ᐅ What will the building authority say?

Created on: 25 Jan 2020 01:03
R
RaBa2020
Hello and good morning,

A multi-family house is planned to be built. The plot of land has been purchased (601m² (6467 sq ft)). The existing building with outbuildings is being demolished.

Since I want to finalize the planning for this project now, I would appreciate any last suggestions regarding the room layouts of the residential units. In my opinion, the building potential of the plot is fully utilized. If not, what else could be done?

Ausschnitt eines Grundstücksplans mit Stempel und Text.

Technischer Grundriss mit Linien, Maßen, schraffierten Flächen und roten Rechteckmarken.

Grundrissplan einer Doppelhaushälfte mit zwei Wohnungen, Eingängen und Terrassen

Grundriss eines Mehrfamilienhauses mit 4 Wohnungen, Fluren, Bad, Küche und Aufzug.

Draufsicht Grundriss eines Penthouse-Wohnhauses; Küche, Wohnen, Bad, Schlafzimmer, Flur, Treppe

Querschnitt durch ein dreigeschossiges Wohnhaus mit Dachgauben, Fenstern, Türen und Balkonen
R
RaBa2020
25 Jan 2020 13:36
kbt09 schrieb:

How do you conclude that? When calculating, I referred to Section 19 of the Land Use Ordinance.
Section 19 of the Land Use Ordinance, but since the adoption decision for the development plan was made before 1990, I refer to the Land Use Ordinance of 1977 or 1968.
R
RaBa2020
25 Jan 2020 13:46
kaho674 schrieb:

Where is the heating?
In the attic/loft! In the utility room
Attic floor plan: utility room on the left, loft on the right (usable area 39.9 m² (429 sq ft)), marked in pink
11ant25 Jan 2020 13:50
It's almost a shame that I will be offline for the entire upcoming weekend, as I am really looking forward to Monday.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
K
kbt09
25 Jan 2020 13:53
I see it differently because §14 refers to "facilities" related to the points mentioned in §§2-13. Secondary facilities are then introduced in §14, and in my opinion, only those specified there are excluded in §19.

However, this is more a matter for @Escroda... or for your company lawyer.
Y
ypg
25 Jan 2020 14:16
RaBa2020 schrieb:

In the area, a similar building was constructed just one street over, and the apartments were sold as condominiums. Everything went smoothly.

The only issue was that it didn’t have an elevator.

One street over, the neighborhood can look very different. The zoning plan is no longer applicable here, but I recall there was only one row of buildings along the street that was not extended further west—except for your row of houses.

But honestly, I wouldn’t mind: I would be annoyed if four balcony units looked directly onto my terrace, and that is exactly what zoning plans are for—to protect personal privacy rights.
kaho674 schrieb:

I have my doubts whether the staircase in that form is allowed. I have never seen a stairwell with winding steps like that in a newly built multifamily house.

Actually, I have. It’s not uncommon in small apartment buildings.
Y
ypg
25 Jan 2020 14:29
I took a look at the plot on Google Maps and couldn’t help but smile: quite a lot of construction has taken place in the meantime.
There’s even a supermarket opposite now, and the open field I mentioned has obviously been built on in the meantime... Yes, how old plans can be misleading.