ᐅ Timber frame construction: which company is reliable?

Exactly. Stick to the standard. That’s my motto. This way, it stays affordable.
There are many ways to build with wood. Why not? Fjordborg houses look good and offer a good price-performance ratio.

Climbee schrieb:
My experience is completely different. [...] Both offer fixed home types; if you choose one of those and stick to the standard, the price-performance ratio is really good. [...] Custom-designed houses were exorbitantly more expensive. [...] But precisely those "a bit more here, a bit less there" modifications deviate from the standard, and then a price under €300,000 (about $320,000) immediately becomes obsolete.

What I meant is: for a long time, "prefabricated house" also meant "standard model house," and the same applied to many concrete builders (partnerships). A fixed plan and fixed price went hand in hand. That had advantages, not least because of the routine in handling the "critical points" of construction.

Then "custom architectural design" became a popular selling point. That increased the "pressure" to abandon the 62.5 cm (about 25 inches) modular grid, which is now implemented in production facilities everywhere.

A few years ago, there were two further major shifts: the first related to energy-saving regulations. For new wall constructions, all standard plans would have needed to be redesigned anyway. Especially for passive houses, which, structurally speaking, are quite literally heavily insulated conditioned spaces—a significant paradigm shift. Together with the style preferences of a new decade, this often meant that from previous model ranges, not even the former bestseller would remain "unchanged." So: back to square one. Thanks to the higher share of custom planning and faster implementation through CAD, most homebuilders (including the concrete building sector) have now said goodbye to fixed model programs. Instead, many have introduced "building proposals," which are examples of plan-calculation "products," where both sectors also have similar approaches to promotional offers.

The second major shift—roughly at the same time—was market consolidation: with generational changes in ownership families and production processes, there were "market cleanups" and "mergers," similar to what happened in the food, brewery, and bottled water industries. What tends to survive are "brands with a good reputation," behind which the founding family is rarely involved anymore.

Overall, prefab and concrete builders have largely grown closer to each other. Aside from objective or subjective reasons to consider one building method preferable in individual cases, both are increasingly comparable "building contractors." And they will continue to be, as many online platforms provide "matching" providers of both types based on input house size and price range.

To put it bluntly, both basically offer "just" the structural house behind the insulated facade.

They have also become more similar in pricing: previously, prefab house prices increased primarily with the parameter "house size or wall position," whereas prices for concrete houses rose mainly with deviations from the preprinted scope of work. Today, this "assignment" only applies to a limited extent.

---

https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/

In the north, there are still standard home builders who offer very good prices as long as you stick to their plan and only make minor changes inside. The house is sufficiently large, around 110m² (1,184 ft²), well below 200m² (2,153 ft²). Turnkey delivery excludes utility connections and additional groundwork. However, I’m not sure if they operate nationwide. Karsten

Nordlys schrieb:
In the north, they still exist. Standard house builders, [...] I just don’t know if they offer services nationwide.

I believe the combination of “owner personally advises and handshake agreement” with “offering services nationwide” would be a real challenge to achieve.

---

https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/

11ant schrieb:
There is practically no longer a "standard" in the sense of "production homes"—unfortunately—though standard procedures also provide security.

11ant schrieb:
What I meant was: for a long time, "prefabricated house" also meant "production home," and such homes were also common in traditional masonry builder cooperations.

You don’t just sometimes write complete nonsense... later explanations don’t fit at all.
I don’t think you even realize that!

ypg schrieb:
Sometimes you really write complete nonsense... later explanations that don’t fit at all.

“Type house” is a generic term independent of construction methods. It refers to a house design intended to be built for different clients like Müllers / Meiers / Schulzes based on identical plans (although sometimes mirrored or with non-load-bearing walls shifted).

Detailed construction drawings, structural engineering, review calculations, cost estimates: everything is ready and in the drawer. It can be built using wood frame construction, masonry (stone on stone), or concrete blocks – obviously not the same type in different construction methods, but this approach applies across all building methods.

The largest solid construction contractor consortium (general contractors) abandoned this approach more than twenty years ago, the wood panel prefab builders only recently, while concrete panel prefab builders still remain “loyal” to it. It also continues in kit houses. And with developers building entire housing estates composed of standard Type A and B or Type 16 models.

---

https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/