ᐅ Looking for Ideas and Experiences for the Upper Floor

Created on: 16 Feb 2016 23:41
M
Mike12345678901
Hello everyone,

we are currently working on the second floor plan for the upper floor and are struggling to find a good solution.
We have planned an L-shaped house with a gallery. We currently have two versions for the upper floor, but neither fully convinces us. Maybe someone here has a good idea.

Requirements:
  • The staircase and gallery should remain in their current positions.
  • The bathroom can be either at the top (north) or in the middle right (east).
  • A dormer is not planned; roof windows will be added where necessary in the next step.
  • Windows are not shown in the plan but will be placed at the top (north) and bottom (south).
  • The gable roof is open at both top and bottom, so the roof surfaces face east and west.


In Version 1 we like:
  • Sufficiently large children’s rooms
  • Bathroom is acceptable

We don’t like:
  • Master bedroom and walk-in closet are too large
  • Gallery space is reduced

In Version 2 we like:
  • Master bedroom and walk-in closet are well sized
  • Very little wasted space

We don’t like:
  • Layout of the children’s rooms (!!)
  • Bathroom is too large

Do you have any tips, ideas, or suggestions for improvements?
M
Mike12345678901
17 Feb 2016 09:19
ypg schrieb:
First of all: upper floor designs strongly depend on the knee wall height. How is it here, or how is it resolved with the L-shape? Is the knee wall higher on the west side?
Secondly: I generally like the room layout, but I would remove the door between the bedroom and bathroom, move the bedroom door further towards the top of the plan, and remove the wall to the walk-in closet so that you can start with a row of wardrobes right behind the door.
By the way, we have a walk-in closet of about 6 point something square meters (around 65 square feet) with a knee wall of 1.25 meters (4 feet), and it works great for two people. Besides shelves and dressers, there is a stool, a chair, and a floor-to-ceiling mirror. So, don’t generalize too much 🙂

I will clarify this with the building supervisor regarding the knee wall height and have them include it in the plans.

You mean for option 1, right?
Thanks a lot for the input!
🙂
Hessy-James17 Feb 2016 09:58
Option 1 – at the latest when the children notice that the rooms are different, you know why 😉 …in my opinion, this makes more sense.
Nofret22 Feb 2016 12:45
Both designs have oversized supporting columns. This needs to be reconsidered and planned together with the ground floor.
D
daytona
22 Feb 2016 13:19
I prefer option 2 because it has less "dead space" like hallways, etc. But where are the windows???
K
kbt09
22 Feb 2016 14:02
With option 2, there are issues in almost every room. 325 cm (128 inches) room width for a double bed, 177 cm (70 inches) for the closet space, and then the narrow children's bedroom.
M
Mike12345678901
22 Feb 2016 16:52
Thank you for the many responses!
As I said, we don’t like either option. 🙁

The most likely choice would be the children’s rooms from option 1 combined with the master bedroom or upper area from option 2.
325 cm (128 inches) for the double bed is too small, or too large?

Attached is the draft for the ground floor.