Hello, I have a question: which is healthier and why – an electric mat underfloor heating system (electromagnetic pollution) or a water-based underfloor heating system (flowing water—geopathic stress zones)?
D
Dämmunsinn-117 Apr 2009 23:16Argyle schrieb:
What can I say, maybe you shouldn’t just pass on Konrad Fischer’s wisdom but try it out yourself. Once you’ve spent several hundred thousand and are living in your non-insulated house, we can talk about energy consumption again. Basically, I am open to new ideas. But they should be realistic.As I said, only FOOLISH INSULATION!!
I removed the insulation from my house, installed radiant heating, and now need 30% less energy.
Goodbye
D
Dämmunsinn-118 Apr 2009 22:14Dämmunsinn schrieb:
OK
just a quick question.. Does a person need moist or dry air to breathe?????????????????? 😱 Be brave and try to answer my simple question????? 🙂
S
Serena1990-122 Jun 2015 10:24Dämmunsinn schrieb:
I removed the insulation from my house, installed radiant heating, and now need 30% less energy.Hi,
I have been following this discussion and have a few questions. A house without insulation—I can’t really imagine that. And the fact that it saves up to 30% energy is also hard for me to believe.
Maybe the experts can provide more information.
I should also take a closer look at this type of radiant heating.
N
Nicole1981-124 Jan 2016 09:48I think that’s wishful thinking. We have a water-based underfloor heating system, and we are satisfied with it. Especially now during the cold season, it’s very comfortable to have warmth coming from the floor.
Similar topics