ᐅ If a second full story is not built in the attic, the building depth equals the building width.
Created on: 6 Feb 2022 19:43
M
Melinaaa
Hello everyone,
We are planning a townhouse with a ground floor, first floor (without sloping walls), and an attic.
Does the above text mean that our house must be as wide as it is long?
However, our floor plan measures 9 x 11 meters (30 x 36 feet)... Do you know if there is any flexibility regarding this?
And another question:
We are building in a new residential development and purchasing a serviced plot of land. Are the road construction costs included in this, or will they be charged separately at the end? (This could be a disadvantage for a corner plot.)
Thanks!!
We are planning a townhouse with a ground floor, first floor (without sloping walls), and an attic.
Does the above text mean that our house must be as wide as it is long?
However, our floor plan measures 9 x 11 meters (30 x 36 feet)... Do you know if there is any flexibility regarding this?
And another question:
We are building in a new residential development and purchasing a serviced plot of land. Are the road construction costs included in this, or will they be charged separately at the end? (This could be a disadvantage for a corner plot.)
Thanks!!
M
MM1506zzzz6 Feb 2022 21:46Melinaaa schrieb:
Um, excuse me? The development plan is the written regulation. Since posting links is not allowed in this forum, 11ant has requested to name the development plan itself, for example:
"Construction area Sonnenscheingrund in Hintertupfling"
MM1506zzzz schrieb:
Since posting links is not allowed in this forum, 11ant requested naming the development plan explicitly, for example:
"Residential area Sonnenscheingrund in Hintertupfling"Oh right, thanks, that is the Gosepark in Alfhausen.
However, I had attached the mentioned sentence as an image in my second to last message.
B
Benutzer2006 Feb 2022 22:45Melinaaa schrieb:
By leniency, I meant that you can’t really plan exactly the same length and width down to one meter, Are you suggesting that the regulations in the development plan are just rough guidelines? Like a red traffic light that you can basically run if you don’t bother anyone?
Exactly the same length and width means exactly the same length and width down to the centimeter. What’s the problem with planning it that way? By the way, the text uses the word “mandatory.” That cannot be interpreted as “it would be nice if.”
Benutzer200 schrieb:
Do you actually think the regulations in the development plan are just rough guidelines? Like a red traffic light that you can practically run if you don’t bother anyone?
Exactly the same length and width means precisely the same length and width down to the centimeter. What’s the problem with planning that way? By the way, the text uses the word “mandatory.” You can’t interpret that as “it would be nice if.” I don’t know, that’s why I’m asking, and I don’t think you need to be rude about it.
Melinaaa schrieb:
By flexibility, I meant that you can’t really plan to be exactly one meter (3.3 feet) longer or wider, so maybe there is a meter (3.3 feet) leeway in the length/width?You submit a building permit / planning application that details the house dimensions down to the centimeter (inch).On the other hand: Would you be flexible if your contractor built one side one meter (3.3 feet) smaller?
Tassimat schrieb:
You submit a building permit / planning permission application with the house dimensioned down to the exact centimeter.
On the other hand: would you be lenient if your builder constructed one side one meter (3 feet) shorter?No, of course not, but I could have imagined that the length/width only needs to match within one meter (3 feet), simply because it seems pointless to artificially distort the floor plan just to make all sides exactly the same length.
But now I understand, thanks!