ᐅ Additional cost for plot with a “significant drawback”

Created on: 24 Nov 2020 12:13
S
stoecklj
Hi,

I’m asking on behalf of a friend who, by a lucky coincidence, was allocated a plot of land by the local municipality (application process/point system).

Here is some information:
- Total of 24 plots
- Price: 206€/m² (about 19 USD/ft²) fully serviced
- Allocation decided by the municipal council; evaluation of application forms -> point system -> order of plot selection
- North-facing slope
- Defined building envelope (house + garages including ridge direction / exception for the central section)
- Maximum budget 650,000€ (about 695,000 USD) including the land
- Approximately 150m² (1,615 ft²) of living space planned (not necessarily with a basement)

If there is still a “suitable” plot left during allocation, which one would you choose and what approximate costs would you expect…
Attached are the plots in question.

Thanks for your opinions
Lageplan eines Wohngebiets: Straßenring, Parzellen, Häuser, Grünflächen und RRB-Pool.
Mycraft24 Nov 2020 12:39
Numbers 14-18 would be my favorites, and well, number 24 because of the size, but it also means having the longest street to maintain.
N
nordanney
24 Nov 2020 12:57
Basically, there is no poor-quality product included.

13-18 is actually nice – provided there is no further development to the south. Otherwise, 19-24 is preferred due to the west-facing orientation.
S
stoecklj
24 Nov 2020 12:59
The south and west sides will not be developed in the coming years.
But what costs can be expected... since the slope is quite steep in some areas and the building area is limited, etc...
Y
ypg
24 Nov 2020 13:02
the row on the left or bottom
11ant24 Nov 2020 14:57
stoecklj schrieb:

Thanks for your opinions

Yes, on such limited information I can’t really say much more than share my opinion. My favorites would probably be 16 to 18, 9, or 23. The series from 18 to 23 increases by about two meters (6.6 feet) in height from one plot to the next, so reference heights would be useful—in my view, the most convenient approach is to have a fixed, plot-specific reference point.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
I
icandoit
24 Nov 2020 15:23
19 or 20 because of the lowest slope. Otherwise 18 if not too expensive.