Hello dear forum,
We are building a prefabricated house with a ventilation system. Today we had our blower door test, and the result was n50=1.13. The site manager said this is within the standard (max. 1.5). Regarding the conditions:
The building envelope is in place, but the skirt is still missing—that is, the material that is attached to the base slab.
What do you think about this value? As the homeowner, do I have the option to request an improvement in the result?
Thanks and best regards
We are building a prefabricated house with a ventilation system. Today we had our blower door test, and the result was n50=1.13. The site manager said this is within the standard (max. 1.5). Regarding the conditions:
The building envelope is in place, but the skirt is still missing—that is, the material that is attached to the base slab.
What do you think about this value? As the homeowner, do I have the option to request an improvement in the result?
Thanks and best regards
S
Silent8022 Feb 2019 06:26So initially, they tested everything using negative pressure. The value was around 1.4 or so. Then they spent about 2-3 hours checking everything, sealing everywhere, and filling some gaps with foam insulation to make it airtight.
In fact, they went through each room twice and tested every gap and joint.
Still, quite a few things are missing.
- The skirting board at the floor was bulging, meaning it had holes.
- The window sills are missing.
- The house apron (the protective external base trim) is missing.
- The chimney was taped off but not completely; it will be covered with OSB panels on Monday.
- And so on.
I’m not sure. Can I still insist on a further defect search? How would you proceed? I’m here to get some advice.
In fact, they went through each room twice and tested every gap and joint.
Still, quite a few things are missing.
- The skirting board at the floor was bulging, meaning it had holes.
- The window sills are missing.
- The house apron (the protective external base trim) is missing.
- The chimney was taped off but not completely; it will be covered with OSB panels on Monday.
- And so on.
I’m not sure. Can I still insist on a further defect search? How would you proceed? I’m here to get some advice.
What you’re saying doesn’t make sense... The airtightness value isn’t meant to just fall below some theoretical limit so you can get money from the KfW; it mainly shows where air leaks into your house, which costs you energy... So the value should be as good as possible.
To keep the comparison with the high school diploma: I have a 4.0 GPA, but that doesn’t mean I can do math...
So now you have some clues about what the problem might be, and these need to be fixed, which your general contractor seems to be trying to do.
To keep the comparison with the high school diploma: I have a 4.0 GPA, but that doesn’t mean I can do math...
So now you have some clues about what the problem might be, and these need to be fixed, which your general contractor seems to be trying to do.
Oh wow... we had the test yesterday.
KfW55 construction method.
Our value was 1.4!
According to TÜV, the cause is the electrical outlet inserts, the base is not yet glued with perimeter insulation, and the front door did not close properly due to a missing lock (power was off).
But 4 minus! Passed is passed.
The defects will be fixed later.
KfW55 construction method.
Our value was 1.4!
According to TÜV, the cause is the electrical outlet inserts, the base is not yet glued with perimeter insulation, and the front door did not close properly due to a missing lock (power was off).
But 4 minus! Passed is passed.
The defects will be fixed later.
Similar topics