ᐅ Step townhouse on a 23x30 m lot with a floor area ratio of 0.25
Created on: 10 Sep 2020 11:45
D
DeadlyWords
Hello dear forum users,
My wife and I are about to purchase a plot of land. We have a structural engineer nearby who designs single-family houses and who is preparing the detailed planning for us as well as providing construction support. However, the zoning plan presents a challenge for us, as the designated site coverage ratio is only 0.25. Furthermore, our goal is to create a lot of living and working space on the ground floor, which is difficult with 684m² (7368 sq ft). The main issue for us is the space required for ancillary facilities. Maybe you have some ideas? We would be grateful for any input! I must admit that my wife and I are complete beginners.
Zoning Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 684m² (7368 sq ft)
Slope: approx. 1m (3 ft 3 in) drop over 23m (75 ft), and 0.5m (1 ft 8 in) over 30m (98 ft)
Site coverage ratio: 0.25
Floor area ratio: 0.5
Building setback lines: 5m (16 ft 5 in) from the street, otherwise unrestricted
Edge development: garages may be built up to the boundary line
Number of parking spaces: double garage + 5m (16 ft 5 in) driveway (3m (10 ft) area in front of garage is defined by zoning plan)
Number of floors: up to 2 full stories
Roof shape: no specifications
Architectural style: no specifications
Orientation: no specifications
Maximum heights/restrictions: none specified
Other requirements: only detached houses, one tree of a certain size per 300m² (3230 sq ft) of developed area, separate wastewater system
Neighbors: on the left, top, and right; street at the bottom with no restrictions such as planting islands or similar
Client Requirements
Architectural style, roof shape, building type: stepped floor with pitched roof or flat roof
Basement, number of floors: no basement due to soil class up to 7, 2 full stories
Number and age of occupants: 2 adults, 1 child
Ground floor space needs: living, dining, kitchen, guest room, office, WC/shower, utility room, access to garage
Upstairs: 2-3 rooms + 1 bathroom
Office use: family usage or home office? Both
Overnight guests per year: approx. 5-10
Open or closed layout: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island: island preferred
Number of dining seats: 6-8
Fireplace: no
Music/sound wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: possible as an extra, but only if budget allows
Garage, carport: double garage
Utility garden, greenhouse: no utility garden planned
Additional wishes/special features/daily routine, reasons for choices: welcome
House Design
Who designed it:
- Do-it-Yourself
- Living/usable area approx. 211m² (2271 sq ft)
What do you particularly like? Why? My wife and I would like two extra rooms on the ground floor to separate the office and guest room from the private sleeping area. Also, the southwest side with the living areas is pleasantly sunlit. The additional room upstairs is intended as a craft/music room (drums and piano) or as a backup room for child 2.
What do you dislike? Why? The only downside is the somewhat limited natural light in the office, but I think I can overlook that.
Estimated cost according to architect/planner: no estimate yet.
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings: €470,000
Preferred heating technology: heat pump (due to the small plot size, air-to-water)
If you have to give up on anything, which details/extensions
- can you do without: hard to say, as the ground floor layout is already quite compact. Possibly the technical room on the ground floor, but relocating it to the smaller upper floor also seems problematic.
- cannot do without: 2 additional rooms on the ground floor.
Why is the design as it is?
Since this is a completely new residential area, exemptions are out of the question. Due to a change in my professional field, there is a need for an office. Since the office is in a separate apartment, it could even qualify for additional KfW funding. As a base, we took a floor plan from Fischerhaus, rotated and mirrored it to optimize the position on the plot.
What do you think makes it particularly good or bad?
We like it because there is still a relatively large usable garden area, combined with good daylight. The only negative point is the access to the front door, but there’s always a trade-off in planning. On the plus side, the garden is quite well separated. Also, there is access to the house through the garage to avoid unnecessarily long trips when unloading.
What is the main/fundamental question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
We only have about 20m² (215 sq ft) left for the access path to the house and terrace. Do you see optimization potential here, or should we revise our wish list and possibly start over?
Best regards
Sarah and Christoph
My wife and I are about to purchase a plot of land. We have a structural engineer nearby who designs single-family houses and who is preparing the detailed planning for us as well as providing construction support. However, the zoning plan presents a challenge for us, as the designated site coverage ratio is only 0.25. Furthermore, our goal is to create a lot of living and working space on the ground floor, which is difficult with 684m² (7368 sq ft). The main issue for us is the space required for ancillary facilities. Maybe you have some ideas? We would be grateful for any input! I must admit that my wife and I are complete beginners.
Zoning Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 684m² (7368 sq ft)
Slope: approx. 1m (3 ft 3 in) drop over 23m (75 ft), and 0.5m (1 ft 8 in) over 30m (98 ft)
Site coverage ratio: 0.25
Floor area ratio: 0.5
Building setback lines: 5m (16 ft 5 in) from the street, otherwise unrestricted
Edge development: garages may be built up to the boundary line
Number of parking spaces: double garage + 5m (16 ft 5 in) driveway (3m (10 ft) area in front of garage is defined by zoning plan)
Number of floors: up to 2 full stories
Roof shape: no specifications
Architectural style: no specifications
Orientation: no specifications
Maximum heights/restrictions: none specified
Other requirements: only detached houses, one tree of a certain size per 300m² (3230 sq ft) of developed area, separate wastewater system
Neighbors: on the left, top, and right; street at the bottom with no restrictions such as planting islands or similar
Client Requirements
Architectural style, roof shape, building type: stepped floor with pitched roof or flat roof
Basement, number of floors: no basement due to soil class up to 7, 2 full stories
Number and age of occupants: 2 adults, 1 child
Ground floor space needs: living, dining, kitchen, guest room, office, WC/shower, utility room, access to garage
Upstairs: 2-3 rooms + 1 bathroom
Office use: family usage or home office? Both
Overnight guests per year: approx. 5-10
Open or closed layout: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island: island preferred
Number of dining seats: 6-8
Fireplace: no
Music/sound wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: possible as an extra, but only if budget allows
Garage, carport: double garage
Utility garden, greenhouse: no utility garden planned
Additional wishes/special features/daily routine, reasons for choices: welcome
House Design
Who designed it:
- Do-it-Yourself
- Living/usable area approx. 211m² (2271 sq ft)
What do you particularly like? Why? My wife and I would like two extra rooms on the ground floor to separate the office and guest room from the private sleeping area. Also, the southwest side with the living areas is pleasantly sunlit. The additional room upstairs is intended as a craft/music room (drums and piano) or as a backup room for child 2.
