doppelhaushälfte schrieb:
What nonsense, even if you had deleted it, you could restore it. Yvonne is using online software for planning, where the number of projects saved simultaneously is limited. Each project takes up capacity, and every lack of feedback, despite requests, prevents her from treating other patients.
HE-DA-Doppelhaushälfte schrieb:
The plan never existed. What a pity. Then I could have saved myself the feedback. What nonsense, and what an outrage!
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
hanghaus2023 schrieb:
Where is your architect from?Although there was my plan, there was never an architect involved. You can notice that when working with the plans.Similar topics