ᐅ Intel/Windows applications – NUC, mini PC, or server. What do you recommend?

Created on: 7 May 2021 11:15
H
HarvSpec
Hi everyone,

I’m currently considering the idea of a central computer.
The computer should run the following applications so that I can remote access them from my Mac (M1 & Intel):

- ETS Professional
- Gira Project Assistant
- Unifi Controller
- Possibly VirtualBox to experiment with Home Assistant

In other words, I want to have all the programs that don’t run natively on Macs or require an Intel chipset (or both, I’m not sure which work on Windows for ARM) on a central computer that I can access remotely.

Since none of these are “classic” server applications, I was thinking of using a mini PC or NUC with Windows 10 running 24/7 in a 19" rack.
Does it make sense to switch to server hardware designed for 24/7 operation, like a DELL PowerEdge or similar? Those usually run only server versions of Windows, and the rest feels like a workaround again.

Regards,
Harv
Tarnari7 May 2021 21:58
I would argue that any solid hardware can be used without problems. I am an experienced gamer, hardware, and overclocking enthusiast and always choose my components based on price/performance/noise/tuning.

A few years ago, I completely replaced my computers at that time. An i5 3570k on an Asrock Z77 Extreme 4 motherboard, powered by a Bequiet Dark Pro 10.

This setup has now been running as a server for 5 years. I have locked the CPU clock to the minimum, reduced the voltage accordingly, and done the same with the RAM. The server has two SSDs and three HDDs connected. The HDDs serve as data storage.

The system runs Windows Server 2016. Applications include Active Directory, file server, media server, Windows Deployment, the Unifi Controller, PRTG Network Monitor, and VMware for experimenting.

It runs continuously, 24/7/365, consuming about 40 watts.

Of course, a NUC uses significantly less power, but you first have to invest in the purchase cost.
rick20187 May 2021 22:04
The applications you mentioned do not require much power. If you don’t have a NAS yet and are considering getting one, you could run a VM on it. That’s how I do it for a few things, for example.
H
HarvSpec
8 May 2021 09:24
I have an HP 800 G2 Thin Client here with an i5 processor, 8 GB RAM, and a 256 GB SSD.
For now, I think I’ll use it first and then revisit the topic of the NAS and virtual machine later, as that seems more practical.
untergasse438 May 2021 10:56
I’m using two Dell R210 II units... one as a pfSense router and the other as a server for everything. Quiet, energy-efficient, 1 U in the rack. Runs great with Proxmox.
H
HarvSpec
14 May 2021 14:01
Brief feedback:
I now have the HP Mini PC running in the rack and can easily access ETS remotely from all Macs, just as I wanted.

I’m only annoyed that I struggled with Bootcamp for the past few months and didn’t think of this solution earlier...
M
Markus254
14 May 2021 19:12
You don’t need any extra server hardware for that. As long as you have a proper backup, I don’t see any issues.
Most likely, the hard drive will fail first; everything else should run fine for years.

Running Home Assistant via VirtualBox is tricky. It’s fine as long as you don’t need to pass through USB sticks or similar devices.

An Intel NUC (possibly used) with Windows installed would work. I’m not sure if Gira Project Assistant and ETS Professional are available for Unix systems!?