What do you dislike? Why? The only downside is the somewhat limited natural light in the office, but I think I can overlook that.
Estimated cost according to architect/planner: no estimate yet.
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings: €470,000
Preferred heating technology: heat pump (due to the small plot size, air-to-water)
If you have to give up on anything, which details/extensions
- can you do without: hard to say, as the ground floor layout is already quite compact. Possibly the technical room on the ground floor, but relocating it to the smaller upper floor also seems problematic.
- cannot do without: 2 additional rooms on the ground floor.
Why is the design as it is?
Since this is a completely new residential area, exemptions are out of the question. Due to a change in my professional field, there is a need for an office. Since the office is in a separate apartment, it could even qualify for additional KfW funding. As a base, we took a floor plan from Fischerhaus, rotated and mirrored it to optimize the position on the plot.
What do you think makes it particularly good or bad?
We like it because there is still a relatively large usable garden area, combined with good daylight. The only negative point is the access to the front door, but there’s always a trade-off in planning. On the plus side, the garden is quite well separated. Also, there is access to the house through the garage to avoid unnecessarily long trips when unloading.
What is the main/fundamental question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
We only have about 20m² (215 sq ft) left for the access path to the house and terrace. Do you see optimization potential here, or should we revise our wish list and possibly start over?
Best regards
Sarah and Christoph
Please draw the house on the plot.
There is no cloakroom.
The ground floor is not suitable for seniors with disabilities – until then, everything will remain as it is.
First floor
Move the doors so that there is space for a wardrobe behind them.
You are building a huge house and planning to do laundry in the bathroom, or am I misinterpreting the red squares?
There is no cloakroom.
The ground floor is not suitable for seniors with disabilities – until then, everything will remain as it is.
First floor
Move the doors so that there is space for a wardrobe behind them.
You are building a huge house and planning to do laundry in the bathroom, or am I misinterpreting the red squares?
D
DeadlyWords11 Sep 2020 09:57Before more input comes in, we have decided to paint a room downstairs and will upload a revised floor plan this evening. Thanks for all your contributions; although ant11 was quite direct, he was certainly right in some respects. The windows were placed only as a placeholder, which I probably should have mentioned.
@haydee The wardrobe was planned in front of the technical room, and the blue dashed lines indicate building boundaries while the white dashed lines mark the property boundaries.
The current plan looks as follows:
Ground floor: straighten the layout, remove complexity, eliminate the guest room and WC, replace them with a large office that includes an emergency sofa bed, and slightly enlarge the WC/shower. The idea behind this is that guests mostly visit on weekends anyway, and I would prefer to focus on my family/guests rather than working then.
First floor: adjust the floor plan accordingly, with two rooms – one master bedroom with a walk-in closet and one bathroom.
@haydee The wardrobe was planned in front of the technical room, and the blue dashed lines indicate building boundaries while the white dashed lines mark the property boundaries.
The current plan looks as follows:
Ground floor: straighten the layout, remove complexity, eliminate the guest room and WC, replace them with a large office that includes an emergency sofa bed, and slightly enlarge the WC/shower. The idea behind this is that guests mostly visit on weekends anyway, and I would prefer to focus on my family/guests rather than working then.
First floor: adjust the floor plan accordingly, with two rooms – one master bedroom with a walk-in closet and one bathroom.
D
DeadlyWords11 Sep 2020 10:34haydee schrieb:
new record. No one has been that fast before. GreatAre you making fun of me? Jokes aside, the thing is that the plot simply doesn't allow for it, we were aware of that (at least from our point of view), but maybe someone could come up with a clever idea. After three rather one-sided comments, we already thought that nothing would come of it.
I believe that was meant seriously. Most prospective homeowners who present their designs here usually defend them fiercely. So it’s quite refreshing when such an insight comes about almost “without conflict.”
Just to clarify: You’ve already canceled the accessory apartment, right?
Edit: According to the comment from @11ant, you should avoid planning a recessed top floor and instead build the upper floor on the same footprint as the ground floor. This is likely in line with the zoning plan (building permit / planning permission). Otherwise, you’ll end up limiting yourself with the low site coverage ratio and won’t even fully use the maximum floor area ratio, which—according to the project title—is desired here.
Just to clarify: You’ve already canceled the accessory apartment, right?
Edit: According to the comment from @11ant, you should avoid planning a recessed top floor and instead build the upper floor on the same footprint as the ground floor. This is likely in line with the zoning plan (building permit / planning permission). Otherwise, you’ll end up limiting yourself with the low site coverage ratio and won’t even fully use the maximum floor area ratio, which—according to the project title—is desired here.
Similar topics