ᐅ How can you bypass energy-saving regulations and avoid bureaucratic hassle?
Created on: 8 Jul 2017 19:26
F
Farilo
Hello everyone,
Is it possible to build without following the energy saving regulations?
I want to avoid unnecessary insulation and similar measures. At the same time, I want to maintain the great indoor climate that exists in this building from 1959.
Although it was barely insulated, the house remains completely dry and the indoor climate is excellent.
I am planning to build an extension that fits this outstanding indoor climate. All these modern insulation methods are not helpful in this case.
Does anyone have some kind of exemption from the energy saving regulation and can share how they obtained it?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards
Is it possible to build without following the energy saving regulations?
I want to avoid unnecessary insulation and similar measures. At the same time, I want to maintain the great indoor climate that exists in this building from 1959.
Although it was barely insulated, the house remains completely dry and the indoor climate is excellent.
I am planning to build an extension that fits this outstanding indoor climate. All these modern insulation methods are not helpful in this case.
Does anyone have some kind of exemption from the energy saving regulation and can share how they obtained it?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards
ypg schrieb:
Well, I wonder why you want to get to know the people here or why you know them by reading, when maybe you should be studying insulation and such instead. Just trolling. Some Maxximus, whatever. I’m out anyway – nobody’s ever called me snippy before [emoji23]
No, very few people say LOL here, I’ve seen it 2-3 times... it’s a phrase used by people stuck somewhere in the past because of, for example, a loss... usually in a relationship... maybe, but not necessarily. At least there is stagnation in their development... I’d guess from 5 to 10 years ago.
The age back then was in the 20s, others rarely used this abbreviation... I find that quite surprising. After all, it’s a word that older people definitely use as well.
When? Well, for example, following your comment above.
Regarding "stagnation of my development": ypg, please, a bit more decorum and respect. Being funny and being rude aren’t the same. Watch out.
Thank you very much.
Best regards
Farilo schrieb:
Quick question about the "bold text":
I often see images taken with a thermal imaging camera showing an older, uninsulated house. It always appears bright red (meaning warm).
But you say that the walls of old houses are cold.
(Which is actually what I always thought too...).
Where am I making a mistake? The walls in the images only appear red because the rest is deep blue. It only makes sense to use a thermal imaging camera when the outdoor temperatures are low. This way, the temperature differences are easier to see.
Otherwise, due to missing insulation, the wall is naturally cooled from the outside (at low temperatures). As a result, the temperature on the inside surface of the wall is a few degrees colder than the indoor air temperature.
This creates a feeling of coldness near the wall or it may even feel drafty.
In insulated houses, the wall temperature is roughly the same as the air temperature. Because there is no cold feeling, it seems warmer in direct comparison despite the same air temperature.
It simply feels more comfortable.
To compensate for this, the temperatures in uninsulated older buildings are often set higher.
There is also a certain heating behavior involved, but that would go too far here.
You can also notice this with older, large windows. Maybe pay attention to this during winter.
Regards, Joe
S
Steffen8011 Jul 2017 08:26As a multimillionaire, I definitely wouldn’t build a house here or be active in this forum.
Did my post come across as "envy"? Hm... I actually don’t know envy. Maybe I’m wrong and you’re not a troll. Having a lot of money plus a lot of time is certainly possible, no question. I don’t know anyone personally, but if you’re that lucky, then it’s truly something to be admired.
A plot by a lake near Hamburg for 100,000 euros… I’ll only believe that once I’ve seen it. Sorry.
Did my post come across as "envy"? Hm... I actually don’t know envy. Maybe I’m wrong and you’re not a troll. Having a lot of money plus a lot of time is certainly possible, no question. I don’t know anyone personally, but if you’re that lucky, then it’s truly something to be admired.
A plot by a lake near Hamburg for 100,000 euros… I’ll only believe that once I’ve seen it. Sorry.
C
chand198611 Jul 2017 08:49Farilo schrieb:
I often see pictures taken with a thermal camera showing an older, uninsulated house. It always appears bright red (meaning warm). However, you write that the walls of older houses are cold. (Which is actually what I always thought too...).
Where is my thinking wrong?The mistake is this: The red color you see represents heat on the outside. But heat should not be on the outside; it should be inside. The heat visible on the outside means it is missing inside and must be reheated. Well-insulated façades appear as blue as possible in thermal images, blending with the surroundings, because the heat stays inside.
If you look at two people side by side in winter with a thermal camera—one naked, the other wearing a coat—who appears red, who does not, and which one is actually cold? Exactly...
D
dragonfreak11 Jul 2017 09:46chand1986 schrieb:
The misunderstanding is this: The red you see is heat outside. But heat should not be outside; it should be inside. What is outside is missing inside and has to be compensated for. Well-insulated façades appear as blue as possible in thermal images, like the surroundings, because the heat stays inside.
If you look at two people side by side in winter with a thermal camera, one naked and one wearing a coat, who appears red, who doesn’t, and which one is actually cold? Exactly... Since the question about the thermal camera, I’m certain he is a troll.
No one can seriously engage with this topic and fail to see the logical connections xD
I’m out of this thread
Don't feed the troll
Joedreck schrieb:
The walls in the pictures are only red because the rest is deep blue. It only makes sense to turn on the WBK when the outside temperature is cold. This way, the temperature differences are easier to see. Hello Joe,
I’m not quite sure I understand that. The goal is to get a comprehensive overview, not just information from a specific time period. So why only show that one image?
Wouldn’t it make sense, in principle, to also see that there are no temperature differences?
Joedreck schrieb:
Otherwise: due to missing insulation, the wall cools down from the outside (at low temperatures). As a result, the temperature on the inside surface is a few degrees colder than the air temperature.
This creates a "cold feeling" near the wall or it can even feel drafty. Cold outside → uninsulated wall gets cold. That’s understandable.
The inside surface is then colder than the room air temperature, which explains the "cold feeling." Okay.
So this means the uninsulated wall absorbs and releases the ambient temperature. The speed at which this happens is another matter… but so far, so good.
Joedreck schrieb:
In insulated houses, the wall temperature is approximately the same as the air temperature. Because the cold feeling is missing, it feels warmer by direct comparison, even if the air temperature is the same.
So it feels more comfortable. Okay. The inside surface basically remains unaffected by the outside temperature, whether it’s warm or cold outside—completely thermally insulated.
The result is always an inside surface temperature that is roughly constant relative to the indoor air temperature.
By contrast, the uninsulated wall always reflects the current outside temperature. In other words, the wall transmits the outside temperature.
Best regards