Hello everyone.
I am new here and would like to ask who has built a prefabricated house using a timber frame construction method?
Are you satisfied?
Which company did you choose, and if so, why?
I have been looking into this for some time now and am undecided between two companies.
Thank you in advance
Frau Ungeduld
I am new here and would like to ask who has built a prefabricated house using a timber frame construction method?
Are you satisfied?
Which company did you choose, and if so, why?
I have been looking into this for some time now and am undecided between two companies.
Thank you in advance
Frau Ungeduld
11ant schrieb:
"Standard house" is a construction method–independent term. It refers to a house design intended to be built for multiple clients like Müllers, Meiers, or Schulzes according to identical plans (although sometimes mirrored or with shifted non-load-bearing walls).
Detailed construction drawings, structural engineering, verified static calculations, and cost estimates—all ready and available. The house can be built using timber frame construction, traditional masonry, or insulated concrete forms—of course, not the same exact design in different construction methods, but this approach applies to all methods.
The largest solid construction contractors’ cooperative (master builders) abandoned this concept more than twenty years ago; timber panel prefabricators only a few years ago; and concrete panel prefabricators still remain "loyal" to it. The concept still exists in kit homes and with developers who build entire housing estates with cookie-cutter type A and B, or type 16 houses.Completely missing the point again—I didn’t want your explanations. You really don’t notice, do you?
Nordlys schrieb:
Yvonne, now don’t be so picky.Karsten, I am not picky.
This constant rambling tires not only me. It is increasing in frequency and intensity, and eventually even I will reach my limit and stop overlooking it.
The most commonly built house in Germany is the Flair 113, and if you choose minimal specifications, it is correspondingly inexpensive. The thinnest possible approved slab foundation without waterproof concrete, concrete roof, interior walls made of aerated concrete, prefabricated roof trusses, uncoated windows, cheapest ceramic fixtures and radiators, €20 tiles, no mechanical ventilation system, no shading devices, cheapest roller shutters, only six power outlets in the kitchen, and the lowest-quality exterior plaster that turns green after about ten years... wonderful. The low price does not come from the house model itself, but from the use of cheap materials. And whether the waterproofing and other work is done properly or just done cheaply has already been doubted by more than one person.
ypg schrieb:
Off topic again – I didn’t want your explanations You really don’t notice it That [U]I definitely can’t notice: “explanations coming later don’t fit at all” reads to me more like “you need to provide more explanations until I understand,” not like “I didn’t want your explanations.” Now I get it
Nordlys schrieb:
Mrs. Impatience actually wanted to know whether she should go with Hanse Haus or Haas. And no one has answered that yet... me neither.As soon as Mrs. Impatience comments on the remaining open questions, that can gladly be answered. By the way, World-e has answered that a timber frame house from a local carpentry workshop will be her choice. With reasoning, although much shorter than mine.
Grym schrieb:
The most commonly built house in Germany is the Flair 113... which is neither from Hanse nor Haas
Grym schrieb:
The low price doesn’t come from it being a standard model home,Correct.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/