Are the measurement results from a private land survey always submitted to the land registry office by the surveyor?
After our surveyor confirmed the boundary markers, we received an invoice from the land registry office for registration. This confused us a bit because the measurement data matched the boundary markers exactly. Why does this information still need to be sent to the land registry office?
After our surveyor confirmed the boundary markers, we received an invoice from the land registry office for registration. This confused us a bit because the measurement data matched the boundary markers exactly. Why does this information still need to be sent to the land registry office?
H
HilfeHilfe17 Mar 2016 06:55to compare these..............
It might be a bit nitpicky of me, but linguistically, "to align" means to adjust, level, fine-tune, coordinate, control, or regulate. However, none of this needed to happen, at most maybe a comparison – to check whether the old and new data match. But this has already been done by the surveyor, so why is the land registry office being involved?
B
Bauexperte17 Mar 2016 12:03ratlos00 schrieb:
It might be a bit nitpicky of me ... Naive.
You were not exactly sparing with links in your response, which means you can handle your browser. With a bit of research, you would have come across "Ganz schön vermessen," the information page of the cadastral offices. There you could have read the following sentences:
"The cadastre is maintained by the responsible cadastral or surveying office and serves as the basis for the land register." Also "The cadastre represents the official register within the meaning of § 2 para. 2 of the Land Register Code (Grundbuchordnung, GBO). It thus guarantees property rights."
as well as
"Maintenance means that the cadastre is subject to continuous updating. Usually, this updating is carried out by a local survey. These include subdivision or partition surveys, boundary determinations or restorations, and building surveys, as well as the updating of the cadastre following land consolidation procedures (e.g., land rearrangement or building land reallocation procedures).
[...]
Updating surveys may only be conducted by authorized persons. These are mainly the respective cadastral or surveying offices and officially appointed surveyors (officially appointed surveyor). However, different regulations apply in the federal states."
"Hey, someone else will do it" is certainly more convenient
Regards, Bauexperte
The cadastral office is involved when surveying work reveals discrepancies compared to the existing cadastral records that need to be corrected (e.g., a boundary marker is leaning and is straightened) or when the survey establishes new conditions (e.g., a new boundary is created).
For engineering surveys, such as building staking or boundary notifications, the cadastral office is usually not involved.
Who commissioned the survey, for what purpose? What exactly was measured? What was recorded with the cadastral office? It’s best to ask your surveying engineer. They can clearly explain why they submitted their measurements to the cadastral office.
For engineering surveys, such as building staking or boundary notifications, the cadastral office is usually not involved.
Who commissioned the survey, for what purpose? What exactly was measured? What was recorded with the cadastral office? It’s best to ask your surveying engineer. They can clearly explain why they submitted their measurements to the cadastral office.
Hello ratlos00,
The likelihood that a publicly appointed surveyor submits data to the land registry office for adoption (!) just for fun is very low. Therefore, I assume that the colleague acted correctly and that the costs are unavoidable.
Two questions regarding this:
Was a certificate (boundary record) including an on-site meeting with all parties conducted during or after the survey, and/or were you sent a copy and/or notification of such a certificate/boundary record/boundary appointment?
What exactly does the fee notice from the land registry office state? Is a fee charged for the “adoption” or similar, or is there a fee for “survey documents” or something similar?
You can upload the invoice from the publicly appointed surveyor and/or the land registry office here, with all owner and address information redacted, including the federal state (!). This will probably clarify things quickly. It’s only about the wording in the notices, as mentioned above.
Alternatively, you can ask your publicly appointed surveyor and the land registry office directly. If you still believe the costs were unnecessary, you can have the relevant notices reviewed free of charge by the respective supervisory authority.
Best regards
Dirk Grafe
The likelihood that a publicly appointed surveyor submits data to the land registry office for adoption (!) just for fun is very low. Therefore, I assume that the colleague acted correctly and that the costs are unavoidable.
Two questions regarding this:
Was a certificate (boundary record) including an on-site meeting with all parties conducted during or after the survey, and/or were you sent a copy and/or notification of such a certificate/boundary record/boundary appointment?
What exactly does the fee notice from the land registry office state? Is a fee charged for the “adoption” or similar, or is there a fee for “survey documents” or something similar?
You can upload the invoice from the publicly appointed surveyor and/or the land registry office here, with all owner and address information redacted, including the federal state (!). This will probably clarify things quickly. It’s only about the wording in the notices, as mentioned above.
Alternatively, you can ask your publicly appointed surveyor and the land registry office directly. If you still believe the costs were unnecessary, you can have the relevant notices reviewed free of charge by the respective supervisory authority.
Best regards
Dirk Grafe