A complete ban on gas heating starting in 2024 is no longer planned. Instead, homeowners will be allowed to install gas heat pump hybrid systems or other fuel-based central heating systems in the future. Additionally, hardship exemptions and extended deadlines for replacement will be introduced. This is outlined in a concept paper by the federal government.
The previously favored obligation for homeowners will also be relaxed; going forward, both in new construction and existing buildings, only heating systems that use at least 65 percent renewable energy should "preferably" be installed. The coalition agreement had initially planned to introduce this requirement in 2025, but it is now being brought forward by one year to 2024.
The government intends to offer homeowners six options to meet the 65 percent target: heat pumps, biomass, green gas, hybrid systems, electric direct heating, or connection to a district heating network.
The previously favored obligation for homeowners will also be relaxed; going forward, both in new construction and existing buildings, only heating systems that use at least 65 percent renewable energy should "preferably" be installed. The coalition agreement had initially planned to introduce this requirement in 2025, but it is now being brought forward by one year to 2024.
The government intends to offer homeowners six options to meet the 65 percent target: heat pumps, biomass, green gas, hybrid systems, electric direct heating, or connection to a district heating network.
Now you are mixing a few things, but apparently, that is what you want. Sophistry was quite common in the 19th century.
The war, the resulting crisis, and the measures taken in response only partly relate to the fundamental plan, which is mainly about focusing on renewable energy and advancing the expansion of the European-wide grid. By the way, this also concerns internal security (for Europe!)—when EU countries work together, the security of supply improves for the entire community and for each individual country.
However, for people who think only in terms of borders, this seems to be beyond their horizon of understanding.
The war, the resulting crisis, and the measures taken in response only partly relate to the fundamental plan, which is mainly about focusing on renewable energy and advancing the expansion of the European-wide grid. By the way, this also concerns internal security (for Europe!)—when EU countries work together, the security of supply improves for the entire community and for each individual country.
However, for people who think only in terms of borders, this seems to be beyond their horizon of understanding.
D
Deliverer21 Jul 2022 13:18I have already mentioned this before: NONE of this has anything to do with the Greens. Not the war, not climate change, and definitely not the past 30 missed years.
Steven schrieb:
In short, That’s wrong. You quote Steven and just leave it like that.
Steven schrieb:
That’s not my topic. Clearly.
Steven schrieb:
My topic is internal security. Okay, this thread isn’t about internal security, you can leave.
Goodbye.
MayrCh schrieb:
you can go.
Goodbye. Hello MayrCh
Did you rush through childhood on a fast track?
Apparently, that is the style of the Greens. Falsifying resumes, dreaming of hemp cultivation (I have already addressed the demand for sex with toddlers), and otherwise not accepting any other opinions. It is no coincidence that when you search for "ban party / prohibition party," you get plenty of hits related to the Greens.
Try, beyond your ideological bias, to accept other opinions as well.
Energy: we’re not that far apart. We need to move toward climate-friendly energy. There should be no taboos there. But ideological nonsense should be avoided as well.
Environmental protection: here it gets tight.
I have spent over 40 years in Central Africa. It is catastrophic.
The Masai Mara (part of the Serengeti) was reduced by 70 km (43 miles) to the south a few years ago to make room for farmers.
Primary forests are being cleared by fire to satisfy our inflated obsession with vegan soybeans.
The human population is increasing rapidly.
Even if Germany acts in an environmentally friendly way, it won’t help much.
A global plan is needed to limit uncontrolled growth.
Unfortunately, I have no idea what that would look like. But maybe the Greens do.
Steven
Steven schrieb:
A global plan to limit uncontrolled growth is necessary.We agree on that! I also believe no one should be excluded unless they are literally a mass murderer.Steven schrieb:
Speeding through the nursery at express train pace?
Apparently, that’s the style of the Greens.I can’t judge that, I’m not a "Green."