The new roof needs to be removed again. The Braas Divodämm Kompakt Plus has been settling for more than 7 months. This happens even with the perfectly sealed membrane foil – it’s an above-rafter insulation system. It is still unclear who will cover the damage costs. In any case, according to Braas, the attic cannot be converted. The tenant, who smokes, complains of headaches when spending extended time there.
What are your thoughts on the roof tiles? The new roofer says it’s not worth carefully removing the 1.10 euro engobed tiles intact from the roof, as it’s cheaper to install new ones with a crane. Also, the surface of the tiles may have been too much damaged. What do you think?
What are your thoughts on the roof tiles? The new roofer says it’s not worth carefully removing the 1.10 euro engobed tiles intact from the roof, as it’s cheaper to install new ones with a crane. Also, the surface of the tiles may have been too much damaged. What do you think?
Thank you, building expert,
the issue is no longer about who is at fault or liable. It is now solely about determining the extent of the damage; my post was focused only on that. So basically, it’s about what parts of the roof can still be reasonably salvaged from a cost-efficiency perspective.
the issue is no longer about who is at fault or liable. It is now solely about determining the extent of the damage; my post was focused only on that. So basically, it’s about what parts of the roof can still be reasonably salvaged from a cost-efficiency perspective.
B
Bauexperte16 Apr 2015 13:33To me, including my response among others
The decision about what happens to the current state rests with the second winner, not you.
Regards, Bauexperte
Bauexperte
The decision about what happens to the current state rests with the second winner, not you.
Regards, Bauexperte
Bauexperte