ᐅ Home Construction Project – Where to Start?

Created on: 4 Feb 2026 09:10
M
mona_johansson
Hello dear homebuilding community,
I’m Mona from Bad Neustadt, and we are just starting our self-build project. Honestly, I still feel a bit overwhelmed by all the options and upcoming decisions.

Where did you find inspiration at the beginning? Show homes / model homes, online galleries, groups like this one – what helped you during the initial phase? Is there a tool where you can collect and organize ideas, pictures, or preferences without having to speak directly with a consultant?

So far, I only have a folder with screenshots and a small list, but it quickly becomes confusing. How do you organize things – do you use mood boards, checklists, or something else entirely? Looking forward to your tips and experiences!
M
MachsSelbst
4 Feb 2026 15:12
I would skip all the hassle, assuming you have a somewhat suitable plot where you can build a house with a slab foundation. There are plenty of companies that build standard floor plans, and after countless rounds in the floor plan forum, many end up more or less with one of these standard layouts… because they simply work. Not just when the kids are small… or grown up… or gone. They work most of the time.

It’s like buying a car. You look at 2, 3, maybe even 10 models and then you buy… usually for a significant amount of money.

I don’t know if I’m an exception to the exception or a total outlier, but when I talk to people in the building area here, that’s actually how it was for most of them. I spent a few days looking at floor plans online, found one I liked. Then we went to the builder (Town & Country), had two meetings, got a price, thought about it for two days, and then signed… no months-long comparison of 4, 5, or 10 offers, no 2, 3, or 5 “dates” per contractor.

My opinion: you just have to catch good companies, that’s always the case. But in the end, it’s just a house—it doesn’t have to be perfect to live in. After 3 or 4 years of “living,” it won’t look as nice as it did on moving day anyway.
Papierturm4 Feb 2026 16:24
This is how we did it. Whether everything was really good or correct is debatable. However, I find some of these ideas quite helpful:

  1. Looked for a plot of land! The plot determines so much that without it, planning is very limited. (Never sign a house construction contract without owning the plot. Some companies offer a "land service," but this often just means referring you to common real estate websites and handing you off to market listings.)
  2. Assessed our needs. Which rooms do we require? What style do we roughly want?
  3. We looked at countless houses and apartments. Not directly for inspiration, but to sharpen our sense of spatial proportions, flow, and everyday suitability. Friends, family, local surroundings, model home parks... the goal here is not to find "the builder" or "the floor plan," but rather to develop a better personal feel for what matters. What would work well in our daily life. And what wouldn’t.
    (I would definitely recommend these three steps without reservation.)
  4. We had a plot fairly early. Then we wandered around a bit, flipping through catalogs and having various conversations with building companies. After three months, we were so frustrated that we hired an architect (for phases 1-4, fixed price. Important: Choose an architect who also offers phases 1-8, otherwise you might end up with someone who designs unrealistic plans). With the architect’s planning and equipment lists, we then approached several building companies and selected one together with the architect.
  5. The first selected general contractor went bankrupt, so we had to go through another selection process. Construction is currently underway (although there is a slight pause due to the weather).


A standard floor plan would theoretically have been possible for us as well. Our floor plan is not particularly special. Window and room arrangements are somewhat unusual due to the specifics of the plot, but that likely could have been adjusted with a general contractor too.
The bigger issue was the development plan (building permit / planning permission). During the “wandering around” phase, not a single building company was able to adapt their “standard house” to fully comply with the development plan. That’s why we ultimately decided to go with an architect.
M
MachsSelbst
4 Feb 2026 16:59
As mentioned, the plot obviously has to allow for it. We didn’t have any special restrictions, and it’s relatively flat... After 15 years in project management, I’ve become quite jaded regarding hopes and expectations. I knew it wouldn’t be perfect anyway, and in the end, you have to tinker a lot yourself... no project without unpleasant surprises...

It’s always a question of how much time you want to invest upfront. Some people waste 2 or 3 years on planning.
On one hand, prices keep rising, and you can’t save against that—the money just loses value. On the other hand, it’s also your lifetime that you could already be enjoying in your home. With kids aged 10 or 12, you don’t really need a garden anymore...

Standard floor plans represent everyday living quite well and are also cost-optimized. First, you have to find an architect who can really improve on that with a custom design. That also takes time and money.

My opinion: don’t waste too much time on planning. Better to accept some compromises and start living in your home... Pareto principle. 80% of the result with 20% of the effort.
11ant4 Feb 2026 17:53
Papierturm schrieb:
After three months of frustration, we hired an architect (for phases 1-4, fixed price. Important: choose an architect who offers phases 1-8, otherwise you might end up with one who only produces empty promises). Then we approached various construction companies with their planning and equipment lists.

You should hire an architect even without desperation and with a low-demand plot. The main thing is twofold: they should be capable of handling both halves of the project, but initially the contract should only cover “Module A.” It’s during the “resting phase” with decision-making that you find out whether you want to continue with the architect, and whether it will proceed just for phase 3 or beyond. And yes, having your own detailed scope of work is always better than comparing apples to oranges until you don’t know where your head is at.
Papierturm schrieb:
A standard floor plan would theoretically have been possible for us as well. Our floor plan isn’t that special. The window and room layout is a bit unusual due to the plot’s characteristics, but that probably could have been adapted by a general contractor too.
The real problem was the local development plan. During the “wandering around,” no (!) construction company managed to adapt their “standard house” to fully comply with the development plan. That’s why we ended up going to an architect.

Does the plan require garden gnomes to wear top hats instead of pointed caps, are the reference heights unclear or devilish, or what exactly is the problem?
MachsSelbst schrieb:
Standard floor plans mostly cover everyday needs well and are cost optimized. You first have to find an architect who truly improves on this with a custom design. That also costs time and money.

Standard floor plans suit average families (2 adults, 2 kids without a second home office, on a flat plot). Otherwise, you have to rethink things (which is difficult for unadvised laypeople). According to my modular approach, that doesn’t cost time, and if used properly, the architect fully justifies their fees.
MachsSelbst schrieb:
Don’t waste too much time on planning, better to just accept some imperfections and move in... Pareto principle.

For an intermediate house (or “the first house for an enemy”), anything more would be too much.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Y
ypg
10 Feb 2026 15:23
Quick question for you: Have you started yet?