ᐅ Single-family house, 200 m², constructed in an L-shape with a 45° angle
Created on: 25 Feb 2020 07:00
K
Kerstili
Hello
I would like to share our nearly finished floor plan and immediately ask for your opinions.
What would you change or do differently?
I appreciate any tips, suggestions, or advice...
Thank you very much in advance to everyone.
Development plan/restrictions
Plot size: 1580m² (0.39 acres)
Terrain: slight slope towards the street
Site coverage ratio
Floor area ratio
Building envelope, building line, and boundary:
Edge development
Number of parking spaces
Number of floors: two full stories
Roof type: gable roof
Architectural style
Orientation
Maximum heights/limits
Other requirements
Owners’ requirements
Style, roof type, building type: gable roof, angled building design
Basement, floors: two full stories with basement
Number of occupants, ages: 2 adults (early 30s) and 2 young children (1 and 4 years old)
Space requirements on the ground floor: living/dining area, kitchen, WC and shower, office (possibly a bedroom later), pantry
Upper floor: 2 children’s rooms, master bedroom, sewing room, bathroom
Office: family use or home office? Family use
Number of guest stays per year
Open or closed architecture: rather open
Conservative or modern building style: conventional
Open kitchen, kitchen island
Number of dining seats
Fireplace: yes
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: double garage
Utility garden, greenhouse:
Additional wishes/particulars/daily routine, including reasons why certain features should or should not be included
House design
Who created the plan:
- Do-it-yourself
What do you especially like? Why? Many windows for light
What do you not like? Why?
Price estimate according to architect/designer:
Personal price limit for the house, including fixtures and fittings:
Preferred heating system: air-source heat pump
If you have to give up some details or expansions:
- Which can you do without:
- Which can you not do without:
Why is the design like it is now? For example:
Angled building design for view and noise protection from the street
I would like to share our nearly finished floor plan and immediately ask for your opinions.
What would you change or do differently?
I appreciate any tips, suggestions, or advice...
Thank you very much in advance to everyone.
Development plan/restrictions
Plot size: 1580m² (0.39 acres)
Terrain: slight slope towards the street
Site coverage ratio
Floor area ratio
Building envelope, building line, and boundary:
Edge development
Number of parking spaces
Number of floors: two full stories
Roof type: gable roof
Architectural style
Orientation
Maximum heights/limits
Other requirements
Owners’ requirements
Style, roof type, building type: gable roof, angled building design
Basement, floors: two full stories with basement
Number of occupants, ages: 2 adults (early 30s) and 2 young children (1 and 4 years old)
Space requirements on the ground floor: living/dining area, kitchen, WC and shower, office (possibly a bedroom later), pantry
Upper floor: 2 children’s rooms, master bedroom, sewing room, bathroom
Office: family use or home office? Family use
Number of guest stays per year
Open or closed architecture: rather open
Conservative or modern building style: conventional
Open kitchen, kitchen island
Number of dining seats
Fireplace: yes
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: double garage
Utility garden, greenhouse:
Additional wishes/particulars/daily routine, including reasons why certain features should or should not be included
House design
Who created the plan:
- Do-it-yourself
What do you especially like? Why? Many windows for light
What do you not like? Why?
Price estimate according to architect/designer:
Personal price limit for the house, including fixtures and fittings:
Preferred heating system: air-source heat pump
If you have to give up some details or expansions:
- Which can you do without:
- Which can you not do without:
Why is the design like it is now? For example:
Angled building design for view and noise protection from the street
kaho674 schrieb:
Maybe you can find some ideas in Gusek’s Bogenhausen house:
[ATTACH alt="luxury-house-bogenhausen-floorplan-ground-floor.jpg"]43446[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH alt="luxury-house-bogenhausen-floorplan-attic.jpg"]43445[/ATTACH]
It would obviously need to be mirrored. Overall, I think the layout is quite successful.Thanks Looks very interesting
I’m just now joining the discussion. At least it’s very interesting.
The bend remains—that seems to be the consensus.
A lot has already been said, and I have looked at the site plan and floor plan numerous times. From all the points mentioned and what’s been on my mind, two key issues have stuck with me:
- I’m bothered by the orientation of the bend. The long side faces the street, and the short side faces the garden. This results in maximum exposure to the “less desirable” side and minimal exposure to the good side (the garden). The logical approach would be to give the nicer side more area and rotate the bend. If you imagine the shadow cast by a beam of light, you might also understand that this would better serve the desired noise protection.
- If the bend has to stay as it is, then in my opinion, the entrance should be located at the tip of the bend. Only that would be consistent. This would create a sort of left and right wing, which could work well with the room layout. I don’t like it as it currently is, and it’s not because of a problem corner, but rather the overall concept.
The bend remains—that seems to be the consensus.
A lot has already been said, and I have looked at the site plan and floor plan numerous times. From all the points mentioned and what’s been on my mind, two key issues have stuck with me:
- I’m bothered by the orientation of the bend. The long side faces the street, and the short side faces the garden. This results in maximum exposure to the “less desirable” side and minimal exposure to the good side (the garden). The logical approach would be to give the nicer side more area and rotate the bend. If you imagine the shadow cast by a beam of light, you might also understand that this would better serve the desired noise protection.
- If the bend has to stay as it is, then in my opinion, the entrance should be located at the tip of the bend. Only that would be consistent. This would create a sort of left and right wing, which could work well with the room layout. I don’t like it as it currently is, and it’s not because of a problem corner, but rather the overall concept.
kaho674 schrieb:
Maybe you can find some ideas from Gussek Haus Bogenhausen:That’s quite nice, but unfortunately it’s called Bogenhausen, not Bogenhausen.face26 schrieb:
As it is now, I don’t like it at all. And it’s not because of a problematic corner but because of the overall concept.Well, I find it crazy. But apparently this is becoming a new trend (?), building new houses that mimic renovations – here: https://www.hausbau-forum.de/threads/Neubau-efh-ca-190m-Doppelgarage-ohne-Keller-erstentwurf.33900/page-4#post-379447 we have another one styled like a renovation with a pseudo-retrofitted WC located near a daylight tunnel corridor. However, I would suspect this will remain a short-lived trend and/or appeal only to a very specific niche. It won’t find nearly as many fans as smokey eyes or rhombus cladding.face26 schrieb:
- If it has to stay as it is, in my opinion the entrance must be placed at the apex of the bend. Only that would be consistent. It would create kind of a left and right wing, which would make room layout easier to work with.Yes, with access from the bend – placing the entrance then on the inner angle – the “banana” shape could have some appeal.https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
[/QUOTE]
kbt09 schrieb:The driveway is planned on the right because it is purely an access road (serving two additional houses). The front few meters are paved, while the rear section is just gravel. There is also a street on the left; that is the main road. If the driveway were to be accessed via this main road, the sidewalk would have to be lowered, but I am not sure if that would be approved.
The property access is currently planned on the right side – is that correct? At least, that’s what I infer from the position of the front door and the view of the garage:
Is there also a street to the north/northwest from which access can be made?
Similar topics