ᐅ Which heating option is the most cost-effective?

Created on: 7 Feb 2011 20:22
S
svenmel
S
svenmel
7 Feb 2011 20:22
Hello,

we have a few questions regarding heating systems.
As we are considering purchasing an older house, the question arises about which heating system to choose.
For example, we have a property in mind where there is currently no heating system installed, since it was previously heated with coal (the stove has been removed).
The house currently has 67 sq m (721 sq ft) of living space and has potential for expansion (attic as well as an extension possible) (ground floor and first floor with attic/second floor).
We are leaning towards gas or district heating, but what about installation, connection, and material costs (approximate values)?
What other affordable alternatives are there, such as pellet stoves or similar?
Is there any kind of funding or subsidies available?

Since we don’t have any background knowledge yet, I would appreciate active participation :-)
€uro
8 Feb 2011 13:32
Hello,
svenmel schrieb:
..Since we are considering purchasing a house (older building), the question arises about which heating system to choose.

No one here can reliably answer that question because the basic initial data is simply missing. Especially with existing buildings, it’s easy to make the wrong choice, and it can end up costing a lot.
I can only recommend consulting an independent specialist (building services engineering) because a future-proof overall concept is necessary. Additionally, the applicable energy-saving regulations (energy performance requirements) must be taken into account.
There are plenty of incentives from a primary energy perspective, but they are not always truly economical for the owner. 😉
Some properties can be meaningfully optimized energetically, while others will result in significant extra costs.

Best regards
S
svenmel
8 Feb 2011 20:52
Ok, thanks for the response.

But is it really impossible to say whether gas, pellet system, or district heating will prove to be more advantageous, or which option is the more cost-effective alternative?
€uro
9 Feb 2011 14:47
svenmel schrieb:
...But is it really possible to say whether gas, pellet systems, or district heating will develop more advantageously, or which is the cheaper option?

You would have to be a fortune teller for that. 😉 However, I seriously doubt that this can serve as a reliable basis for a long-term investment decision. I often accompany prospective buyers during property viewings. Unfortunately, the majority are guided by emotional impressions. The bill for heating energy consumption only comes after the purchase! Then questions arise like: "Oh, if only we had known before!"

Best regards.
S
svenmel
10 Feb 2011 17:28
YES, and that’s exactly why it is important for us to gather information in advance.

Yesterday, we looked at a house, but only from the outside (emotionally, we were attracted to it :-) ). Today, I will try to arrange a viewing appointment (there is no heating installed). It is an older house with potential for expansion.
Are there any tips on what we should definitely pay attention to?
L
lbs2
18 Feb 2011 11:53
Of course, everything applies. Mold, construction method, installed windows, whether insulation is present or not, condition of the roof, and so on.