ᐅ Which plot would you choose? Single-family home with a double garage
Created on: 13 Apr 2025 20:49
B
Buddy90
Hello everyone!
I’m planning to build a new house.
It will be a single-family home (about 150m² (1,615 sq ft)) with a double garage.
I have registered for two plots of land, and the allocation decision will be made on Tuesday.
Favorite 1: Number 83
Favorite 2: Number 80
Since I built a house only six years ago, I have unfortunately moved to the bottom of the social housing priority list. Most likely, plot 83 will be taken before I get the chance (the marketer is still waiting for documents from other interested parties).
However, there are apparently no other interested parties for plot number 80, so my chances there are quite good!
The downside of plot 83 would be a row of trees that (exactly as marked) run along the front of the house/driveway/garden… which would negatively affect the planned photovoltaic system.
On the other hand, it has good dimensions.
The downside of plot 80 is its unusual “shape.”
But would it still be possible to build a nice house with a double garage there?
It would probably be better for photovoltaic yield, and being in a cul-de-sac would mean more peace and quiet.
The plot is also somewhat cheaper overall compared to 83.
I don’t need a large garden.
What do you think?
I’m attaching a plan for you.
I’m planning to build a new house.
It will be a single-family home (about 150m² (1,615 sq ft)) with a double garage.
I have registered for two plots of land, and the allocation decision will be made on Tuesday.
Favorite 1: Number 83
Favorite 2: Number 80
Since I built a house only six years ago, I have unfortunately moved to the bottom of the social housing priority list. Most likely, plot 83 will be taken before I get the chance (the marketer is still waiting for documents from other interested parties).
However, there are apparently no other interested parties for plot number 80, so my chances there are quite good!
The downside of plot 83 would be a row of trees that (exactly as marked) run along the front of the house/driveway/garden… which would negatively affect the planned photovoltaic system.
On the other hand, it has good dimensions.
The downside of plot 80 is its unusual “shape.”
But would it still be possible to build a nice house with a double garage there?
It would probably be better for photovoltaic yield, and being in a cul-de-sac would mean more peace and quiet.
The plot is also somewhat cheaper overall compared to 83.
I don’t need a large garden.
What do you think?
I’m attaching a plan for you.
H
hanghaus202314 Apr 2025 21:12Are there no building setback lines specified in the zoning plan?
ypg schrieb:
With a double garage, it goes either way:@Buddy90 is the ridge direction strictly specified, as shown here?kbt09 schrieb:
@Buddy90 Is the ridge direction strictly specified, as shown here?No, there are no requirements regarding this.Buddy90 schrieb:
It will be a single-family house (about 150m2 (1,615 sq ft)) with a double garage. Up to that point, it was still manageable.
Buddy90 schrieb:
I would like the garage to be 7m (23 feet) wide and 8–9m (26–30 feet) long.
The house should ideally have two full floors and a pitched roof due to photovoltaic panels. Now it gets interesting.
Buddy90 schrieb:
I don’t need a large garden. May I ask? Why do you want to build again if you already have a fairly new house?
ypg schrieb:
May I ask? Why do you want to build again if you already have a relatively new house?Due to my wife leaving (and the related financial claims from her), the house will be sold. As a result, there will be some money left over.
I played around a bit with CAD software.
What do you think?