ᐅ Control of Multiple Roller Shutters

Created on: 16 Jun 2019 10:34
L
lesmue79
Hello, how can I control multiple roller shutters in one room individually but with as few switches as possible, without having to equip the entire house with a smart home system? My home builder sells Homematic products. But apart from the 3 roller shutters in the living and dining area, which I would like to control centrally yet individually and with as few switches as possible, I don’t really need a smart home system right now.

So, simply put, a switch with 3 buttons/toggles: one for up, one for down, and one to cycle through the roller shutters? This switch would be installed in a central location, with all the roller shutters in that room assigned to it?
G
guckuck2
26 Jun 2019 17:40
nitrox1337 schrieb:

The data he’s providing is ridiculous. Installing KNX just for a few blinds is completely off-topic and a total waste of money.

A colleague retrofitted Wi-Fi based solutions for the blinds in his apartment. Individually, they work, but the group control doesn’t. There are 8 blinds, and when he tried to raise them all at once centrally, it rarely worked for all; usually, 1-2 blinds didn’t execute the command.
He removed it again and replaced it with something operating at 868 MHz, but I’d need to check again.
N
nitrox1337
26 Jun 2019 17:49
Well... if I try to cover 300 square meters (3,229 square feet) with Wi-Fi from a single router without any repeaters, that’s obviously a challenge. But I don’t think many people would do that. Mesh networks are a simple and good solution. Currently, I operate 14 roller shutters over Wi-Fi on three floors and have never had any problems. Of course, you need to ensure comprehensive Wi-Fi coverage, that’s a given. The 2.4 GHz band is especially powerful and stable. The situation is different on 5 GHz, where you need to install more repeaters. But basically, I see no problem for the average user.

Ideally, everything runs on 5 GHz. However, very few people use this frequency because its range is shorter, which naturally increases the need for repeaters and requires basic compatibility of the devices.
T
Tassimat
26 Jun 2019 18:08
With slightly better routers, it is possible to set up multiple networks to separate data-intensive activities like streaming from home automation. In new builds or older homes, streaming, cameras, and similar systems are naturally connected via cables.
G
guckuck2
26 Jun 2019 18:11
Repeaters and mesh networks have no place in new constructions either. However, this seems to be a clash of philosophies.
B
benutzer 1004
26 Jun 2019 19:06
Mycraft schrieb:

(...)
Why anyone would rely on radio signals in a new build is equally beyond me. Assuming, of course, you want an automated house and not a playhouse.

Is it because of cost and/or the developer?
Unfortunately, not everyone designs their own house.
B
boxandroof
26 Jun 2019 20:24
Mycraft schrieb:

I don’t understand why anyone would choose wireless technology in a new build. Assuming, of course, that you want an automated home and not a playhouse.

You are probably referring to the presence of a central bus system to connect a wide variety of devices.

I prefer wired solutions as well. However, in our new build, where we wanted to keep the technology to a minimum, wireless made more sense.

I ordered wireless motors from the window manufacturer, finished. For less money, I received the assurance that the control system would be reasonably flexible (groups, sensors if needed, wind sensors, etc.).

During the construction phase, I didn’t want to deal with the more expensive and potentially less flexible central wiring, a dedicated control system just for shading, or the related electrician work.