Hello,
I wanted to ask where it is best to place the Wi-Fi mesh system in a new build.
We have a basement, ground floor, first floor, and attic. The internet connection with the main router is in the basement.
Where is the best place to position the mesh repeaters? One per floor?
Which mesh system would you recommend for a stable Wi-Fi connection?
I wanted to ask where it is best to place the Wi-Fi mesh system in a new build.
We have a basement, ground floor, first floor, and attic. The internet connection with the main router is in the basement.
Where is the best place to position the mesh repeaters? One per floor?
Which mesh system would you recommend for a stable Wi-Fi connection?
rick2018 schrieb:
I also work a lot on my NAS, including with larger files. So data throughput on the LAN is important.I can understand that for LAN, why not. But how about mobile use within the house over Wi-Fi?17 access points. Almost everywhere 5 GHz coverage (including in the garden). You really need to manage the networks and transmit power here.
Because of the many APs, only a few devices connect to each access point at a time.
Due to my concrete construction, many APs are necessary.
My office LAN is 10 Gbps. Connection at the NAS and switches is 20 and 40 Gbps, respectively.
As I already mentioned, my network should not be used as a model or example.
Because of the many APs, only a few devices connect to each access point at a time.
Due to my concrete construction, many APs are necessary.
My office LAN is 10 Gbps. Connection at the NAS and switches is 20 and 40 Gbps, respectively.
As I already mentioned, my network should not be used as a model or example.
Yes, you are right, I am basically a standard user.
Regarding our house: the semi-detached house will be built using calcium silicate blocks with concrete ceilings.
I will, of course, try to connect as many devices as possible to the LAN.
For Wi-Fi, good coverage is important to me so there are no dead zones, but I don’t need extremely high transfer speeds (100 Mbps or more would be enough) since I don’t download very large amounts of data on mobile devices.
We will probably go with fiber optic from Vodafone with 500 Mbps.
Regarding our house: the semi-detached house will be built using calcium silicate blocks with concrete ceilings.
I will, of course, try to connect as many devices as possible to the LAN.
For Wi-Fi, good coverage is important to me so there are no dead zones, but I don’t need extremely high transfer speeds (100 Mbps or more would be enough) since I don’t download very large amounts of data on mobile devices.
We will probably go with fiber optic from Vodafone with 500 Mbps.
K
karl.jonas18 Feb 2022 08:41rick2018 schrieb:
Which access point supports gigabit speeds on the 2.4 GHz band? I haven't checked specific brands, but basically all with 802.11ax. Or at least many of them.
rick2018 schrieb:
And that’s not duplex. Of course not. Wi-Fi is never duplex.
rick2018 schrieb:
Only theoretical. That’s true as well. But even with only 25% actual data throughput, there is still plenty left.
rick2018 schrieb:
So connect all fixed devices via LAN. Install enough access points. Absolutely. Anyone familiar with wireless goes for wired connections. I just wanted to challenge the prejudice that “5 GHz is good, 2.4 GHz is bad.” The better access points usually support both anyway, and recently some even include 6 GHz.
Similar topics