ᐅ How many cubic meters per hour do I need for good indoor air quality?
Created on: 17 Dec 2017 15:45
C
Christian NW
Hello everyone,
I have read a lot about controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery, but I still don’t fully understand the following:
How many cubic meters per hour (m³/h) of supply air are needed to ensure good, continuously fresh air in the various rooms, especially in the bedrooms throughout the entire night?
Here are my rooms with their typical usage and sizes. Maybe you have specific practical experience or calculation values:
Upstairs:
1. Parents’ bedroom (2 persons, 18 m² (194 ft²), 285 cm (9 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
2. Child’s bedroom (1 child, 18 m² (194 ft²), 285 cm (9 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
3. Study room (for 1 person, 10 m² (108 ft²), 285 cm (9 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
Downstairs:
4. Guest room (designed for 2 persons, 11 m² (118 ft²), 255 cm (8 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
5. Living room with an open L-shaped kitchen (ventilation should cover all 4 family members and possibly guests, total 55 m² (592 ft²), 255 cm (8 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
So far, I have read various recommendations ranging from 20 to 30 m³/h per person. But are these values intended for the respective person’s room?
Does that mean, for example, 2 x 30 m³/h = 60 m³/h for the parents’ bedroom?
And 4 x 30 m³/h = 120 m³/h for the living room?
Others calculate based on the room volume, but does this approach sufficiently consider the intensity of use?
What practical values or experiences do you have?
I want to ensure there is always good, fresh air in the bedrooms. The same applies to the children’s rooms as well as the “large” living room with the open kitchen. Especially in the living room, I am unsure what the appropriate air exchange rate in cubic meters per hour should be to adequately serve 4 adult family members plus occasional guests.
I hope you can help shed some light on this ;-)
Thanks in advance!
I have read a lot about controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery, but I still don’t fully understand the following:
How many cubic meters per hour (m³/h) of supply air are needed to ensure good, continuously fresh air in the various rooms, especially in the bedrooms throughout the entire night?
Here are my rooms with their typical usage and sizes. Maybe you have specific practical experience or calculation values:
Upstairs:
1. Parents’ bedroom (2 persons, 18 m² (194 ft²), 285 cm (9 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
2. Child’s bedroom (1 child, 18 m² (194 ft²), 285 cm (9 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
3. Study room (for 1 person, 10 m² (108 ft²), 285 cm (9 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
Downstairs:
4. Guest room (designed for 2 persons, 11 m² (118 ft²), 255 cm (8 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
5. Living room with an open L-shaped kitchen (ventilation should cover all 4 family members and possibly guests, total 55 m² (592 ft²), 255 cm (8 ft 4 in) ceiling height)
So far, I have read various recommendations ranging from 20 to 30 m³/h per person. But are these values intended for the respective person’s room?
Does that mean, for example, 2 x 30 m³/h = 60 m³/h for the parents’ bedroom?
And 4 x 30 m³/h = 120 m³/h for the living room?
Others calculate based on the room volume, but does this approach sufficiently consider the intensity of use?
What practical values or experiences do you have?
I want to ensure there is always good, fresh air in the bedrooms. The same applies to the children’s rooms as well as the “large” living room with the open kitchen. Especially in the living room, I am unsure what the appropriate air exchange rate in cubic meters per hour should be to adequately serve 4 adult family members plus occasional guests.
I hope you can help shed some light on this ;-)
Thanks in advance!
C
Christian NW17 Dec 2017 19:23You have truly succeeded in perfecting my confusion ;-)
But it’s true, I won’t be able to calculate everything myself and will definitely be happy to leave that to the professionals.
Still, I was hoping one of you could at least roughly explain how these two different calculation methods—which produce quite significantly different results—are reconciled in practice.
Let’s stick to this one example:
Guest room (for 2 people, 11 m² (118 ft²) with a room height of 2.55 m (8.4 ft) = 28.05 m³ (991 ft³)):
1. Calculation method using an air exchange rate of 0.3:
8.42 m³/h (297 ft³/h)
2. Calculation method with 25 m³/h (883 ft³/h) per person:
50 m³/h (1766 ft³/h)
The results for air exchange differ enormously; both can’t be correct. But why do both calculation methods exist?
Or have I completely misunderstood something here?
But it’s true, I won’t be able to calculate everything myself and will definitely be happy to leave that to the professionals.
Still, I was hoping one of you could at least roughly explain how these two different calculation methods—which produce quite significantly different results—are reconciled in practice.
Let’s stick to this one example:
Guest room (for 2 people, 11 m² (118 ft²) with a room height of 2.55 m (8.4 ft) = 28.05 m³ (991 ft³)):
1. Calculation method using an air exchange rate of 0.3:
8.42 m³/h (297 ft³/h)
2. Calculation method with 25 m³/h (883 ft³/h) per person:
50 m³/h (1766 ft³/h)
The results for air exchange differ enormously; both can’t be correct. But why do both calculation methods exist?
Or have I completely misunderstood something here?
Christian NW schrieb:
1. Calculation method with an air exchange rate of 0.3:
8.42 m³/h (5.24 cubic feet per hour)
2. Calculation method with 25 m³/h (14.8 cubic feet per hour) per person:
50 m³/h (29.4 cubic feet per hour)
The results regarding air exchange differ significantly; both cannot be correct. But why are there two calculation methods?Do two people actually live permanently in the guest room around the clock?
If yes, that’s understandable; if not, I find 50 m³/h (29.4 cubic feet per hour) in this example exaggerated. Just imagine completely ventilating the room you are in twice per hour.
Alex85 schrieb:
Do two people live permanently around the clock in your guest room? I think you are drawing several conclusions at once here: in my opinion, the original poster is more concerned with the calculation method itself; adding all maximum values together would, of course, be a bit excessive for designing a central system.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
11ant schrieb:
I think you are drawing several conclusions at once: in my opinion, the original poster is more concerned with the calculation principle itself; adding up all the maximum values would obviously be a bit excessive for the design of a central system.But have you read their calculations? They are simply applied incorrectly, see the post by @Lumpi_LE.
It doesn’t make sense to assume a constant occupancy for every room as a design basis and thus massively oversize all the rooms. Hence the question whether the guest room is occupied 24/7.
The first calculation method results in equipment sizing in the entry-level to mid-range category for a 500 m³ (17,650 ft³) building interior volume. The second method, applied as the original poster does, is probably not common in single-family homes.
Alex85 schrieb:
It doesn’t make sense to assume a permanent occupancy in every room and therefore to overdimension all rooms mercilessly. Of course not. Incorrect sizing—whether oversizing or undersizing—is always a major efficiency killer.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/